Blog

Challenge, Actions, Result, Benefit Story

Job Analysis Assignment

 

Step 1: Using this template and the Job Analysis Information Form (included at the end of this document), interview someone you work with, or someone you may not work with but know well enough so that you are comfortable gathering the data required.

 

Step 2: Go the website for O*Net [http://www.onetonline.org/]. Utilizing the Find Occupations tab select Job Family, and based on the information you have gathered (not necessarily the job title the interviewee provided), find the occupation within the job family that you believe most accurately aligns with the data you have collected.Once you find the appropriate occupation, and view the summary, be sure to also go into the details tab for further information you will need for this assignment.

 

Step 3: Identify at least one item in your job analysis data collection that serves as the basis for your placement of this job within the O*Net job for each of the following categories:

 

Tasks:

 

 

Tools & Technology:

 

 

Knowledge:

 

 

 

Skills:

 

 

 

Abilities:

 

 

 

Work Activities:

 

 

 

Work Context:

 

 

 

Job Zone/Training:

 

 

Step 4:Provide a brief (150 word minimum) answer for each question. Draw from the concepts and terminology covered in the text.

 

1. What strategic value does the process of job analysis have for an organization?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1. Christensen (2006) introduces the concept of HR leadership as an “organizational architect”. How would this process of job analysis help support this role described by Christensen?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Step 5: Complete this document and submit for your job analysis week three assignment.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Job Analysis Information Form

 

 

Your Job Title:__________________________        O*Net Code/Title:_________________________________

 

Supervisor’s Title: ______________________

 

Hours Worked: ______________________ AM / PM to _________________________ AM / PM

 

1. What is the general purpose of your job?

 

 

 

 

1. What was your last job?

 

 

1. To what job would you normally expect to be promoted?

 

1. If you regularly supervise others, list the titles supervised:

 

 

 

 

1. If you supervise others, please check those activities that are part of your supervisory duties:

 

___ Hiring             ___ Orienting              ___ Directing              ___ Disciplining

 

___ Training          ___ Compensating      ___ Budgeting                        ___ Terminating

 

___ Scheduling     ___ Other

 

 

1. How would you describe the successful completion and results of your work?

 

 

 

 

1. Job Duties – Briefly describe what you do, and how you do it. Indicate those duties you consider to be most important and most difficult.

 

 

1. Daily duties:

 

 

 

1. Periodic duties (weekly, monthly, etc.):

 

 

1. How long have you been performing these duties?

 

 

1. Are you now performing what you would consider unnecessary duties for your position? If yes, please briefly describe:

 

 

 

1. Should you be performing duties not now included in your job? If yes, please briefly describe:

 

 

 

1. Education: Please check the blank that indicates the educational requirements for the job, not your educational background.

 

___ No formal education  ___ High School or equivalent           ___ 2-year or vocational certificate

 

___ 4-year college degree ___ Education beyond undergraduate – and/or professional license

 

List advance degrees or professional licensure or certificate requirement:

 

 

 

 

Please list the education you had at the time you were placed in this job:

 

 

 

1. Experience – Please check the amount of experience needed to perform you job.

 

___ None              ___ Less than one month                    ___ One month to six months

 

___ 6 months to1year       ___ 1- 5 years              ___ 3-5            ___ 5-10 years             ___ Over 10 years

 

1. Skills – List any specific skills required in the performance of your job (For example: high degree of accuracy, legal background, specific software, or other tools)

 

 

 

 

1. Please list the skills you had at the time you were placed in this job:

 

 

1. Equipment: Does your work require the use of any specific equipment?  ____ Yes  ___ No

 

If yes, please list the equipment and indicate the frequency of use.

 

Equipment                               Rarely              Occasionally                Frequently

 

_______________                  ____                ____                            ____

 

_______________                  ____                ____                            ____

 

_______________                  ____                ____                            ____

 

_______________                  ____                ____                            ____

 

 

1. Other comments relevant to the nature or complexity of the work or environment:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HR Analyst: __________________________                       Date Completed: _________________

 

 

 

law paper

Do you belief that a judge can ever be purely impartial in a case? Do you remember Judge Ito from the OJ case? Think about the judge in the Anthony murder trial in Florida

Strategy and Sustainability

Identify an environmental trend affecting higher education. Explain why it is important and what effect it may have on higher education in the next ten years.

Organizational Culture

The purpose of this activity is to investigate a company’s organizational culture.  Your paper should be designed to provide specific information about a company’s culture. After selecting a company you should conduct a little research about the company and then make an analysis of it and its potential success. You could select a company you work for, or an organization where you volunteer, or an organization where you would LOVE to work. Your paper should be 1-2 pages in length, double spaced. Apa format

Creating and Leading Effective Teams

Creating and Leading Effective Teams

Details:

Review the Harvard Business School reprint, Leading Teams. Consider the criteria for successful teams and the factors needed to ensure teams are structured for success.

Create a plan (750-1,000 words) describing the steps necessary to create more successful teams at various levels within your organization. Include the following in the plan:

Define the characteristics and structure of successful teams within your organization. How are independent teams vital to the success of your organization?

1. What are important factors to consider when leading teams within the various levels of the organization?
2. What factors are important to consider when leading teams at the executive level?
3. What aspects are essential in identifying appropriate members for teams and ensuring the teams are successfully launched?
4. What factors are important to ongoing team dynamics? Describe guidelines to evaluate the function and productivity of teams.
5. Compassion is a significant attribute of many religions and philosophies, including a Christian worldview, as well as being important for both authentic and servant leadership. As a leader, how would you empower your teams through compassion to honor diversity and support equality for all members as they work toward a common goal?

Rubic

Top of Form Creating and Leading Effective Teams   1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less than Satisfactory 74.00% 3 Satisfactory 79.00% 4 Good 87.00% 5 Excellent 100.00% 70.0 %Content   10.0 %Definition of Characteristics and Structure of Successful Teams Within Your Organization Plan provides an incomplete or insufficient definition of characteristics and structure of successful teams within your organization. Evidence to justify conclusions is vague or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent. Plan provides an incomplete or insufficient definition of characteristics and structure of successful teams within your organization. Evidence to justify conclusions is vague or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent. Plan provides an elemental definition of characteristics and structure of successful teams within your organization. Some subject knowledge is evident. Plan provides a definition of characteristics and structure of successful teams within your organization. Detailed examples and evidence are included. Subject knowledge is competent. Plan provides a thorough and fully developed definition of characteristics and structure of successful teams within your organization. Plan includes relevant examples and applicable insight. Plan demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge and understanding. 10.0 %Explanation of How Independent Teams Are Vital to the Success of Your Organization Plan does not include an explanation of how independent teams are vital to the success of your organization. Plan provides an incomplete or insufficient explanation of how independent teams are vital to the success of your organization. Plan provides an elemental definition of explanation of how independent teams are vital to the success of your organization. Some subject knowledge is evident. Plan provides an explanation of how independent teams are vital to the success of your organization. Detailed examples and evidence are included. Subject knowledge is competent. Plan provides a thorough and fully developed explanation of how independent teams are vital to the success of your organization. Plan includes relevant examples and applicable insight. Plan demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge and 10.0 %Description of Important Factors to Consider When Leading Teams Within The Various Levels of the Organization Including the Executive Level Plan does not include a description of important factors to consider when leading teams within the various levels of the organization including the executive level. Plan provides an incomplete or insufficient description of important factors to consider when leading teams within the various levels of the organization, including the executive level. Evidence to justify conclusions is vague or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent. Plan provides an elemental description of important factors to consider when leading teams within the various levels of the organization, including the executive level. Some subject knowledge is evident. Plan provides a description of important factors to consider when leading teams within the various levels of the organization, including the executive level. Detailed examples and evidence are included. Subject knowledge is competent. Plan provides a thorough and fully developed description of important factors to consider when leading teams within the various levels of the organization, including the executive level. Plan includes relevant examples and applicable insight. Plan demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge and understanding. 10.0 %Description of Aspects Essential in Identifying the Appropriate Members for a Team and Ensuring the Team Is Successfully Launched Plan does not include a description of aspects essential in identifying the appropriate members for a team. Plan provides an incomplete or insufficient description of aspects essential in identifying the appropriate members for a team. Evidence to justify conclusions is vague or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent. Plan provides an elemental description of aspects essential in identifying the appropriate members for a team. Some subject knowledge is evident. Plan provides a description of aspects essential in identifying the appropriate members for a team. Detailed examples and evidence are included. Subject knowledge is competent. Plan provides a thorough and fully developed description of aspects essential in identifying the appropriate members for a team. Plan includes relevant examples and applicable insight. Plan demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge and understanding. 10.0 %Factors Important to Ongoing Team Dynamics Plan does not include an explanation of factors important to ongoing team dynamics. Plan provides an incomplete or insufficient explanation factors important to ongoing team dynamics. Evidence to justify conclusions is vague or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent. Plan provides an elemental explanation of factors important to ongoing team dynamics. Some subject knowledge is evident. Plan provides an explanation of factors important to ongoing team dynamics. Detailed examples and evidence are included. Subject knowledge is competent. Plan provides a thorough and fully developed explanation of factors important to ongoing team dynamics. Plan includes relevant examples and applicable insight. Plan demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge and understanding. 10.0 %Description of Evaluation Guidelines for Team Function and Productivity Plan does not include a description of evaluation guidelines for team function and productivity Plan provides an incomplete or insufficient description of evaluation guidelines for team function and productivity. Evidence to justify conclusions is vague or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent. Plan provides an elemental description of evaluation guidelines for team function and productivity. Some subject knowledge is evident. Plan provides a description of evaluation guidelines for team function and productivity. Detailed examples and evidence are included. Subject knowledge is competent. Plan provides a thorough and fully developed description of evaluation guidelines for team function and productivity. Plan includes relevant examples and applicable insight. Plan demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge and understanding. 10.0 %Explanation of How You Would Empower Your Teams Through Compassion to Honor Diversity and Support Equality for All Members as They Work Toward a Common Goal Plan does not include an explanation of how you would empower your teams through compassion to honor diversity and support equality for all members as they work toward a common goal. Plan provides an incomplete or insufficient explanation of how you would empower your teams through compassion to honor diversity and support equality for all members as they work toward a common goal. Evidence to justify conclusions is vague or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent. Plan provides an elemental explanation of how you would empower your teams through compassion to honor diversity and support equality for all members as they work toward a common goal. Some subject knowledge is evident. Plan provides an explanation of how you would empower your teams through compassion to honor diversity and support equality for all members as they work toward a common goal. Detailed examples and evidence are included. Subject knowledge is competent. Plan provides a thorough and fully developed explanation of how you would empower your teams through compassion to honor diversity and support equality for all members as they work toward a common goal. Plan provides relevant examples and applicable insight. Plan demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge and understanding. 20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness   7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecast the development of the paper. Thesis statement is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. 20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness   8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. 20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness   5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. 10.0 %Format   5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct. 5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. 100 %Total Weightage   Bottom of Form

 

Technology Management

Identify, locate and research published information about one (1) current “emerging technology”.

 

• Develop and write an original paper that describes the technology, and explains the potential impact that the technology will have on the global society by the year 2025.

 

• The paper is to be 800 to 900 words including reference pages.  NO ABSTRACT!

 

• Use proper APA headings as needed to assist your reader.

 

• Each paper is to have, at least, three (3) cited references other than the textbook.

 

• Assignment Submission Instructions: Paper is to be submitted as an attachment to an e-mail.  The file name must follow this format: 01W-Your Last Name-Assignment 1.

 

• Your paperis to be written in Times New Roman, 12 point font.

 

• Margins: One (1”) inch margins left, right and bottom and a two (2”) inch margin at top of page (an exception to APA).

 

• Line Spacing: Single-spaced between all text lines of the paper (an exception to APA).

 

• On all pages of the paper, place your full name (last name first), CWID, course number and section and the date submitted in the upper left-hand corner of the page. Use 10 point font.

 

 

 

Example:         Smith, John-12345678

 

TMGT 51601W-9/26/2017

 

 

 

• Pagination: On all pages of the paper,place page numbers in the upper right-hand corner of the page.  Use 10 point font.

 

 

 

Example:         1 of 10 or Page 1 of 10

 

 

 

• Summary Title:On the first line of page 1, centered and bold in 12 point font, place the research paper title.  The title is to be (example):  ASSIGNMENT #1 RESEARCH PAPER ON …

 

• You are not to include a title page, abstract, or table of contents.  Your paper must include a reference section for your citations.

 

• Bulleted lists are acceptable as they make it easier for the reader to process information.  Follow APA guidelines for developing bulleted lists.

Future of Organizational Behavior

The health care industry, like other industries, is a very competitive environment. As organizational behavior within health care companies evolves, it will be even more important to consider its future and the need of continuing education.  The company that I choose is health care manufacturing company.

 

Create a 10- to 12-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation that addresses the following:

• Explain the importance of continuing education.
• Using the company selected in Week One, describe the support it provides for continuing education.
• Describe the future of organizational behavior.
• Based on the trends of the health care industry, describe what you think the future holds for the company selected in Week One.

Cite 2 peer-reviewed, scholarly, or similar references to support your presentation.

Format your presentation according to APA guidelines. Include a title page, detailed speaker notes, and a references page.

Assignment: Competitive Advantage Case Study (PLG1)

Businesses are always striving to “win,” as the course textbook points out in Chapter 1. One highly competitive marketplace is that of the commercial airline industry.

Written Assignment: Choose a Part 121 air carrier (such as American, Delta, Southwest, etc.) and provide data that shows how that enterprise has successfully employed competitive advantage obtained through the utilization of information technology to win and keep loyal customers or operate more efficiently in the reservations, maintenance, or operations departments. You may provide a historical example that would be found going back several decades. Learning from the past is a great way to succeed in the future.

 

Conduct in-depth research on the topic using, at least, two primary sources, outside of the course textbook, as references. Compose your Case Study assignment deliverable as a scholarly paper. Use Microsoft Word® to compose your data. Please remember to include a Title Page with a “Running head,” an Abstract, in-text citations, a Conclusion, and a Reference List. The body of the paper should be two-three pages of double-spaced text in length.

Use APA Style to cite and reference any data “borrowed” from sources. Your composition needs to be grammatically sound and free of spelling errors. Use terminology from the reference sources and your textbook. Unless you are a subject matter expert on the topic, based on your degrees, certifications or “on the job training,” do not submit data obtained only from personal experience. Your document submission is due by the end of Module 1. Your submission data will be checked through Turnitin, a service that checks your work for potential plagiarism.

 

Impact of Change

Imagine your team has been informed that there has been a change in a regulation or process or that a program has been created. Your team is responsible for determining the impact of this change and its effect on the company. This assignment refers to the topic selected in Week Three.

Team A has chosen the Transition to Electronic Health Records.

Write a 625- to 750-word paper that addresses the following:

• Describe why the change was implemented.
• Explain what impact internal and external influences have on culture and organizational behavior.

Cite 3 peer-reviewed, scholarly, or similar references to support your paper.

Format your paper according to APA guidelines.

environmental pollution

Topic: Identification of the rang environmental pollution of management measures to reduce motor vehicle pollution in urban areas of developing countries.(INDIA)