Maladaptive Responses to Immune Disorders

Maladaptive Responses to Immune Disorders

 

Maladaptive Responses to Immune Disorders

 

Discussion: Maladaptive Responses to Immune Disorders
Maladaptive responses to disorders are compensatory mechanisms that ultimately have adverse health effects for patients. For instance, a patient’s allergic reaction to
peanuts might lead to anaphylactic shock, or a patient struggling with depression might develop a substance-abuse problem. To properly diagnose and treat patients,
advanced practice nurses must understand both the pathophysiology of disorders and potential maladaptive responses that some disorders cause.
Consider immune disorders, such as HIV, psoriasis, inflammatory bowel disease, and systemic lupus E. What are resulting maladaptive responses for patients with these
disorders?
To prepare:
Review Chapter 6 and Chapter 8 in the Huether and McCance text, as well as the Yi, et al, article in the Learning Resources. Reflect on the concept of maladaptive
responses to disorders.
Select two of the following immune disorders: HIV, psoriasis, inflammatory bowel disease, and/or systemic lupus E (SLE).
Think about the pathophysiology of each disorder you selected. Consider the compensatory mechanisms that the disorders trigger. Then, compare the resulting maladaptive
and physiological responses of the two disorders.
Consider the types of drugs that would be prescribed to patients to treat symptoms associated with these disorders and why.
Select one of the following patient factors: genetics, gender, ethnicity, age, or behavior. Consider how your selected factor might impact the disorder. Then, reflect
on how your selected factor might impact the effects of prescribed drugs, as well as any measures you might take to help reduce any negative side effects.
By Day 3
Post a brief description of the pathophysiology of the immune disorders you selected. Explain how the maladaptive and physiological responses of the two disorders
differ. Then, describe the types of drugs that would be prescribed to patients to treat symptoms associated with these immune disorders and why. Explain how the factor
you selected might impact the pathophysiology of each disorder as well as the effects of prescribed drugs. Finally, explain any measures you might take to help reduce
any negative side effects.
Note: Post a (at least 500 word) response. Be sure to use evidence from the readings and include in-text citations. Utilize essay-level writing practice and skills,
including the use of transitional material and organizational frames. Use the writing resources and the Discussion and Response Rubric to develop your post. Three
credible references are required for this discussion post. A reference list is required. Use the most current evidence (usually less than or equal to 5 years old).

 

Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn 9/13/17, 22:59
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16301266_1&rubric_id=_173550_1 Page 1 of 7
Show Descriptions
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Name: NURS_6301_Week3_Discussion_Rubric
Exit
Grid View List View
Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s)
is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course
readings for the module and current credible sources.
supported by at least 3 current, credible sources
Responds to the discussion question(s)
is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course
readings for the module.
75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth
supported by at least 3 credible references
Responds to most of the discussion question(s)
is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from
the course readings for the module.
50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth
supported by at least 3 credible references
Main Posting:
Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis
representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current
credible sources.
—
Outstanding Performance 44 (44%) – 44 (44%)
Excellent Performance 40 (40%) – 43 (43%)
Competent Performance 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Proficient Performance 31 (31%) – 34 (34%)
Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn 9/13/17, 22:59
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16301266_1&rubric_id=_173550_1 Page 2 of 7
Responds to some of the discussion question(s)
one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed
is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis
somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references
Does not respond to the discussion question(s)
lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria
lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis
does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
contains only 1 or no credible references
Room for Improvement 0 (0%) – 30 (30%)
Written clearly and concisely
Contains no grammatical or spelling errors
Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Written clearly and concisely
May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error
Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Written concisely
May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error
Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Written somewhat concisely
May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors
Contains some APA formatting errors
Main Posting:
Writing —
Outstanding Performance 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Excellent Performance 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
Competent Performance 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Proficient Performance 4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)
Room for Improvement 0 (0%) – 4 (4%)
Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn 9/13/17, 22:59
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16301266_1&rubric_id=_173550_1 Page 3 of 7
Not written clearly or concisely
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style
Meets requirements for timely and full participation
posts main discussion by due date
NA
NA
NA
Does not meet requirement for full participation
Main Posting:
Timely and full participation —
Outstanding Performance 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Excellent Performance 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Competent Performance 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Proficient Performance 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Room for Improvement 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings
responds to questions posed by faculty
the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of
learning objectives
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting
Response is on topic, may have some depth
Response may not be on topic, lacks depth
First Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.
—
Outstanding Performance 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
Excellent Performance 8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)
Competent Performance 7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)
Proficient Performance 6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)
Room for Improvement 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
First Response:
Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn 9/13/17, 22:59
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16301266_1&rubric_id=_173550_1 Page 4 of 7
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues
Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources
Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues
Response to faculty questions are answered if posed
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources
Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues
Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed
Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources
Response is written in Standard Edited English
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication
Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed
Few or no credible sources are cited
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective
Response to faculty questions are missing
No credible sources are cited
Writing —
Outstanding Performance 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Excellent Performance 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
Competent Performance 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Proficient Performance 4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)
Room for Improvement 0 (0%) – 4 (4%)
Meets requirements for timely and full participation
posts by due date
NA
First Response:
Timely and full participation —
Outstanding Performance 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Excellent Performance 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn 9/13/17, 22:59
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16301266_1&rubric_id=_173550_1 Page 5 of 7
NA
NA
Does not meet requirement for full participation
Competent Performance 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Proficient Performance 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Room for Improvement 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions
posed by faculty
the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of
learning objectives
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting
Response is on topic, may have some depth
Response may not be on topic, lacks depth
Second Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. —
Outstanding Performance 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
Excellent Performance 8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)
Competent Performance 7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)
Proficient Performance 6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)
Room for Improvement 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues
Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources
Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues
Response to faculty questions are answered if posed
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources
Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English
Second Response:
Writing —
Outstanding Performance 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Excellent Performance 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn 9/13/17, 22:59
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16301266_1&rubric_id=_173550_1 Page 6 of 7
Total Points: 100
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues
Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed
Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources
Response is written in Standard Edited English
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication
Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed
Few or no credible sources are cited
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective
Response to faculty questions are missing
No credible sources are cited
Competent Performance 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Proficient Performance 4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)
Room for Improvement 0 (0%) – 4 (4%)
Meets requirements for timely and full participation
Posts by due date
NA
NA
NA
Does not meet requirement for full participation
Second Response:
Timely and full participation —
Outstanding Performance 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Excellent Performance 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Competent Performance 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Proficient Performance 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Room for Improvement 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Name: NURS_6301_Week3_Discussion_Rubric
Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn 9/13/17, 22:59
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16301266_1&rubric_id=_173550_1 Page 7 of 7
Exit