Hypothesize what type of environments make being autotrophic, heterotr
Hypothesize what type of environments make being autotrophic, heterotrophic or mixotrophic an advantage to a protist.Many algae are photosynthetic like plants. Why then are they not classified as such?Some protists are colony forming. Hypothesize why this may be an advantage or disadvantage.
Using the library, unit resources, and the Internet, select a curricul
Using the library, unit resources, and the Internet, select a curriculum approach for further research. Try to select an approach that matches your area of expertise or interest.For your selected curriculum approach, answer the following questions in an APA-formatted paper:How is this approach similar or different from your personal approach to the design, development, implementation, and evaluation of curriculum?How effective would this approach be as a guide to curriculum within your current or anticipated curriculum area (K12, higher education, corporate training, or military)?What is the value of this theory for educators or trainers who are designing, implementing, or evaluating curriculum today?Your research must include sources outside of the textbook. Be sure to use APA manuscript format for your submission.
Tracker JackersIn the book by Suzanne Collins and the movie, “The
Tracker JackersIn the book by Suzanne Collins and the movie, "The Hunger Games", tracker jackersare wasps genetically engineered to1. Track their victims2. Inject a venom that attacks the fear center of the brain and acts as a hallucinogen How would you genetically engineer a tracker jacker?1. What would be the function of your genes of interest?2. From what organism or organisms would you obtain extract genes?3. Using the information you learned about genetic engineering and proteinsynthesis, describe how would you get genes from another organism into thewasps DNA?4. Research recommend laboratory testing the proteins of your geneticallyengineered tracker jacker to determine if the new genes have been incorporated.Why can testing the proteins provide information about the genetic make up ofyour organism?Do your design as a word.
Q46 page 134 and 135 from introduction to probability by Joseph k.Bli
Q46 page 134 and 135 from introduction to probability by Joseph k.Blitzstein .Independent Bernoulli trials are performed, with success probability 1/2 for each trial. An important question that often comes up in such settings is how many trials toperform. Many controversies have arisen in statistics over the issue of how to analyze data coming from an experiment where the number of trials can depend on the data collected so far.For example, if we can follow the rule keep performing trials until there are more than twice as many failures as successes, and then stop , then naively looking at the ratio of failures to successes (if and when the process stops) will give more than 2:1 rather than the true theoretical 1:1 ratio; this could be a very misleading result! However, it might never happen that there are more than twice as many failures as successes; in this problem, you will find the probability of that happening.(a) Two gamblers, A and B, make a series of bets, where each has probability 1/2 of winning a bet, but A gets $2 for each win and loses $1 for each loss (a very favorable game for A!). Assume that the gamblers are allowed to borrow money, so they can and do gamble forever. Let pk be the probability that A, starting with $k, will ever reach $0, for each k ? 0. Explain how this story relates to the original problem, and how the original problem can be solved if we can find pk.(b) Find pk.Hint: As in the gambler’s ruin, set up and solve a difference equation for pk. We have pk ? 0 as k ? ? (you don’t need to prove this, but it should make sense since thegame is so favorable to A, which will result in A’s fortune going to ? ; a formal proof, not required here, could be done using the law of large numbers, an important theorem from Chapter 10). The solution can be written neatly in terms of the golden ratio.(c) Find the probability of ever having more than twice as many failures as successeswith independent Bern(1/2) trials, as originally desired.
The experiment data in below table was to evaluate the effects of thre
The experiment data in below table was to evaluate the effects of three variables on invoice errors for a company. Invoice errors had been a major contributor to lengthening the time that customers took to pay their invoices and increasing the accounts receivables for a major chemical company. It was conjectured that the errors might be due to the size of the customer (larger customers have more complex orders), the customer location (foreign orders are more complicated), and the type of product. A subset of the data is summarized in the following Table.Table: Invoice Experiment ErrorCustomer SizeCustomer LocationProduct TypeNumber of Errors—15+–18-+-6++-2–+19+-+23-++16+++21Customer Size: Small (-), Large (+)Customer Location: Foreign (-), Domestic (+)Product Type: Commodity (-), Specialty (=)Reference: Moen, Nolan, and Provost (R. D. Moen, T. W. Nolan and L. P. Provost. Improving Quality through Planned Experimentation. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991)Use the date in table above and answer the following questions in the space provided below:What is the nature of the effects of the factors studied in this experiment?What strategy would you use to reduce invoice errors, given the results of this experiment?Type your answers below and submit
)dq 1The Revision Process (graded)By now, you may have heard that writ
)dq 1The Revision Process (graded)By now, you may have heard that writing is a form of discovery. When we write, we may discover how we really feel about our topic, what we really know about our topic, and what we need to know about our topic. In this discussion, please share a few discoveries you uncovered while publishing the commentary essay. Did you discover information about the commentary genre itself? Did you make discoveries about your topic?(Peer Review Team A)The Revision Process (graded)By now, you may have heard that writing is a form of discovery. When we write, we may discover how we really feel about our topic, what we really know about our topic, and what we need to know about our topic. In this discussion, please share a few discoveries you uncovered while publishing the commentary essay. Did you discover information about the commentary genre itself? Did you make discoveries about your topic? (Peer Review Team B)Peer Review Team B (graded)This week, well be sharing our writing publicly in a class peer review. In order to make this process run smoothly, please be sure to follow the instructions noted below.Find your name on the peer review assignment list provided by your professor to determine whether you are in Group A, B, or C.Once you have located your assigned group, join that discussion area and hit reply to the initial prompt. In your reply, leave feedback for your classmates with general information about your publish. Explain the current state of your publish, your plans to add content, and your revision plans. If you have specific questions for the peers who will review your publish, or want to provide them with any additional information, please do so in your initial post.Attach your current publish to your initial post. This must be completed no later than Tuesday night (midnight MT).Find the two peers who have posted after you in terms of time. Read their attached essays and any notes they left to accompany the publish. Find the Week 7 Peer Review Worksheet in Doc Sharing and download it. Complete the form separately for each of the two peers whose publishs you will be reviewing.Return your completed Peer Review Worksheet as an attachment in a response post to each of your peers separately. This must be completed no later than Friday night (midnight MT).Continue to check into your group Discussion area in the event your peers pose any follow-up questions.**Please note: If you are the last to post in your group before the Tuesday midnight deadline, you should review the students who post in the #1 and #2 slot. If you are second last to post in your group, please review the students who post in the last and #1 slot.Be sure to ask your professor if you have any questions about the peer review process. (Peer Review Team C)Peer Review Team C (graded)This week, well be sharing our writing publicly in a class peer review. In order to make this process run smoothly, please be sure to follow the instructions noted below.Find your name on the peer review assignment list provided by your professor to determine whether you are in Group A, B, or C.Once you have located your assigned group, join that discussion area and hit reply to the initial prompt. In your reply, leave feedback for your classmates with general information about your publish. Explain the current state of your publish, your plans to add content, and your revision plans. If you have specific questions for the peers who will review your publish, or want to provide them with any additional information, please do so in your initial post.Attach your current publish to your initial post. This must be completed no later than Tuesday night (midnight MT).Find the two peers who have posted after you in terms of time. Read their attached essays and any notes they left to accompany the publish. Find the Week 7 Peer Review Worksheet in Doc Sharing and download it. Complete the form separately for each of the two peers whose publishs you will be reviewing.Return your completed Peer Review Worksheet as an attachment in a response post to each of your peers separately. This must be completed no later than Friday night (midnight MT).Continue to check into your group Discussion area in the event your peers pose any follow-up questions.**Please note: If you are the last to post in your group before the Tuesday midnight deadline, you should review the students who post in the #1 and #2 slot. If you are second last to post in your group, please review the students who post in the last and #1 slot.Be sure to ask your professor if you have any questions about the peer review process.
Consider a quiz game show where you are given two questions to answer.
Consider a quiz game show where you are given two questions to answer. Q1 will be answered correctlywith probability 0.8 and Q2 with probability 0.5. Answering Q1 correctly carries a reward of $ 1000 whileanswering Q2 correctly carries a reward of $ 2000. You get to choose the order in which you answer thequestions. The catch is that if you answer your first question incorrectly then the quiz terminates; you donot get a chance to attempt the second question. For a given order of answering the questions, let X bethe random variable that is the number of correctly answered questions and let g(x) be the total rewardreceived.(a) Suppose you answer Q1 first and then Q2. Find the expected reward, that is, E(g(X)).(b) Suppose you answer Q2 first and then Q1. Find E(g(X)).(c) In what order should you answer the questions to maximize your prize money?
The #54 bus arrives at the stop near your house every quarter-hour sta
The #54 bus arrives at the stop near your house every quarter-hour starting at 6:00 a.m. You arrive at thebus stop every morning between 7:10 and 7:30, with the arrival time being uniformly distributed in thisinterval. Let X be the random variable that denotes your waiting time for the bus.(a) What is the PDF of X?(b) What is the probability that you have to wait more than 10 minutes?
Part 1What are some of the educational claims of popular tablets, lapt
Part 1What are some of the educational claims of popular tablets, laptops, and mobile devices? Do you believe that these claims are valid? Can such devices increase accuracy and speed of research projects? What advantages and disadvantages do you see in online research? How might you plan a research project to find the best and most reliable academic resources for a project? How do your approaches differ from those of your classmates?Part 2Locate an advertisement or commercial that implies research study results. Describe the claims made, and discuss how differences in sampling of the population might create biased results. Discuss what could account for the bias results.
Determining ProbabilitiesAverage production is 5,000 modules per week
Determining ProbabilitiesAverage production is 5,000 modules per week with a standard dev of 2001. What is the probability that next weeks production is between 4,800 and 5400?2. What is the probability that next weeks production is less than 4,400?3.What is the probability that next weeks production is between 5,200 and 5,400?Please show all formulas and how the numbers were plugged in as well as p values found on tables Thank you