Sketch flowchart to print average for student
Sketch flowchart to print average for student
Software Engineering
Draw a flowchart to print the average for each student in a class.
Output. Output is report showing each student’s name and average.
Input. Input consists of student records each containing a student’s name(STUDENT-NAME), score for first test(TEST), score for second test(TEST2), and score for third test(TEST3).
Calculation. AVERAGE = (TEST1+TEST2+TEST3)/3
What laboratory tests would confirm the diagnosis
What laboratory tests would confirm the diagnosis
Science
A 25-year-old man was admitted to the hospital in mid-June for malaise and shortness of breath of 1 day’s duration. Three days before admission, he had developed sneezing and a runny and stuffy nose. Two days before admission, he developed a nonproductive cough, a headache behind his eyes, a fever, and red blotches on his face. One day before admission, the rash covered most of his face and had spread to his arms and trunk.
Upon questioning, he stated that he had no known tick exposure, that his mother had told him that he had measles as an infant, and that he had never received measles vaccine.
A. Why do you think the patient was asked about tick exposure’?
Physical examination of the patient revealed a temperature of l00°F, a relatively low total white blood cell count, labored breathing, a red face, and an erythcmatous maculopapular rash on his trunk, palms, and extremities. Examination of his mouth revealed several salt-grain~size, raised white spots on his buccal mucosa (the lining of his cheeks).
B. What disease is suggested by the combination of fever, rash, and white spots on the patient’s buccal mucosa?
C. What pathogen causes this disease?
D. What are the white spots called?
E. What laboratory tests would confirm the diagnosis?
Create the system architecture models
Create the system architecture models
Software Engineering
Question :1. Use CASE tool Model to create an application class model that includes entity classes, user interface classes, boundary, and controller classes
2. Use CASE tool Model to create the System Architecture models. Use the 4+1 approach with the UML diagrams.
IT Online Training needs to develop an online service for IT training that includes scheduled as well as self-paced courses. The training service will be initially web-based but the architecture must have the option that different front-ends like applets, web services, or other designs can be used. The main function of the training site is to provide IT courses to its customers over the Internet.
Sponsor Requirements
The sponsors of the project have identified some preliminary requirements of the system as documented below.
The following are some initial requirements of the application.
1. Purchase courses.
Q1 Users must be able to purchase courses via an online shopping cart.
Q2 The user must be able to add courses to an online shopping cart.
Q3 Users must be able to remove courses from an online shopping cart.
Q4 Users must be able to cancel orders.
Q5 Users must be able to purchase by credit card.
Q6 System must provide certificates of completion for users.
2. Maintain Customer accounts
Q1 Users must be able to create a customer account
Q2 The system must be able to store customer information like name, address, and credit card details at login.
Q3 The system must maintain a list of accounts in its central database.
Q4 The system must match the user name and password against the information stored in the master account list when the user logs in.
3. Maintain Course information.
Q1 The system must be able to create, modify, and delete course information including course number, course title, course duration, course prerequisites, course description, CEU credits, related courses, and cost.
Q2 The system must maintain course history including offering dates (beginning and ending), number of students enrolled, and instructor.
Q3 The system must provide search capability for courses based on category, popular course, recent releases, planned courses.
Q4 The system must provide video viewing capability for courses.
Q5 The system must provide search capability for all courses offered.
4. Maintain Instruction information.
Q1 The system must be able to create, modify, and delete instructor information including name, address, bio, and stipend.
Q2 Instructors must be able to update course information and materials.
5. Maintain the Course Schedule
Q1 The system must maintain the course schedule in its central database including course title, course number, course description, course prerequisites, length of course, course outline, schedule dates, and instructor information.
Q2 The system must allow the schedule administrator to maintain the course schedule and create, modify, and delete course schedule information.
6. Search the Course Schedule
Q1 Customers must be able to search the Course Schedule by various search techniques including keyword, title, and schedule and then view the results
7. Develop a scalable architecture
Q.1 The training application must be capable of maintaining user accounts for up to 100,000 user accounts during the first six month and 1,000,000 after six months.
Q.2 The training application must be capable of servicing up to 1,000 simultaneous users initially and up to 10,000 after six months.
Q.3 The training application must be capable of handling 100 search requests per minute and up to 1,000 search requests after six months.
Q.4 The training application must be ca
What are the criteria that the supreme court has develop
What are the criteria that the supreme court has develop
Science
In responding to PART I below your CONCLUSION (that is prediction of what outcome the Supreme Court would reach) is virtually irrelevant. Instead you should focus on two kinds of concerns:
(1) what are the criteria that the Supreme Court has developed for responding to the problem set forth and
(2) how do those criteria fit the mission of the Supreme Court specifically, and the judicial branch generally under the Madison’s, Marshall’s and Hamilton’s (“Framers'”) visions of government?
The instructions about essay writing from the first two exercises again are modified to fit THIS assignment. Question 3 requires you to “brief” Supreme Court opinions and there are special instructions in that prompt to guide your formatting. The prompt for Questions 1 & 2 require responses that will almost certainly be longer than 7 paragraphs. Nonetheless you should write short sentences with active voice verbs and strive to write tightly organized paragraphs. The best papers will have first and last paragraphs that introduce and summarize your analysis.
The “middle paragraphs” should be the essence of your analysis. One sentence (generally the last one) in each of the middle paragraphs should either be in bold or underlined to emphasize the main point of the paragraph. You should write those “main point” sentences first. Then build your middle paragraphs around each of them. Finally after you complete the middle paragraphs, draft your first and last paragraphs, to provide structure for the middle paragraphs.
No paragraph should be longer than 6 sentences. Most will be around four sentences. Most sentences should be no longer than 8 words.
The exercise requires no research. Since the problems are largely fictional and hypothetical, research would probably be more counterproductive than helpful. It is mandatory for all students. No late papers will be accepted. Keep a copy of your paper in the event your original is misplaced.
1. The Misery State University School of Medicine has an elaborate and nuanced student admission’s policy.
It deemphasizes grades and standardized test scores. It includes such “intangible” factors as life experiences like family background, economic circumstances and race ethnicity and gender of the candidate. The objective of the admissions program is to develop a highly diverse group of medical students who as doctors will be better able to serve the highly diverse population of Misery.
No racial or gender “quotas” are established, but “points” on an admission score sheet are given to candidates who meet some of the diversity goals identified above in the admissions process. Points can be earned by members of specified racial or ethnic groups. And of course those not members of those groups find themselves less competitive in the admissions process.
A. Discuss whether the Misery State’s admissions policies are compatible with the Supreme Court’s 14th Amendment equal protection decisions in culminating in Brown v Board of Education.
B. How does the approach to racial classifications set forth in Brown fit the role for the judiciary set forth by the Hamilton and Marshall? Consider specifically the lessons of Marbury and Dred Scott particularly as applied in situations described above such as Brown and the Misery admissions process?
2 The following is a portion of an email from a college president to her campus community.
You understand that, despite the best efforts and intentions of [my] administration, [that] racist, sexist, and otherwise offensive and abhorrent messages continue to be posted to the Yik Yak social media platform. I would like the entire campus community to be aware that we continue to investigate these actions. While we respect and honor the First Amendment rights of all members of our community, and encourage robust discussion of issues, it is important to note that the First Amendment does not protect speech that consists of true threats, incitement to imminent lawless action, and fighting words-words expressed to incite hatred or violence by the listener. This type of speech, as well as speech that intentionally and maliciously intimidates, ridicules, or humiliates others is also not permissible under the [state University’s] Code of Student Conduct. We will continue to pursue the determination of responsibility for these actions with vigor.
A. Is the president’s analysis of the scope of protected First Amendment expression consistent with that of the US Supreme Court particularly in light of the Alvarez opinion?
B. How does the approach that the Supreme Court has developed for analyzing First Amendment questions fit the role for the judiciary set forth by the Hamilton and Marshall?
3. Brief one of the following cases:
UNITED STATES V ALVAREZ
OBERGEFELL V HODGES
GIDEON V WAINWRIGHT
Brown v Board of Education
Role of systems analyst in system development life cycle
Role of systems analyst in system development life cycle
Software Engineering
1.What are the primary responsibilities of a system analyst? What skills do system analysts need? Discuss the role the systems analyst plays in the system development lifecycle. Is there a significant difference between typical salaries for system analysts, designers, and developers? Roughly, what is the difference between typical salaries for these different groups? What do you think are the reasons for these differences? Discuss any trends that you found and the implications.
Develop three written arguments in support of your thesis
Develop three written arguments in support of your thesis
Science
For your course project, you will write a short paper on a specific topic or problem dealing with a subject from the natural sciences.
In this assignment, you will prepare arguments in support of and in opposition to your topic. If you have difficulties in formulating arguments, please contact your instructor for guidance.
In this assignment, complete the following:
Develop three written arguments in support of your thesis.
Develop three written arguments in opposition to your thesis.
Be sure to include the following:
Support your arguments with reasons and scholarly references.
Provide evidence from your textbook or an external reference to support your arguments. The external reference can be from a reliable source on the Internet or a book/journal article from the Argosy University Online Library.
Each written argument should be at least a paragraph in length.
Note: These arguments cannot be statements of your own opinions. They must be supported by scholarly references.
Diversity that staff should follow
Diversity that staff should follow
Science
Part 2: In 2-3 short paragraphs, discuss how you might educate a patient about proper management of infectious materials at home, emphasizing the importance of frequent and consistent hand washing. Be sure to discuss the infectious material in your discussion.
Part 3: Working with Culturally Diverse Patients Mr. Jamaal has recently immigrated from the Middle East to live with his son and daughter-in-law. The Jamaal family are now established patients that are seeking treatment at the medical practice you work at as a Medical Assistant. They have been seeking care at your facility for the past six months. You have noticed that they continually arrive late for all of their appointments to date. They arrive late again for Mr. Jamaal’s appointment today and seem reluctant to answer many of the screening questions asked. Also, it is observed that Mr. Jamaal allows his son to speak for him more of the visit. Based on some preliminary testing that was conducted at the last visit two weeks ago, Dr. Smith is concerned that Mr. Jamaal may have cancer, but must order additional diagnostic testing to confirm his suspicions.
Based on this scenario, what information should the medical staff be aware of to assist in effectively interacting with the patient? Are there specific guidelines related to multicultural background and diversity that staff should follow? If so, what may this be?
Reviewed and reported on professional associations
Reviewed and reported on professional associations
Science
Reviewed and reported on professional associations supporting the field of psychology. What did you find most helpful and what did you find not helpful or missing from these organizations’ websites?
Need a Research paper /Psychology
Need a Research paper  /Psychology
research and citing appropriately. Submit your paper to the M4 Assignment 2 Dropbox. Turnitin is integrated into the Dropbox. When you submit your paper, it will be run through the TurnItIn software, and you will be able to review your Originality Report soon after submission. If your TurnItIn score is not in the green range, be sure to make the appropriate changes as noted on the TurnItIn report.
For guidance on organizing your paper, refer back to the outline you created in Module 3 as well as any feedback you received on your outline.
You will want to review your work by using the checklist provided below:
You have a single point that is conveyed through your thesis statement.
Your paper makes a logical argument that can be supported with credible research.
Your paper is well organized and you know your audience.
You receive a TurnItIn report in the green range.
You are able to understand your opposition, and you respond well to the claims of your opposition.
You cite at least 6 reliable sources (8 in the Module 5 submission).
You use correct in-text citations.
Your references page is correctly formatted.
You show a strong command of vocabulary, grammar, and punctuation.Argosy University
Introduction
For clinicians, the hardest challenge is perhaps knowing the right way to handle patients who require pain medication, yet they have a history of addiction to drugs. When speaking about pain medication, opioids are among the first class of drugs to come to mind. There is also a clash that exists between prescribing opioid medication to patients with a history of heroin abuse. Most doctors, fearing the legal ramifications of their actions, often shy away from overprescribing pain medication to patients with a history of drug abuse. There are numerous misconceptions surrounding this topic, such as patients with chronic pain symptoms encountering physicians who do not have enough experience to handle their unique needs. Important to note is that, the main issue of concern is knowing the right way to treat a patient with a history of drug abuse without causing abstinent patients to relapse, or to administer low dosages of pain medication which may lead to the patients being discharged before the right time for their therapy has elapsed, or even designing the proper care interventions that will ensure patients do not relapse.
Topic Sentences for the Supporting Points
There exists no perfect formula for calculating the right amount of opioid doses to administer for pain medication therapies. There are no studies that deeply delve into the issue of how patients with a history of substance abuse should be handled when it comes to administering pain medication to them. For the patients already using opioids illegally, there is a serious challenge during pain management should a time come when they require such interventions (Michna, 2004). With the current legal system, physicians may face legal ramifications for an overdosage of pain medication, meaning they are almost always afraid to make prescriptions.
In the medical world also, there exists a complicated relationship between pain management and patients with addiction problems. Physicians may discharge patients early from pain management programs, meaning the patients encounter problems both in regard to pain and also in regard to their drug abuse problem (Martell, 2007). More so, improper communication has made physicians shy away from taking on patients with drug abuse problems, especially since opioids are the basic components required for pain management, and administering such medication exposes the patients to a high risk of a relapse during or after the pain management therapy.
Lastly, the bureaucracies associated with pain management for patients with drug abuse problems make it difficult for healthcare settings to properly do their work. Notably, physicians lack the proper support from their healthcare facilities to address pain management for patients who have a history of drug abuse (Gourlay, 2005). The lack of acute management teams in most facilities also means that for a healthcare facility to take on patients struggling with drug use, there needs to be written procedures and policies, which are mostly not properly adhered to.
Counter Arguments
One of the main problems encountered by physicians is the determination of the right amount of pain medication to prescribe to a patient struggling with drug use, or on who was a drug user in the past. A counter argument for this is the fact that, doctors can ascertain the amount of pain being experienced by the patient, and then tailoring their dosage prescriptions to much the level of pain. This is however difficult to do since it is not possible to accurately determine how much pain the patient is in.
The pain medication given to patients needs to be regulated. Access to more pain medication drugs may lead to a false sense of pain in the patients. Knowing the pain medication is at their disposal, patients may take medication for pain that is not serious enough to warrant medication (Thorn, 2017).
Finally, pain medication should be administered through a third party, and not directly to the patient. This may work to reduce the possibility of a relapse in the patients. Therefore, administration of pain medication, especially opioids, should be structured in such a way that patients have limited direct access to the medication (Chou, 2009). The medication is only availed to the patients at the prescribed times and for the prescribed amount of time.
Conclusion
It is very difficult to properly ascertain the amount of pain that a patient is going through. The limited nature of research into the correlation between pain therapy and patients with a history of drug use also makes it difficult to properly match the level of pain as described by the patient, with the right pain medication dosage. With the current legal system defining the conduct of healthcare practitioners, most physicians are afraid of the legal issues they may face when they are accused of prescribing more opioid pain medication that is supposed to be.
References
Chou, R., Fanciullo, G. J., Fine, P. G., Adler, J. A., Ballantyne, J. C., Davies, P., … & Gilson, A. M. (2009). Clinical guidelines for the use of chronic opioid therapy for chronic noncancer pain. The Journal of Pain, 10(2), 113-130.
Gourlay, D. L., Heit, H. A., & Almahrezi, A. (2005). Universal precautions in pain medicine: a rational approach to the treatment of chronic pain. Pain Medicine, 6(2), 107-112.
Martell, B. A., O’Connor, P. G., Kerns, R. D., Becker, W. C., Morales, K. H., Kosten, T. R., & Fiellin, D. A. (2007). Systematic review: opioid treatment for chronic back pain: prevalence, efficacy, and association with addiction. Annals of internal medicine, 146(2), 116-127.
Michna, E., Ross, E. L., Hynes, W. L., Nedeljkovic, S. S., Soumekh, S., Janfaza, D., … & Jamison, R. N. (2004). Predicting aberrant drug behavior in patients treated for chronic pain: the importance of abuse history. Journal of pain and symptom management, 28(3), 250-258.
Thorn, B. E. (2017). Cognitive therapy for chronic pain: a step-by-step guide. Guilford Publications.
Need a Research /Psychology
research and citing appropriately. Submit your paper to the M4 Assignment 2 Dropbox. Turnitin is integrated into the Dropbox. When you submit your paper, it will be run through the TurnItIn software, and you will be able to review your Originality Report soon after submission. If your TurnItIn score is not in the green range, be sure to make the appropriate changes as noted on the TurnItIn report.
For guidance on organizing your paper, refer back to the outline you created in Module 3 as well as any feedback you received on your outline.
You will want to review your work by using the checklist provided below:
You have a single point that is conveyed through your thesis statement.
Your paper makes a logical argument that can be supported with credible research.
Your paper is well organized and you know your audience.
You receive a TurnItIn report in the green range.
You are able to understand your opposition, and you respond well to the claims of your opposition.
You cite at least 6 reliable sources (8 in the Module 5 submission).
You use correct in-text citations.
Your references page is correctly formatted.
You show a strong command of vocabulary, grammar, and punctuation.Argosy University
Introduction
For clinicians, the hardest challenge is perhaps knowing the right way to handle patients who require pain medication, yet they have a history of addiction to drugs. When speaking about pain medication, opioids are among the first class of drugs to come to mind. There is also a clash that exists between prescribing opioid medication to patients with a history of heroin abuse. Most doctors, fearing the legal ramifications of their actions, often shy away from overprescribing pain medication to patients with a history of drug abuse. There are numerous misconceptions surrounding this topic, such as patients with chronic pain symptoms encountering physicians who do not have enough experience to handle their unique needs. Important to note is that, the main issue of concern is knowing the right way to treat a patient with a history of drug abuse without causing abstinent patients to relapse, or to administer low dosages of pain medication which may lead to the patients being discharged before the right time for their therapy has elapsed, or even designing the proper care interventions that will ensure patients do not relapse.
Topic Sentences for the Supporting Points
There exists no perfect formula for calculating the right amount of opioid doses to administer for pain medication therapies. There are no studies that deeply delve into the issue of how patients with a history of substance abuse should be handled when it comes to administering pain medication to them. For the patients already using opioids illegally, there is a serious challenge during pain management should a time come when they require such interventions (Michna, 2004). With the current legal system, physicians may face legal ramifications for an overdosage of pain medication, meaning they are almost always afraid to make prescriptions.
In the medical world also, there exists a complicated relationship between pain management and patients with addiction problems. Physicians may discharge patients early from pain management programs, meaning the patients encounter problems both in regard to pain and also in regard to their drug abuse problem (Martell, 2007). More so, improper communication has made physicians shy away from taking on patients with drug abuse problems, especially since opioids are the basic components required for pain management, and administering such medication exposes the patients to a high risk of a relapse during or after the pain management therapy.
Lastly, the bureaucracies associated with pain management for patients with drug abuse problems make it difficult for healthcare settings to properly do their work. Notably, physicians lack the proper support from their healthcare facilities to address pain management for patients who have a history of drug abuse (Gourlay, 2005). The lack of acute management teams in most facilities also means that for a healthcare facility to take on patients struggling with drug use, there needs to be written procedures and policies, which are mostly not properly adhered to.
Counter Arguments
One of the main problems encountered by physicians is the determination of the right amount of pain medication to prescribe to a patient struggling with drug use, or on who was a drug user in the past. A counter argument for this is the fact that, doctors can ascertain the amount of pain being experienced by the patient, and then tailoring their dosage prescriptions to much the level of pain. This is however difficult to do since it is not possible to accurately determine how much pain the patient is in.
The pain medication given to patients needs to be regulated. Access to more pain medication drugs may lead to a false sense of pain in the patients. Knowing the pain medication is at their disposal, patients may take medication for pain that is not serious enough to warrant medication (Thorn, 2017).
Finally, pain medication should be administered through a third party, and not directly to the patient. This may work to reduce the possibility of a relapse in the patients. Therefore, administration of pain medication, especially opioids, should be structured in such a way that patients have limited direct access to the medication (Chou, 2009). The medication is only availed to the patients at the prescribed times and for the prescribed amount of time.
Conclusion
It is very difficult to properly ascertain the amount of pain that a patient is going through. The limited nature of research into the correlation between pain therapy and patients with a history of drug use also makes it difficult to properly match the level of pain as described by the patient, with the right pain medication dosage. With the current legal system defining the conduct of healthcare practitioners, most physicians are afraid of the legal issues they may face when they are accused of prescribing more opioid pain medication that is supposed to be.
References
Chou, R., Fanciullo, G. J., Fine, P. G., Adler, J. A., Ballantyne, J. C., Davies, P., … & Gilson, A. M. (2009). Clinical guidelines for the use of chronic opioid therapy for chronic noncancer pain. The Journal of Pain, 10(2), 113-130.
Gourlay, D. L., Heit, H. A., & Almahrezi, A. (2005). Universal precautions in pain medicine: a rational approach to the treatment of chronic pain. Pain Medicine, 6(2), 107-112.
Martell, B. A., O’Connor, P. G., Kerns, R. D., Becker, W. C., Morales, K. H., Kosten, T. R., & Fiellin, D. A. (2007). Systematic review: opioid treatment for chronic back pain: prevalence, efficacy, and association with addiction. Annals of internal medicine, 146(2), 116-127.
Michna, E., Ross, E. L., Hynes, W. L., Nedeljkovic, S. S., Soumekh, S., Janfaza, D., … & Jamison, R. N. (2004). Predicting aberrant drug behavior in patients treated for chronic pain: the importance of abuse history. Journal of pain and symptom management, 28(3), 250-258.
Thorn, B. E. (2017). Cognitive therapy for chronic pain: a step-by-step guide. Guilford Publications.
Needs it Original – American History Art
how art reflects the society in which it was made that responds to the following: