Blog

Terrorism

Write a very powerful essay with 3 references and proper citations of no more than 400 words. No Plagiarism must be in your own words and No Chat GPT.

 

Topic:

Discuss how the threat of chemical, nuclear, and biological (NBC) warfare can easily pose a threat to any democracy.

 

Literacy Instructional Strategies Assignment

My grade level and content area of licensure is Physical Education EC-12.

 

The website of the TEKs for my content area are provided here to use.

 

https://texreg.sos.state.tx.us/public/readtac$ext.ViewTAC?tac_view=4&ti=19&pt=2&ch=116

 

The attachments has the instructions for the assignment and the template the instructor would like. Also includes the rubric and a word document of Tips to help with understanding on what they are looking for.

 

Not sure how many pages or sources there will be.

drones for Darden Aircraft

In preparing this research paper, you will design and implement a solution using creative thinking and problem-solving skills

Your research paper needs to be complete.  Write the paper from the outline notes Data File, referencing all sources of information and follow the guidelines identified in the MLA documentation style.  The sentences within the paragraphs should be organized so that they have a natural flow.  The notes in the Data File are in random order and are not in a natural flow. 

Quality Assessment Project

Quality Assessment Project

Project Overview

 

For this project, you will identify an organization in your chosen field and conduct an analysis on the facility, process, or work flow of interest. You will choose three analytic tools among those introduced in this course (data summary, control chart, process capability analysis, pareto chart, scatter plot and correlation coefficient, and regression analysis) and use them to assess your process of interest. Before analysis, you have to identify the available data or gather your own data related to the process and check if your choice of analytic tool is compatible with the data.

Reference the Quality Assessment Scoring Guide [DOCX] Quality Assessment Scoring Guide [DOCX] – Alternative Formats  for grading details.

Getting Started

 

Examine your own job, workplace, local business, family business, or friend’s workplace and apply what you have learned in class to their problems and contexts. Reference the Course Schedule located in the Course Menu for project checkpoints. These checkpoints are not strict due dates, but do provide some structure to keep you on track. The checkpoints will also be indicated in the module. To assist you there is a Help Wanted Discussion where you can post questions to your instructor and peers.

Directions

 

• Choose the process or work flow.
• Gather data.
• Choose analytic tools and conduct analysis.
• Write a report using the outline provided below.

Suggested Outline of Report:

 

Use the following suggested outline to organize your report. You may have to rearrange the order depending on your analysis so create an outline that makes sense for your report.

• Background (Introduction, Assessment Purpose, Context, and Setting)
• Data Sources and Collection
• Analysis Plan
• Results and Interpretation
• Conclusion (Discussion of Findings, Recommendations, and Conclusion)

Format

 

Create and format your document in MS Word using the following guidelines:

• The report should be 5-7 pages in length (roughly one page per section, depending on graphics and table, etc.) You should be able to discuss the analytic results and assess the process using a non-technical language; however, this does not mean to use informal language or slang — write in a formal tone, organizing content for flow, and check for proper grammar, sentence structure, and spelling.
• 12-point, Times New Roman Font, with 1-inch margins, double-spaced
• APA 6th edition formatting
• Save the document as “Lastname_QualityAssessment.”
• Submit your report as an attachment.

Case Study on Moral Status

Assignment Details:

-Based on “Case Study: Fetal Abnormality” (see attached file) and the required topic resources, write a reflective essay that answers the following questions:

1. What is the Christian view of the nature of human persons, and which theory of moral status is it compatible with? How is this related to the intrinsic human value and dignity?
2. Which theory or theories are being used by Jessica, Marco, Maria, and Dr. Wilson to determine the moral status of the fetus? What from the case study specifically leads you to believe that they hold the theory you selected?
3. How does the theory determine or influence each of their recommendations for action?
4. What theory do you agree with? Why? How would that theory determine or influence the recommendation for action?

-Remember to support your responses with the topic resources.

-While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected; this includes having an introduction in which the aim of the paper is clearly mentioned and a conclusion in which all thoughts and views are summarized for the reader.

-Documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines

 

COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRIC EVALUATION NOTE AND PATIENT CASE PRESENTATION

In your presentation:

• Dress professionally and present yourself in a professional manner.
• Display your photo ID at the start of the video when you introduce yourself.
• Ensure that you do not include any information that violates the principles of HIPAA (i.e., don’t use the patient’s name or any other identifying information).
• Present the full complex case study. Be succinct in your presentation, and do not exceed 8 minutes. Include subjective and objective data; assessment from most recent mental status exam; current psychiatric diagnosis including differentials that were ruled out; current psychotherapeutic plan (include one health promotion activity and one patient education strategy you provided); and patient progress toward treatment goals.
  • Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding their chief complaint and symptomology to derive your differential diagnosis? What was the duration and severity of their symptoms? How are their symptoms impacting their functioning in life?
  • Objective: What observations did you make during the psychiatric assessment?
  • Assessment: Discuss the patient’s mental status examination results. What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses in order of highest to lowest priority and explain why you chose them. What was your primary diagnosis and why? Describe how your primary diagnosis aligns with DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria and is supported by the patient’s symptoms.
  • Plan: Describe your treatment modality and your plan for psychotherapy. Explain the principles of psychotherapy that underline your chosen treatment plan to support your rationale for the chosen psychotherapy framework. What were your follow-up plan and parameters? What referrals would you make or recommend as a result of this psychotherapy session?
  • Reflection notes: What would you do differently in a similar patient evaluation? Reflect on one social determinant of health according to the HealthyPeople 2030 (you will need to research) as applied to this case in the realm of psychiatry and mental health. As a future advanced provider, what are one health promotion activity and one patient education consideration for this patient for improving health disparities and inequities in the realm of psychiatry and mental health? Demonstrate your critical thinking.

BY DAY 7

Submit your Video and Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Note. You must submit two files for the evaluation note, including a Word document and scanned pdf/images the completed assignment signed by your Preceptor.

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area. 

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK4Assgn2+last name+first initial.
2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

PRAC_6645_Week4_Assignment2_Rubric

 

Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePhoto ID display and professional attire	5 to >0.0 pts Excellent Photo ID is displayed. The student is dressed professionally.   0 pts Fair   0 pts Good   0 pts Poor Photo ID is not displayed. Student must remedy this before grade is posted. The student is not dressed professionally.	5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTime	5 to >3.0 pts Excellent The video does not exceed the 8-minute time limit.   3 to >0.0 pts Good The video exceeds the 8-minute time limit. (Note: Information presented after 8 minutes will not be evaluated for grade inclusion.)   0 pts Fair   0 pts Poor	5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscuss Subjective data:• Chief complaint• History of present illness (HPI)• Medications• Psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis• Pertinent histories and/or ROS	10 to >8.0 pts Excellent The video accurately and concisely presents the patient’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, and pertinent histories and/or review of systems that would inform a differential diagnosis.   8 to >7.0 pts Good The video accurately presents the patient’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, and pertinent histories and/or review of systems that would inform a differential diagnosis.   7 to >6.0 pts Fair The video presents the patient’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, and pertinent histories and/or review of systems that would inform a differential diagnosis, but is somewhat vague or contains minor inaccuracies.   6 to >0 pts Poor The video presents an incomplete, inaccurate, or unnecessarily detailed/verbose description of the patient’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, and pertinent histories and/or review of systems that would inform a differential diagnosis. Or subjective documentation is missing.	10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscuss Objective data:• Physical exam documentation of systems pertinent to the chief complaint, HPI, and history• Diagnostic results, including any labs, imaging, or other assessments needed to develop the differential diagnoses	10 to >8.0 pts Excellent The video accurately and concisely documents the patient’s physical exam for pertinent systems. Pertinent diagnostic tests and their results are documented, as applicable.   8 to >7.0 pts Good The response accurately documents the patient’s physical exam for pertinent systems. Diagnostic tests and their results are documented, as applicable.   7 to >6.0 pts Fair Documentation of the patient’s physical exam is somewhat vague or contains minor inaccuracies. Diagnostic tests and their results are documented but contain inaccuracies.   6 to >0 pts Poor The response provides incomplete, inaccurate, or unnecessarily detailed/verbose documentation of the patient’s physical exam. Systems may have been unnecessarily reviewed, or objective documentation is missing.	10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscuss results of Assessment:• Results of the mental status examination• Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses in order of highest to lowest priority and explain why you chose them. What was your primary diagnosis and why? Describe how your primary diagnosis aligns with DSM-5 diagnostic criteria and is supported by the patient’s symptoms.	20 to >17.0 pts Excellent The video accurately documents the results of the mental status exam…. Video presents at least three differentials in order of priority for a differential diagnosis of the patient, and a rationale for their selection. Response justifies the primary diagnosis and how it aligns with DSM-5 criteria.   17 to >15.0 pts Good The video adequately documents the results of the mental status exam…. Video presents three differentials for the patient and a rationale for their selection. Response adequately justifies the primary diagnosis and how it aligns with DSM-5 criteria.   15 to >13.0 pts Fair The video presents the results of the mental status exam, with some vagueness or inaccuracy…. Video presents three differentials for the patient and a rationale for their selection. Response somewhat vaguely justifies the primary diagnosis and how it aligns with DSM-5 criteria.   13 to >0 pts Poor The response provides an incomplete, inaccurate, or unnecessarily detailed/verbose description of the results of the mental status exam and explanation of the differential diagnoses. Or assessment documentation is missing.	20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscuss treatment Plan:• A treatment plan for the patient that addresses psychotherapy and rationales including a plan for follow-up parameters and referrals	20 to >17.0 pts Excellent The video clearly and concisely outlines an evidence-based treatment plan for the patient that addresses treatment modality, psychotherapy choice with framework principles, and rationale. … Discussion includes a clear and concise follow-up plan and parameters…. The discussion includes a clear and concise referral plan.   17 to >15.0 pts Good The video clearly outlines an appropriate treatment plan without evidence-based discussion for the patient that addresses treatment modality, psychotherapy choice with framework principles, and rationale. … Discussion includes a clear follow-up plan and parameters…. The discussion includes a clear referral plan.   15 to >13.0 pts Fair The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately outlines a treatment plan for the patient and provides a rationale for the treatment approaches recommended…. The discussion is somewhat vague or inaccurate regarding the follow-up plan and parameters…. The discussion is somewhat vague or inaccurate regarding a referral plan.   13 to >0 pts Poor The response does not address the treatment plan or the treatment plan is not appropriate for the assessment and the diagnosis or is missing elements of the treatment plan. … There is no discussion for follow-up and parameters. … There is no discussion of a referral plan.	20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflections on this case.	5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Reflections are thorough, thoughtful, and demonstrate critical thinking. … Reflections contain all 3 elements from the assignment directions including a discussion demonstrating critical thinking of the case related to the HealthyPeople 2030 social health determinates. Clearly and concisely relates discussion to the psychiatric and mental health field.   4 to >3.5 pts Good Reflections demonstrate critical thinking. … Reflections demonstrate critical thinking. … Reflections contain 2 of the elements from the assignment directions with one being a basic discussion of the case related to the HealthyPeople 2030 social health determinates. Clearly relates discussion to the psychiatric and mental health field.   3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair Reflections are somewhat general or do not demonstrate critical thinking. … Reflections contain 1 of the required elements from the assignment directions which is the HealthyPeople 2030 social health determinates. … Somewhat vaguely or inaccurately relates discussion to the psychiatric and mental health field.   3 to >0 pts Poor Reflections are incomplete, inaccurate, or missing. … There are no Reflections elements from the assignment directions (no HeathlyPeople 2030 social health determinates, no health promotion, and no education activity). … Missing discussion relating to the psychiatric and mental health field or relates discussion to another specialty realm including medical co-morbidity illnesses.	5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation documentation	20 to >17.0 pts Excellent The response clearly, accurately, and thoroughly follows the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation format to document the selected patient case. Preceptor signature and date pdf/image is uploaded on the completed assignment (not an electronic signature).   17 to >15.0 pts Good The response accurately follows the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation format to document the selected patient case. Preceptor signature and date pdf/image is uploaded on the completed assignment but is an electronic signature.   15 to >13.0 pts Fair The response follows the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation format to document the selected patient case, with some vagueness and inaccuracy Preceptor signature and date pdf/image is uploaded on the completed assignment but is an electronic signature.   13 to >0 pts Poor The response incompletely and inaccurately follows the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation format to document the selected patient case. No preceptor signature.	20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation style	5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Presentation style is exceptionally clear, professional, and focused.   4 to >3.5 pts Good Presentation style is clear, professional, and focused.   3.5 to >2.0 pts Fair Presentation style is mostly clear, professional, and focused.   2 to >0 pts Poor Presentation style is unclear, unprofessional, and/or unfocused.	5 pts
Total Points: 100

 

PreviousNext

 

Terrorism

Write an essay on the topic listed below, this assignment requires 400 words or more. 

REFERENCES: You must employ a minimum of three (3) scholarly and professional references for your work. This assignment must be in your own words no plagiarism, No Chat GPT

(1) Explain the role the Taliban played in the development of Afghanistan after the Soviet invasion. 

Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory

Assessment Description:

Based on the required topic Resources, write a reflection about worldview and respond to following:

Part 1: In 250-300 words, explain the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism within health care.

 

Part 2: In 250-300 words, explain what scientism is and describe two of the main arguments against it.

Part 3: In 750-1,000 words, answer each of the worldview questions according to your own personal perspective and worldview:

1. What is ultimate reality?
2. What is the nature of the universe?
3. What is a human being?
4. What is knowledge?
5. What is your basis of ethics?
6. What is the purpose of your existence?  

– Support your reflection with the topic resources.

– APA style is not required for the body of this assignment but solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines.

-This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

question 6

What factors account for the considerable amount of attention corporate governance receives from several parties, including shareholder activists, business press writers, and academic scholars?

(Does not have to be a complete page if not necessary)

Terrorism

CITATIONS AND QUOTES: Required to indicate the professional sources employed during your analysis. Failure to offer this information will result in an opinion paper, which holds no value. 

                                                                                                           

REFERENCES: You must employ a minimum of three (3) scholarly and professional references for your work. You are allowed to use your textbook for research but must offer additional references as well. Please refrain from using unauthorized references such as Wikipedia, social media, etc. You are welcome to use websites ending in edu, gov, org – because these are professional or educational sites with credible information. All references employed for this analysis must be within the last five (5) years. This essay must have a minimum of 400 words.   

No Plagiarism 

                                                                                                                                                                  

In an effort to cover the objectives listed on the syllabus for this course, the question chosen for discussion is below.

 Discuss the reaction to left-wing terrorism in Germany.