Blog

programming with C

programming with C

 

programming with C

 

Assignment

1 Write a program that will first allow a user to choose one of two options:

1. Convert a temperature from degrees Celsius to degrees Fahrenheit. 2. Convert a temperature from degrees Fahrenheit to degrees Celsius.

The program should then prompt for the temperature value to be entered and output the new value that results from the conversion. To convert from Celsius to Fahrenheit
you can multiply the value by 1.8 and then add 32. To convert from Fahrenheit to Celsius, you can subtract 32 from the value, then multiply by 5, and divide the result
by 9.

2 Write a program that takes 4 numbers a, b, c and d, then find and prints the minimum value.

3 Write a program that prompts the user to enter the date as three integer values for the month, the day in the month, and the year. The program should then output the
date in the form 31st December 2016 when the user enters 12 31 2016, for example. You will need to work out when th, nd, st, and rd need to be appended to the day
value. Don’t forget 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th… 11th, 12th, 13th, 14th; and 21st, 22nd, 23rd, and 24th,etc..

1- FILE NAME
SUBMIT ONE FILE FOR ALL YOUR PROGRAMS.
Always add your Firstname_lastname_assignment_X to the filename where X=assignment number.
2- FILE EXTENSION
Sumbit as .c file that I can compile and execute directly with dev c++.
3- DO NOT SUBMIT TEXT FILES OR .doc, .docx or pdf FILES
3- COMMENTS IN PROGRAM
Always add comments inside your program to explain the code. You can use // at the beginning to add comments. Comment out all those sections that are text
explanations in the code.
Example
// Your Name, Program Name, Question number
// Explanation here
4- COMMENT SECTIONS OF CODE FOR ALL QUESTIONS
After finishing and testing your program
Use
/* <program text> */
for all program sections or for separating Question Code. I will un-comment to compile and run each program to see your work.
Example:
// Q1 code
/* Your program code goes below
*/
// Q2 code below (Same as above)
========================== MORE DETAILS BELOW ========
Example one .c file. The file should look like as follows.

// Your name and ID

// program 1 code version 1
/* Tell what program one version 1 does … etc..
……
Add all the explanations etc. as required tht you answer the questions and show that you understand the code
*/

Program 1 code // version 1
Here you have your code for program 1 version 1
(Make sure to add your comments in code also always and as necessary to explain the program step)

/* At the end of program provide your inputs outputs and console printout as a comment
for version 1. This is multiple lines enclosed in comment start and end
*/
//————————————————————————
// program 1 code version 2 (IF REQUIRED in ASSIGNMENT)
/* Tell what program one does … etc..
……
Add all the explanations etc.
*/
//
Program 1 code // version 2
Here you have code for program 1 version 2 with comments
……
* At the end of program provide your inputs outputs and console printout as a comment
for version 2 etc. This is multiple lines enclosed in comment start and end
*/
/—————————————————————-
Follow same above style for all your programs (program 2, 3 .. etc.)

For your own testing you can test programs as separate files but you must send me the same code with plenty of comments in one .c file.

REMEMBER when you submit everything must be in one .c file and the name of file “fistname_lastname_assignmentX.c” where X = assignment number before submitting.

 

biology or genetics

biology or genetics

 

As part of out class introduction, please write a short response (upload back to Moodle) regarding the following:

what do I find interesting about biology or genetics
I would like to learn more about the following in class this term……..

 

hist4 Arnold, History, A Very Short Introduction

hist4 Arnold, History, A Very Short Introduction

 

hist4

 

Arnold,
History, A Very Short Introduction
, Chapters 3
and
4
Is an antiquarian the same as a historian?
Are there ever motives behind the writing of history?
How can storytelling be history?
How can history speak to us about hum
an nature?
Is it possible to make history “true?”
5
Is what we do with evidence more meaningful than how we present it
Are personal journals reliable sources?
What are sources?
Is bias useful in sources and if so, how might it be useful?
What can a document
tell us?
Why do nuances matter?
Do sources speak for themselves?
What might be the greatest challenge for historians?
Summary/reaction essay

 

 

Human societies Imagine you are responsible for creating a study in which you answer the following research question: “What percentage of people wash their hands after using the public restroom?”

Human societies Imagine you are responsible for creating a study in which you answer the following research question: “What percentage of people wash their hands after using the public restroom?”

Human societies

 

Imagine you are responsible for creating a study in which you answer the following research question: “What percentage of people wash their hands after using the
public restroom?”
*How would you structure the study? What data would you collect?
*What possible complications could arise? How could you avoid or deal with them?

Your response should be about 2 paragraphs in length (one for each of the two sets of questions above).

 

differences between photography and art

differences between photography and art

Introduction to Humanities 50 words each

Are there any differences between photography and art? And certainly what are the differences between photography as an art form and Impressionism as an art form? Are there any between photography and Realism do you think? Comments?

how do you think the morphing of the standalone SLR camera into the smartphone with its built-in camera has made a difference to photography

What distinguishes naturalism from realism

Discuss changes that you would make to your local budget

Discuss changes that you would make to your local budget

ENGLISH COMPOSITION

Unit V Article Critique

Access the CSU Online Library. Within the database “Academic OneFile,” locate and read the following articles:

• Gregg, G. L. (2011). “Unpopular vote: Enemies of the Electoral College aim to scrap the Founders’ design? The American Conservative 10 (12), 33+.

• Underhill, W. (2012). Changing up the Electoral College? State Legislatures, 38(1), 9.

Upon reading the two articles, write a response essay of at least 500 words. Your essay should address the Electoral College as it currently functions, as well as the proposed changes discussed in the two articles. Are you in support of the current Electoral College? Do you agree or disagree with the proposed changes? Is it right for states to circumvent the Constitution on this matter? Your essay should be well thought out and include direct references to the articles. Limited direct quotes are permitted. All references (paraphrased or quoted) should be correctly cited using APA format.

Unit VIII Final Project

Locate and evaluate a periodical or newspaper article in print or online (e.g„ Wall Street Journal, New York Times, Time magazine, The Economist, Forbes) that details an economic issue on the local, state, or federal level. Make sure that the article is dated no longer than six months ago and the article is relevant to a topic covered in the course.

Upon reading the appropriate article, write a 1000-1500 word analysis, making sure to clearly answer and include the following:

• Write a summary of the article in your own words with limited quotes or paraphrasing. All quotes and paraphrasing must have proper APA citations.

• Discuss changes that you would make to your local, state, or national budget based on the economic issue addressed in this article.

• If you feel no changes are necessary, explain how the current budget influences the circumstances in the article.

• Include your views (pro/con) on a possible amendment to the Constitution requiring a balanced federal budget.

• Identify and analyze an historical event comparable to your article’s economic issue.

Unit V Assignment

Revision of Literature Review and Introduction

Follow the directions below for the completion of the introduction and literature review revision assignment for Unit V. If you have questions, please email your professor for assistance.

Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to revise the introduction and literature review of your academic argumentative research paper, which you created a draft of in Unit IV.

Description: In this assignment, you will revise the introduction and literature review that you wrote for the Unit IV assignment. Revisions must be substantive and should be made in accordance with the professor’s instructions. The following parts of
the assignment must be revised:

•Introduction (9-12 well-developed sentences/approximately 350 words): For more details about what is expected for each of the following sentences, please see “Lesson 4: The Introduction.” You may also want to review the

“Example Introduction and Literature Review (with comments).” The following components must be included in the introduction (in the following order).

O Sentence 1: Introduce the general topic
O Sentence 2: Pro side (general)
O Sentence 3: Con side (general)
O Sentence 4: Narrowthe scope (1)
O Sentence 5: Examples of the narrowed topic
O Sentence 6: Narrow the scope (2)
O Sentence 7: Specific controversy
O Sentence 8: Pro side (specific)
O Sentence 9: Con side (specific)
O Sentence 10: The thesis

•Literature Review (800-900 words): For details about the structure of the literature review, you will want to review “Lesson 3: The Literature Review: The Process.” You may also want to review the “Example Introduction and Literature Review (with comments).” The link is below.

O Literature review preface: This paragraph acts as a guide to what the reader can expect in the literature review.

O Literature review body: This section includes three to four body paragraphs that discuss the history, terminology, and both sides of the controversy (pro and con).

O Literature review conclusion: The conclusion signals that the literature review is ending, but it also acts as a kind of preface for the body of the paper by restating the thesis statement and establishing your argument once again.