Blog

Natural to the End

Natural to the End

Natural to the End

“Stand with anybody that stands right, stand with him while he is right and part with him when he goes wrong.” – Abraham Lincoln

Loyalty cannot be bought, sold, or traded. Loyalty must be achieved through the admiration of your peers. Loyalty is giving your word and sticking to it – not compromising your morals when the going gets tough or when you are presented a better deal somewhere else. A man who is admirable possesses the traits of loyalty. Crichton is admirable and remains loyal to the end. When the time is right, he parts. Is it natural to remain loyal?

We must first establish a definition of naturalness in the framework of the text. In The Admirable Crichton, whatever is natural is right. English social hierarchy is natural to the characters in the play. Crichton possesses respect for the system, for he immersed himself in it for a great deal of his life. However, his respect does not evolve out of fear or intimidation, rather, out of his understanding of the important role masters and servants naturally play in civilization. Crichton’s immersion into and understanding of the hierarchal system explains the significance of what comes naturally in the play; moreover, it lays the foundation for his loyalty. His position on hierarchy and social order is parallel to the stance Darwin, a British naturalist, established in the 19th century; stating social adaptations, herein to hierarchy, are natural for humans. In Act I, Lord Loam and Lady Mary speak to Crichton regarding the division into classes, and they discuss if these divisions are natural or artificial.

LORD LOAM: […] can’t you see, Crichton that our divisions into classes are artificial, that if we were to return to Nature, which is the aspiration of mylife, all would be equal?

CRICHTON: The divisions into classes, my lord, are not artificial. They are the natural outcome of a civilized (sic) society. (To Lady Mary) There must always be a master and servants in all civilized (sic) communities, my lady, for it is natural, and whatever is natural is right. (Barrie 13)

The characters in the play are familiar with the idea of social order; Crichton understands this circumstance, and he employs the appropriate conditions to reach the top later in the play. He recognizes others follow whoever reaches the top first. In order to reach the top first he relies on his leadership skills, which may not be natural to mankind, but are natural to Crichton.

Leaders are not born. In no doubt, there are some natural endowments that affect relative abilities, but they are not born, they are made. Crichton has studied and understands the English system of hierarchy. His reason for remaining with the family is stated in the following text:

CRICHTON: [To Lady Mary] I should have felt compelled to give notice, my lady, if the master had not had a seat in the Upper House. I cling to that. (12)

Aware of Lord Loam’s appointment in the House of Lords, Crichton’s prolonged stay with the family is due to the prestige he acquires by remaining at hand. For the duration of his ride with the family, he undeniably gains imperative leadership traits and principles.

Leadership is characterized as the art of influencing, directing, guiding, and controlling others in such a way as to obtain their willing obedience, confidence, respect and loyal cooperation in accomplishment of an objective. Crichton acquires the notions listed above, mainly through his study and respect for the system, and moves on to accomplish the objective of filling the natural role of the master. Crichton explains that on the question of leadership – it will settle itself out. It is a matter in which he has nothing to do.

His transition to the head occurs towards the end of Act II, and the issues of birth and guarantees are replaced by skill and ability. His move to the top takes shape rather suddenly on the island, and it does not take long for the others to naturally follow behind him. In a conversation with Treherne, after the brief exit by the family, Crichton explains that the pot he heated is full of Nature, and the others are hungry and will return, for that is what is natural.

His natural succession to the position of commander and the clashes over social philosophies are noticed through dialogue when Crichton speaks to Lady Mary. Notice here, Crichton speaks, and not Lady Mary speaks; contrary to their normal social implications.

LADY MARY: (determined to have it out with him) you are not implying anything so unnatural, I hope, as that if I and my sisters don’t work there will be no dinner for us?

CRICHTON: (brightly) if it is unnatural, my lady, that is the end of

LADY MARY: If? Now I understand. The perfect servant at home

Holds that we are all equal now. I see.

CRICHTON: (earnestly) my lady, I disbelieved in equality at home because it wasagainst nature, and for that same reason I as utterly disbelieve in it on an island. (28)

The pivotal shift in Lady Mary’s point of view of Crichton, a shift in the play as a whole, comes once she recognizes Crichton as being more than a servant, for she recognizes him as a human being. The pivotal transition transpires after she realizes he did everything he could to save their own and Lord Loam’s life.

LADY MARY: You did all a man could do. Indeed I thank you, Crichton. (With some admiration and more wonder) You are a man. (27)

The shift between the social orders juxtaposed in the play, natural and adaptive, is brought to light here. The proposal of individuals being able to adapt to their surroundings and being naturally fit for a specific role in life, flourishes throughout the remainder of the island endeavor.

We have concluded that whatever objective we end up with is right. From Crichton’s point of view, social adaptations to the surroundings are a necessity and natural. We end up in current positions through nature. Crichton is someone certain to succeed on the island; he is a natural for the job. Naturalness is whatever is right.

Now we must examine the course of actions that illustrates Crichton’s loyalty. Productive leaders remain even-tempered and are calm, confident and predictable during a crisis. The key is remaining predictable at all times. His loyalty is observed easily because Crichton is predictable. Others are able to foretell his actions since Crichton is always honest first.

From the beginning Crichton is seen as the loyal servant. In a discussion with Ernest, over the topic of monthly tea-cup gatherings in the servants’ hall with the servants amid the noble, his loyalty is first noted.

ERNEST: […] you don’t approve of his lordship’s compelling his servants to be his equals – once a month?

CRICHTON: It is not for me to, sir, to disapprove of his lordship’s Radical views. (5)

Regardless of Crichton’s contempt for Ernest, he restrains from unfolding the idea as foolish and irrational; acquiescently he states the truth, and his loyalty endures. Crichton’s loyalty shins through during the crisis on the island. His loyalty gains legitimacy through his courageous and predictable actions.

Crichton conquers omnipotence on the island, and his legitimacy climaxes in Act III by his decision to summon a boat; Lord Loam was not aware of the option and even Lady Mary urges him to rethink the decision.

LORD LOAM: A ship – always a ship.

LADY MARY: Father, this is no dream.

LORD LOAM: (clutching him) you are not deceiving me?

CRICHTON: (cheerily) have no fear. I shall bring them back.

LADY MARY: Stop! (She faces him) Don’t you see what it means?

CRICHTON: (firmly) it means that our life on the island has come to a natural end.

LADY MARY: Gov., let the ship go.

CRICHTON: Bill Crichton has got to play the game. (55/56)

Crichton “plays the game” – the game of life; remaining loyal to himself and to the world by doing what is right, what is honest, and what is natural. Loyalty is composed of a special blend of personal traits specific to each individual. Some traits of loyalty include honor, courage, admiration, and commitment. Crichton holds these traits on the conditions that they are important to him, natural to him, and who he is.

Upon returning from the Island, Crichton’s loyalty is put to the test when the memoirs relative to the astonishing island survival are written, yet despite his efforts Crichton receives zero recognition in the memoirs and continues to be a nonentity. In spite of everything, in the end, Crichton’s loyalty remains at hand. While loyalty is a personal trait, some people continue to believe that loyalty can be bought. In Act IV, Catherine explains to Lord Loam how Crichton’s loyalty may well prove compromising for the family.

CATHERINE: (reveling the worst) But suppose Lady Brocklehurst were to get to him and pump him. She is the most terrifying, suspicious old creature in England; and Crichton simply can’t tell a lie. (60)

Quite the opposite do Crichton’s loyalties prove to be. His loyalty continues to serve the family even in the course of interrogations established by Lady Brocklehurst. He could have confessed what occurred on the island and exposed the “real” story for a few minutes or pages of fame and recognition, but remaining loyal to Lord, remaining loyal to his ideals, presents the ultimate fame and recognition to him.

When considering the family’s narcissistic point of view, alas, Crichton is merely remaining loyal to himself. He would not have sold-out the family name in order to prosper from a better deal somewhere else; perhaps someone would fancy a servant so resourceful. People are generally more willing to respect a person who remains loyal to an institution even if they disagree with it, or, at the least, keep their discrepancies private; Crichton understands this and parts gracefully when the time is right.

For a person who is admirable, Crichton is, it is natural for them to remain loyal. Remaining loyal is natural to Crichton. Self-pride and allegiance to ones ideals and values is what loyalty means to him in the play. He realizes the significance of individuals appreciating their adaptive and natural roles in society and continues to serve this theory to the end, until the time is right, then he parts. Loyal to the end.

Bibliography:

Posted in Uncategorized

Natural Rights And Herbert Croly

Natural Rights And Herbert Croly

Natural Rights And Herbert Croly

“They did it, no doubt, in the name of democracy; but of all perverted conceptions of democracy, one of the most perverted and dangerous is that which identifies it exclusively with a system of natural rights” (Croly 81). To Herbert Croly, in his book The Promise of American Life, God or nature cannot secure individual rights. The entire nation, as a whole, must work to make sure that all of the people have equal rights and equal opportunity.

The American people’s loyalty to the idea of democracy, as they understand it, cannot be questioned. But what it means to them is more of an idea of popular sovereignty. The will of the people determines what the government should or should not do. For Croly, democracy means much more than just popular sovereignty. Although “there can be no democracy where the people do not rule,” a “government by the people is not necessarily democratic” (Croly 179). While individual freedom is important, the whole of a nation must create the future; thus no one person can do it. For this to work there must be equal rights for all individuals.

“A community in which no man or no group of men are granted by law any advantage over their fellow-citizens is the type of the perfect and fruitful democratic state” (Croly 180). The majority of Americans would contend that this arrangement is perfectly fine. Individuals are free to pursue the interests that they want, and all individuals can enjoy any liberties that one person enjoys. Under this arrangement, there should be no room for permanent legal privileges for any class of citizens. Equality is then associated with individual rights, when in reality individual rights do not always mean equality in receiving such rights.

The natural rights philosophy clearly won’t work for Croly. God or nature does not give equal rights and equal opportunity to all. Although all are born with the same rights, not all people are born with ways to attain these rights. Equal rights do not mean equal resources. Americans who believe in the notion of an equal start are “wholly blind to the fact that under a legal system which holds private property sacred there may be equal rights, but there cannot possibly be any equal opportunities for exercising such rights” (Croly 181). Comparative material conditions dramatically affect opportunities. In the current system, a person who is born to privilege starts with an advantage over others born at the same time.

So then, how can a society be built with true equality if natural rights won’t do? Revere those that have truly made it on their own, and have lived the American dream. Those who have merely used the privileges they were born with to achieve the same goals should not be congratulated. Privileges do not translate into rights. Men who are “naturally disposed to be envious and suspicious of others more fortunate than themselves come to confuse their suspicions with a duty to society” (Croly 184). This confusion shifts the blame of American social development from the vagueness of America’s fundamental development, to different social groups. Those that have more money, or are better looking, or live in a different part of town are playing unfair. Instead a truly democratic society must rely on an underlying unity.

Democracy “cannot prevail unless the individuals composing it recognize mutual ties and responsibilities which lie deeper than any differences of interest and idea” (Croly 185). It is not God’s divine will that makes men equal. Men make men equal. Individuals must come together in a sort of brotherhood if they are to be truly free to pursue their destiny. Narrow-mindedness and selfishness must be transformed for genuine equality to exist. For equal rights and equal opportunity to coincide, individuals must be empowered to do their best. To do so would require some individual property rights to be given up to the nation. Only by doing this can private ambition and selfishness be changed into brotherhood. In Croly’s mind only liberty can overcome selfishness, and liberty and thus equality can only come from a nation united in itself. To create a true brotherhood of men, a new Declaration of Independence must be written.

The existing Declaration as is only says that rights are self-evident; it does not say that rights are self-attaining. “The idea of a constructive relation between American nationality and American democracy is in truth equivalent to a new Declaration of Independence. It affirms that the American people are free to organize their political, economic, and social life in the service of a comprehensive, lofty, and far-reaching democratic purpose” (Croly 278). If nothing is done to change the fabric of the United States citizen, then the “independence of spirit vanishes” (Croly 279). For the American people, this point may soon be approaching.

“They must either seize the chance of a better future, or else become a nation which is satisfied in spirit merely to repeat indefinitely the monotonous measures of its own past” (Croly 279). The national government is responsible for the social improvement of its people, but the people must stand united behind the government for it to work. Popular sovereignty is essential to the democratic process; people in themselves, however, are not sovereign so popular sovereignty must then mean “national sovereignty” (Croly 280). The people are sovereign “in so far as they are united in spirit and in purpose; and they are united in so far as they are loyal one to another, to their joint past, and to the Promise of their future” (Croly 280). For democracy to work, people must work together for this Promise and possibly give up pieces of their past or give up wishes for their future. Democracy is not simply the creation and exercising of rights; it has to be a collaborative effort of brotherhood for all people.

Natural rights are simply unchecked individualism and selfish attachments to private property. True and equal rights are not something that nature can give individuals. The belief that rights are given in such a way is destructive to the fabric of American democracy. If the public only believes that rights are given and can be associated with privilege, no one will work for true equality. Men must come together and strive to achieve their goals through helping each other; they must all meet their goals by starting on equal ground. When one individual makes it, he or she should be praised above all others and held up as an example of what true freedom can do. “The common citizen can become something of a saint and something of a hero, not by growing to heroic proportions in his own person, but by the sincere and enthusiastic limitations of heroes and saints, and whether or not he will ever come to such imitation will depend upon the ability of his exceptional fellow-countrymen to offer him acceptable examples of heroism and saintliness” (Croly 454).

Bibliography:

1.Croly, Herbert. The Promise of American Life. New Jersey: Transaction

Publishers, 1993.

Posted in Uncategorized

Nato-North Atlantic Treaty Organization

Nato-North Atlantic Treaty Organization

Nato-North Atlantic Treaty Organization

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization has been a silent partner on the world stage for more than half of the century and the most successful political-military alliance in history. The United Nations and their peacekeeping efforts have had the spotlight for the past few years. However the driving force behind any successful agreement or, if needed, action on the part of several countries has been because of the strong foundation and experience of NATO and its members. The following report will chronicle the events leading up to the creation of NATO, its first decade, the constant struggle with communism in the decades that proceed, and finally the challenges for NATO today and in the future.

In the years after World War II, a new threat encroached upon the leaders of Western Europe and their hopes of a stable peace. This threat would be from the growing dominance of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) in Eastern Europe. The USSR had an increasing appetite for the smaller countries to her west. These aggressive demands for territory and the placing of installations in taken countries fueled the fears of many that the USSR was marching toward a third world war. Britain and France, not wanting to make the mistake again of appeasing this new menace until it was too late, developed the Dunkirk Treaty in 1947. This treaty in essence pledged a common defense against any aggression. The USSR answered this by creating a European Communist organization called the Cominform and it rejected the European Recovery Program, which is commonly known as the Marshall Plan. The Marshall Plan, named for the US Secretary of State, was basically a financial bailout for the European nations. These nations were starving because of the slow and near stopping of the coal and agricultural industries after WWII. The US offered millions of dollars to all of Europe to aid in rebuilding for four reasons. First, Europe had been a great marketplace imports and exports for the US. Second, historically West Germany had been an industrial hub and needed to be brought back to tip-top shape to buffer the expanding USSR. Third, with its increasing mass the USSR was becoming a rival to the US. Lastly, without this aid Western Europe might look to the USSR for help, which would make life a lot tougher for American interests. The year of 1948 was pivotal for Europe. In February, the Communists in Prague staged a coup d’etat and the spring brought the beginning of the Cold War. Immediately after WWII, Germany was divided in to occupation zones by Britain, France, the US, and USSR. The capital of Germany at the time was Berlin, which happened to fall in the Soviet zone. The governing administration located in Berlin fell, because of the obvious reason of “too many cooks spoil the broth”. When this happened, the USSR demanded that Berlin become solely part of the Soviet zone, since its status as capital was ruined. The USSR enforced this ruling by blockading all land routes into and tried to force the other powers out of its respective sectors of Berlin. Eventually the Berlin Blockade was squelched by a military airlift that lasted the rest of the year. The city still remained divided and became known as East (Soviet controlled) and West Berlin. This transgression on the part of the USSR prompted negotiations between Western Europe, the US and Canada that resulted in the North Atlantic Treaty. The language of the North Atlantic Treaty originally consisted of its preamble and fourteen articles. The preamble states that members will promote common values and will “unite their efforts for a collective defense.” The key article of the North Atlantic Treaty is number five (it’s the one that inspired my title) it reads, “The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them…shall be considered an attack against them all.” Another interesting article is the last one, number fourteen, and it calls for the deposition of the official copies of the treaty to be kept in the US Archives. The US already was establishing itself as the dominant member of an organization that is supposed to be based on equal responsibility. After the ratification of this treaty the structure of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) began. The highest policy-making body in NATO is the North Atlantic Council, which met in Paris until 1967. The council composed of permanent delegates from all members was responsible for general policy, budgetary outlines, intergovernmental consultation and administrative actions. There are two main temporary committees that answer directly to the council. Those are the Secretariat, which handles non-military functions of the alliance (economic, scientific, cultural, and environmental issues), and the Military Committee or the Defense Planning Committee (DPC), which consists of the chiefs of staff of the various armed forces. They meet to discuss military policies, develop defense plans for their respective areas, determine the force requirements, and deploy and exercise the forces under their command. The forces directly below the DPC are the Allied Commands Europe (was first headed by Eisenhower), Atlantic, and Channel and the Regional Planning Group (for North America). To assist in carrying out their global roles, the council and the DPC have established committees to deal with emergencies and the new threat of nuclear power. They meet only in a dire situation. However, until the outbreak of the Korean War in 1950, NATO had no real military structure. The Korean War was at first perceived as part of a worldwide Communist offensive beginning in the divided Germany. This perspective lead to the NATO military force that was explained in the preceding paragraph. Within NATO’s first decade the main military and security forces have come from the US. Along with this the US was depended on for the revival of Europe’s economy and polity. The Korean War also brought an overall expansion of the organization. By 1955, Greece, Turkey, and the Federal Republic of Germany (West Germany) had entered as members. The only provisions for West Germany was not allowed to manufacture NBC (nuclear, biological, and chemical) weapons. With the rearmament of West Germany in progress, the USSR and her allies decided to created a treaty organization of their own. The Warsaw Pact, signed in 1955, combined to powers of Albania, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, East Germany, Hungary, Poland, Romania, and of course the USSR. The members of this communist alliance were under strict control of the soviets headquartered in Moscow. Key posts in these satellite countries were usually ran by soviet-born or soviet-trained officers and all their equipment was standardized to the regulations of the USSR. The structure of the Warsaw Treaty Organization (WTO) was similar to NATO. Two major bodies carried out the policies of the pact. The first was the Political Consultative Committee, which handled all activities except military, and the Unified Command of Pact Armed Forces, which had authority over the troops assigned to certain members. On paper you can see the similarities, but the USSR rule with absolute dominance. When members tried to break away or try to join NATO, the consequences were terrifying. In 1956, Hungary tried to withdrawal from the WTO; the USSR took unilateral military action against the revolt killing 200,000 people. Another member state, Czechoslovakia attempted to leave and was swiftly forced back by a soviet invasion. Albania seemed to find a way out, because of their alliance with China and some other ideological reasons, and broke off in 1968. With the USSR’s undeniable stranglehold on its neighboring countries in place, the race began for total superiority on the global scene over the US and her allies. The main gauge for this was nuclear weapon advances and stockpiles. Who could have the biggest and best in the shortest amount of time and who would dare to use it first? These pressing questions tainted the next three decades and worried some of the other NATO members that the US wouldn’t honor their pledge if the USSR were to do the unspeakable to Western Europe. NATO members tried to keep a positive perspective, but several events caused a sense of dissatisfaction of its worth by the end of the sixties. To begin the decade off the USSR officially blockaded their side of Berlin by erecting the ‘wall’. At first the Berlin Wall consisted only of barbed wire, but people were ‘escaping’ to East Germany, so an actual concrete wall was constructed with all the bells and whistles, like checkpoints with armed guards and minefields. The people of East Germany were prisoners in their own country and were not allowed to contact or visit family. In addition, the withdrawal of France, one of the founding members, in 1966 by President Charles de Gaulle sent shock waves through the organization. Although they continued to contribute to the alliance, they left the governing duties to the other members. Also NATO was pressured by the smaller nation-states to be come members and that would take a lot of funding, time, and focus away from the problems in Eastern Europe. One of the main factors of the late sixties and early seventies was America’s involvement in the Vietnam War. This horrifying war sapped the US economy, morale, and foreign policy prowess. Although the 1970s began with the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT I), this decade created more disillusionment by world powers as the Soviets continued to rapidly stock their military and nuclear arsenals. In 1979, NATO initiated a dual-track program where new defense efforts were coupled with new efforts in reconciliation and cooperation. Unfortunately, the steps taken by both sides were small and uneventful and usually were retracted within a short time. This brings us to the Reagan years, the eighties, and to the closest watched political tug-a-war in years. This decade opened with a deepening crisis and in 1983 the USSR failed to prevent the deployment of intermediate-range ballistic missiles, sent to counteract the ones they had pointed a Europe’s major cites. It is possible to say that NATO help greatly in dissuading the USSR from following through on attacking Western Europe. The ‘game’ had gotten deadly serious and in 1987 both sides agreed to talks. Out of these talks came the Intermediate-range Nuclear Force (INF) Treaty, which not only gave people a sense of relief across the world it also began the breakdown of the Warsaw Pact and the WTO. The change in the wind prompted the Berlin Wall that separated a people for over twenty-five years to be torn down and Germany was finally reunified. The late eighties to the mid-nineties finally saw the beginning of the end to the Cold War. This time also showed the world the success of NATO and the unified efforts of its members in meeting the challenge of the Communists and the WTO. NATO had finally shown itself to be a viable source for communication and resolution between factions instead of war. That became more evident in the 1990s, with the continued depletion of nuclear arsenals on both sides, the dissolving of the Warsaw Pact in 1991, and the continued duties to help return the countries of Eastern Europe to normalcy. An example of this is evident in Bosnia/Herzegovina and Kosovo. These areas and people have been able to strengthen their nationalistic feeling with both encouraging and disastrous results. Through the efforts of the UN and NATO forces a peaceful conclusion may be in the future for this troubled culture. The organization has already placed in the works the inclusion of the Czech Republic (formerly part of Czechoslovakia), Hungary, and Poland. These talks are setting the stage for NATO’s most significant expansion. These countries will need modern military training, upgrades on their communications, command, and air defense systems at an estimated cost of between $25 and $35 billion over thirteen years. The members of NATO pay out this money, the US share being approximately $200 million over ten years. There was a time that even the thought of these countries entering NATO peacefully was unheard of. These new members make NATO’s interests in the Balkans even more timely. Over the past few years, the establishment of a long-term stability in the Balkans has fallen on NATO’s already overweighed shoulders. The former Yugoslavia is one area of Europe where the end of the cold war has not brought about the general trend towards openness, democracy and integration that we have seen elsewhere. Ending this anomaly will mean looking beyond the time frame of NATO’s Stabilization Force in Bosnia. Once the parties realize that settling differences peacefully and democratically really is the only viable option, then Bosnia and other countries in the region will have the right to the fullest integration into the international community. In Kosovo, where the world community is facing humanitarian, political and legal dilemmas, a solution must be found that allows the Ethnic Albanians more autonomy within the confines of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. In finding such a solution, we must avoid a situation where moral considerations are pitted against international law. And we must remember that a security policy that doesn’t take as its point of reference the needs of humanity, risks suffering the worst possible fate- a slide into irrelevance. In Kosovo’s immediate neighborhood, NATO has helped to provide hope and some stability, as well as assistance in coping with the refugees in Albania and Macedonia. The latter country is hosting a NATO extraction force, ready to support the verification mission deployed in Kosovo. Hopefully, the prospect of long-term stability, coupled with the desire for economic benefits, will draw the entire Balkans back into the European mainstream. None of this will happen without NATO continued belief in “collective security”. To deal with these challenges, there is a need for further improvements in the inter-operability and sustainability of alliance forces. The future of NATO lies in having rapidly deployable capabilities to fulfill an increasing range of missions. The military forces of NATO allies will need to be on the same wavelength; able to move effectively and quickly, to communicate with one another- service to service, as well as ally to ally- in a world where information technologies are becoming part of the modern soldier’s basic kit. Trying to stay as current as possible on NATO’s movements is not an easy job these days. Every hour seems to bring a new page to NATO’s illustrious history. We can only sit back and watch the further developments in the Balkan region and in the other ‘hotspots’ around the world, like Korea, Rwanda, India, and even within the NATO members themselves. Other important issues approach on the horizon that will strongly effect NATO, the unification of Europe, China’s threats to security and the questions of a possible global peace in the millenium. Can NATO meet these challenges? Can it evolve in the shadow of the Cold War? The next few years will unfold an exciting chapter in the history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.

WORKS CITED Ergang Ph.D., R., Europe in Our Time (D.C. Heath and Co. 1958) Goldfield, D., Abbott, C., DeJohn Anderson, V., Argersinger, J. & P., Barney, Wm., and Weir, R., The American Journey: A History of the United States: vol. 2; chap. 29, pp. 890 and chap.33, pp. 1031-2 Guehenno, J., trans. by Elliot, V., The End of the Nation-State (UN of Minnesota 1995) Nelan, B., “A Popular Bad Idea”, Time, May 11, 1998 v151 n18 p38 Remington, R., The Warsaw Pact (The MIT Press 1971) Stanley, T., NATO in Transition: The Future of the Atlantic Alliance (Praeger Pub. 1965) Toland, J., The Last Hundred Days (Random House 1966) T. Caspody, A. Millar, , J. Matousek, “NATO’s shaky new triad: the alliance’s three prospective members haven’t made an informed public choice”, The Nation, March 16, 1998 v266 n10 p18(4) “NATO’s New Challenge: What is NATO Without a Cold War?”, Time International, Dec. 10, pg. 50+ “Open Doors: NATO reaches out to Europe’s other half”, Time International, Dec. 10, 1998 p55 Various information including referrals and title graphic attained at www.nato.com

Bibliography:

Bibliography

WORKS CITED Ergang Ph.D., R., Europe in Our Time (D.C. Heath and Co. 1958) Goldfield, D., Abbott, C., DeJohn Anderson, V., Argersinger, J. & P., Barney, Wm., and Weir, R., The American Journey: A History of the United States: vol. 2; chap. 29, pp. 890 and chap.33, pp. 1031-2 Guehenno, J., trans. by Elliot, V., The End of the Nation-State (UN of Minnesota 1995) Nelan, B., “A Popular Bad Idea”, Time, May 11, 1998 v151 n18 p38 Remington, R., The Warsaw Pact (The MIT Press 1971) Stanley, T., NATO in Transition: The Future of the Atlantic Alliance (Praeger Pub. 1965) Toland, J., The Last Hundred Days (Random House 1966) T. Caspody, A. Millar, , J. Matousek, “NATO’s shaky new triad: the alliance’s three prospective members haven’t made an informed public choice”, The Nation, March 16, 1998 v266 n10 p18(4) “NATO’s New Challenge: What is NATO Without a Cold War?”, Time International, Dec. 10, pg. 50+ “Open Doors: NATO reaches out to Europe’s other half”, Time International, Dec. 10, 1998 p55 Various information including referrals and title graphic attained at www.nato.com

Word Count: 2494

Posted in Uncategorized

Native Vs, Euros

Native Vs, Euros

Native Vs, Euros

Throughout history, the clash of contrasting cultures has never resulted in a positive conclusion, but rather racial segregation and the arrogant use of stereotypes in all aspects of life.

Long before the white man set foot on Canadian and Saskatchewan soil, the Indians, or rather the Native Canadians had been living in North America. When the Europeans came here, there were more than 10 million Indians populating North America and they had been living here for quite some time. It is believed that the first Native Americans arrived during the last ice age, approximately 20,000 – 30,000 years ago through a land bridge across the Bering Sound, from northeastern Siberia into Alaska.

So, when the Europeans started to arrive in the 16th- and 17th-century they were met by Native Americans, and enthusiastically so. The Natives regarded their white-complexioned visitors as something of a marvel. They enjoyed the white man’s clever technology and outlandish dress, such as steel knives and swords, guns and cannons, mirrors, hawksbills and earrings, copper and brass kettles, and so on.

However, conflicts eventually arose. As a starter, the arriving Europeans seemed attuned to another world. They appeared to be oblivious to the rhythms and spirit of nature. Nature to the Europeans, and the Indians detected this, was something of an obstacle, even an enemy. It was also an opportunity. A forest was so many board feet of timber, a beaver colony so many pelts, and a herd of buffalo so many robes and tongues. Even the Indians themselves were a resource, being souls ripe for the Christian plucking.

It was the Europeans’ cultural arrogance, combined with their materialistic view of the land and its animal and plant beings that the Indians found repellent. Europeans were regarded as mechanical, soulless creatures that wielded evil tools and weapons to accomplish mad ends. They believed that the Indian’s rightful land belonged to the Queen, and ignored the fact that the Natives had initially lived in North America for thousands of years before settlers even knew the continent existed.

The Europeans brought with them a desire and will to conquer the new continent for all its richness, and also diseases that hit the Indians hard. Conflicts developed between the Natives and the Invaders, with the Europeans arriving in overwhelming numbers. The Europeans were accustomed to own land and laid claim to it while they considered the Indians to be nomads with no interest to claim land ownership. The conflicts led to many battles and wars. In these wars the Indian tribes were at a great disadvantage because of their modest numbers, nomadic life, lack of advanced weapons, and unwillingness to cooperate, even in their own defense. The Indian’s were then herded into reserves and coerced into signing their land over through the use of unfair treaties.

The Europeans exploited this cultural helplessness. In exchange for items such as firs and beaver pelts to dress the upper-class of settling Europeans, the white people gave the Indian nomads small amounts of land to settle on, called reserves, and useless amounts of paper money that the Indians had no use for. A planned assimilation had already started, causing a growing strife between the white man and the natives. The outburst of society driven stereotyping and racism appeared in no time, and is still prominent in Canada and Saskatchewan.

As children, most of us were given a playground definition of racism. Racism meant assuming bad things about someone just because of the color of his/her skin, and it is the main ingredient in cultural disunity. Think about this: Its definition actually contains three separate components. First, a racist has “bad intent.” Second, a racist makes prejudiced assumptions. And third, a racist targets an unchangeable characteristic about a culture or race.

Let’s begin with the notion of race as an unchangeable characteristic. Race is in our genetic makeup. We did not choose our ancestors, and the Native’s did not choose theirs. The luck of the draw, the miracle of creation, determines a cultures racial heritage. The main part of any liberal culture is respect for these characteristics. We do not deserve to use either praise or slander towards them. No one earns their race, nor can they be blamed for it.

Unchangeable characteristics are only one part of human nature. An individual also has ethnicity, culture, religion, morals, political opinions, beliefs, feelings and traditions, for example. None of these parts of individual identity are directly tied to race. Not even ethnicity and culture are predetermined by race, much less other parts of our identity. For example, a Caucasian may be born in China, and grow up in Chinese culture. In fact, every individual, however influenced by ancestors, family traditions and expectations, is at least capable of creating an independent personal identity. Multiracial individuals are a perfect illustration of this. They do not have a multiracial ethnicity or culture, but rather a personal, individualistic approach to how race affects their identity. The settling Europeans certainly did not understand this; they saw their way of life as superior, and looked down upon the more “primitive” nomadic Indian tribes. Eventually, once established, the European’s developed a fear of the red-skinned Indian culture.

All of these other aspects of identity are changeable, not immutable. Of course, it may be far easier to change our political opinion than our religion, but certain aspects of our identity can be changed easily. Unlike race, they are not genetically determined.

Race is special because we do not choose it. It is the one value you can claim as your own. We can be held responsible, however, for what we do and believe, for how we dress and what we eat, for whom we love and how we love, and for how we worship God or Nature and how we deal out government. Race may be a sacred characteristic of individual identity, but what individuals do and believe is not protected from criticism. When the white man came to Canada for the first time, the natives looked at them with reverence, instead if arrogance and opportunity. On the other hand, the European’s saw the Indians as nothing but savages, ready to be steam-rolled culturally and religiously.

Since the Europeans landed, they (and we) have found it easy to criticize and insult how individuals from other cultures dance, sing, eat, dress and so on. We have the free will to decide what our own conception of ‘the good-life’ is. However, our culture is in no way free from cultural criticism. All cultural norms, from infanticide, spousal abuse and genital mutilation to arranged marriages, pow-wow’s, and eating with utensils, are not free from discussion. If we were to constantly question all of our cultural aspects, it would question our society’s stability.

Let’s look at another part of our definition of racism and why it creates problems between cultures: prima facie assumptions, or prejudice. Prejudice is necessary, but does not fit the full meaning of racism. Everyone is prejudiced, but not everyone is racist. The real racist is irrational, because he comes to conclusions about racial identity due to false assumptions or none at all. For example, someone may say: “All the Indian’s I know are drunks. Here is an Indian I do not know. He must be a drunk.” While this individual is using evidence, personal experience and reason to come to his conclusion, his logic is faulty.

“Bad intent” will show how prejudice is not necessarily racism. In point, the settling European’s were not necessarily racist people when they arrived here, but their intent was immoral from the start. They won the culture clash, and forced the Native culture to lose most of their own racial identity.

But what about those assumptions regarding racial identity that is made with “good intent?” For example, many individuals desire to protect their ethnicity and culture, which comes from their racial identity. To protect their culture, these individuals may decide to protect the purity of their race, as well. So, they push for individuals to marry and reproduce within their own racial kind. Of course, the Indians never even had a chance to do this; they were overwhelmed by the White Culture, and the true roots of their own were nearly lost altogether. Still today the natives struggle for independence, and still today roadblocks are thrown in front of them at every turn by Canada’s white dominated society.

In other words, the Europeans came to this continent with good intentions of their own, but because of the extreme difference between the Native Canadian’s culture and the European’s, the good intent turned to bad intent and led to the destruction of the less-powerful Indian culture, and inevitable racial segregation. These hasty conclusions about “bad” and “good” intent led to more misunderstandings between the two cultures.

How many parents of children do you know that are racially intolerant of the prominent Native population in Regina? Of those, look at how many of the children of those families grow up with the same bitterness and ignorance on the tip of their tongues. Heightened awareness of our diversity breeds heightened awareness of our sharpest oppositions. If improperly handled, diversity can destroy even our most basic sense of unity, and that is why the Europeans could not honour the Native Canadian culture. We no longer even despise their culture, or even try to assimilate them into ours. In order to survive among us, they have adopted our culture. Still, we sweep them under the rug and spit on them in the gutter at every chance; parallel to how the early European’s treated the Natives of early North America and Canada.

The two cultures should be united with one purpose. We should want more than emotional outbursts and intensely hurt feelings. We want an unprejudiced education available to both cultures. If we are to continue seeking an understanding of racism, stereotypes, and prejudices, and abolish the cultural divide, the meaning of these must be accessible to all, regardless of the color of one’s skin. If our early ancestral European settlers had adopted this view, then perhaps we would be living in a unified, unbiased society where both races co-exist as one human.

Bibliography:

Posted in Uncategorized

Native American Voices, The book of Genesis V.S. The Cherokee creation myth.

Native American Voices, The book of Genesis V.S. The Cherokee creation myth.

Native American Voices, The book of Genesis V.S. The Cherokee creation myth.

In the book of Genesis there was a God that created the earth and heaven. On the other hand, in the Cherokee creation myth in the beginning there is only water and a beetle accidentally created earth. In the Cherokee creation myth the animals created the mountains, valleys, etc. God created light (so he created the sun) so says the book of Genesis. In the creation myth of the Cherokees the conjurers put the sun seven-hand breaths above the earth. In the book of Genesis God created the flora and fauna and men, namely humans, Adam and Eve. In the Cherokee man came after the animals. There were a man and a woman. They procreated every seven days.

The fire is the cause of what the appearances of some animals are. In the Cherokee creation myth there is a lot about the appearances of the animals. In the creation myth the animals, tree, plants and humans talked to each other and were friends. However, when the people invented all sorts of weapons and tools, the relationship was endangered. The animals created diseases to punish the man. The plants and trees, which were still friends of the humans, created cures for the diseases.

The book of Genesis is more about how God created the Earth and the humans and how this all happened in seven days.

God is the almighty. He punishes the evil and rewards the good. He is the guardian, protector of the world.

In the Cherokee creation myth everything and everybody created the world; not one Supreme Being but all little things. The creation myth is more on the gradual changes or improvements on the earth. And also the man is not the center of interest in the creation myth. Trees, plants, beasts, fishes, birds, insects and people all play an equally divided role in the creation of the earth.

The Native Americans have had great riches in human and spiritual resources. Unfortunately, these riches are ignored and forgotten by the western civilization. However, even today many Indians, even among their young people, still find strength and meaning in their religious beliefs and ceremonies. The school curriculums omitted the riches of the ceremonies and religious beliefs. Risking to create people who lacked their roots and purpose in life and almost destroyed a unique heritage. During the early contacts between the Europeans and the Native Americans, the Europeans found the Indians either a brutal uncivilized savage or as a naive child. Because the Indians did not have any written language, we found it difficult to understand their depth of wisdom.

We also found it difficult to understand the nomadic life many Indians lead. We are obsessed with material achievements and we fail to see the human and spiritual values in life. The Indian tribes in the Great Plains have great beauty and dignity in their cultural forms. One of the symbols that expresses most completely the Plains Indian concept of the relationship between human beings and the world of nature surrounding them is a cross inscribed within a circle. At the center of the circle uniting within a point the four directions of the cross and all the other quaternaries of the universe, is a human person. One of the most precise ritual expressions of this centrality is found in one of the rites of the Avapaho Sun Dance. In this dance their sacred wheel is placed against each of the four sides of a man¡¯s body. Starting from the feet and moving to the head. Then it is turned sunwise four times, until finally it is turned over the head, with the four attached eagle feathers hanging down over the man¡¯s breast. So that he is ritually at the center, a vertical axis to the horizontal wheel. This concept of the vertical axis explains the sacredness of the number seven to the Indians, and it is interesting to note that their interpretation is identical to that found in other major religions. In adding the vertical dimensicus of sky, earth linking the two, with feet on the ground and the head, or intellect at the center of the firmament. The middle disc, like the vertical axis, represents humanity, for in joining sky and earth. This is neither pure spirit nor a gross matter, but a synthesis of both. This particular symbol may be found among the crew in the three things they often paint around the sacred cottonwood tree at the center of their circular Sun Dance lodge. It was further explained to me by an old Crow priest that these circles represent the three ¡®worlds¡¯ that constitute human beings: body, soul and spirit, or again: gross, subtle and pure. In most of the great religious people built centers of worship in the form of cathedrals, churches or temples. For the Indians however the world of nature itself was their temple, and within this sanctuary they showed respect to every form, function, and power. But what is unique in the Indians attitude is that their reverence for nature and for life is central to their religion: each form in the world around them bears such a host of precise values and meaning that taken all together they constitute their doctrine.

Only in being nothing may an individual human being become everything and only then realize the essential kinship with all forms of life. Because of humankind¡¯s centrality it has the almost divine function of guardian ships over the world of nature. Once this role is ignored or misused, people are in danger of being shown by nature who in reality is the conqueror and the conquered. From another perspective in the past humans had to protect themselves from nature, today nature must be protected from humans.

The Inipi, sweat lodge, are a preparation to other major rites. During the four periods of sweating prayers are recited, sacred songs are sung and a pipe is ceremonially smoked four times by the circle of people. At the end of the last period ¡®the door is opened¡¯ and the light enters the darkness. And the people are renewed beings that entered the world of light and wisdom.

The pipe represents the human being in his totality, or the universe of which humankind is a reflection. The bowl is the heart, or sacred center, and each section of the pipe is usually identified with some part of other human being. The pipe was smoked to establish a relationship or peace between friends or enemies. For in smoking the pipe together each person is helped in remembering his own center, which is now understood to be the same center of every person and of the Universe itself.

All true spiritual progress involves three stages, each stage should be realized and integrated into the next, so that ultimately they become one in the individual who attains the ultimate goal.

The three stages are purification, perfection/expansion and union. If we understand the Indian relationship with nature and the values of their symbols and rites, then we may become enriched and our understanding will deepen. The American Indian heritage will claim its rightful place among the great spiritual traditions of humankind.

Through the vision quest, participated in with physical sacrifice and the utmost humility the individual is opened in the most direct manner to contact with the spiritual essences underlying the forms of the manifested world. The greatest power in the retreat is contact with silence.

In several cultures the retreat is initiatory in character for young men or occasionally for young women, who seek spiritual sanction for a new and sacred name; in the arctic or among some south-western peoples this retreat is participated in city by those who seek the necessary spiritual power for becoming special religious practitioners, a shaman, a medicine man or a singer. Among many groups the retreat was specifically associated with the quest for a guardian spirit, although this is not as general a phenomenon as the vision itself among the plains people the vision quest was most intensely developed; it was an activity that was expected of every young man and woman. It was believed that no one in these societies could have success in any of the activities of the culture without the unique spiritual power received through the quest.

The minimal formal elements of the retreat involved the guidance of a spiritual mentor, preliminary rites of purification, the seeking cut of an isolated place and the observance of a total fast.

Essentially, the person was to be exposed, normally four days and four nights, to the elements to the forms and forms and forces of nature, the person should be attentive to whatever might appear no matter how insignificant the being or phenomenon might seem to be.

Not all that sought for a vision received the experience. When the experience did come it was in the form of some being, a bird or an animal or of the powers and phonema of the natural world.

Frequently the animal or bird might become the individual¡¯s guardian spirit, which would protect him or her in the events of life.

In the American Indian cultures the vision experience served in an especially forceful manner to render transparent to the individual some facet of the phenomenal world, revealing aspects of a spiritual world of greater reality underlying this world of appearances. The beings, or whatever might be involved in the vision, serve as intermediaries revealing aspects of reality through which the ultimate reality of the great Mysterious (Wahan-Tanha) may be contemplated, if not comprehended.

For the first time in eighty years the Indians got the attention from the government. Ronald Reagan¡¯s ¡®Indian policy¡¯ was not a very good one, he tried assimilate the Indians.

Ross O. Summer said that retaining the culture and language might be desirable, but not at the cost of keeping the Indians poor dependent or unproductive. Some Indians tried something new and they surprised everybody by taking over the ¡°modern western capitalistic get rich scheme¡±. They started Indian gambling. In 1979 the Seminole of south Florida opened the first bingo hall. When state officials padlocked the building, the courts ordered it legal and open. Buildings as big as airplane hangers and jammed parking lots began appearing on Indian reservation. By 1987 almost fifty tribes were running bingo parlors, bringing in more then 250 million dollars annually. Even the Republicans had to admire such financial spirit.

The courts smiled upon Indian capitalism, but not on Indian spirituality. The American Indian Freedom of religion act of 1978 vowed to protect Indian use of protected wild animals whose feathers or skins were featured in rituals, for ceremonial use of peyote, and for Indian sacred lands that were used for religious pilgrimages, burials, or vision questing. Supreme Court Justice Sarah O¡¯conner said in 1988: ¡¯Even if we assume the road will virtually destroy the Indians ¡®ability to practice their religion, the constitution simply does not provide a principle that could justify upholding the Indians legal claims.’ Dissenting Justice William J. Brennan finds this reduces the Indian freedom to nothing more than the right to believe that their religion will be destroyed. After having been forced to do other people¡¯s will, the Indians finally thought to become their own boss.

Yet somehow while issues seemed to pop up all over the reservation. The senate who had given them this so-called privilege wound up hearing slogans like ¡°these hearings are making all of us look corrupt¡±.

Facing the year 2000, the native Americans fear they will eventually have to choose between cultural and physical survival or put differently tribal loyalty and the need to assimilate. An Indian spiritual leader states: ¡±If the United States continues on its present course, it will destroy both Indian and non-Indian people¡±.

The selections in this last chapter, ask whether the future of the first American will be a matter of personal choice, political agreements or a destiny guided by their own native spirits.

Richard S. Cardinal is torn away from his family and placed in a foster home. There, his stay is a terrible experience and he also does not experience very pleasant things neither with that family he lives with nor at school. He tries to commit suicide a couple of times before he succeeds.

The writer¡¯s life on the reservation was all very pleasant until the government found that modernization was needed. The Indians agreed however they regretted this afterwards.

Tayo¡¯s mother is a navajo-Indian and his father is a Mexican. His mother left with his aunt, Thelma, and his uncle, Robert.

When he was four years old his mother left him and never came back. His aunt was ashamed of him because he is a half-blood, but she understands Tayo. Rocky, Thelma¡¯s son accepts him as a brother and treats him like a brother. Josiah also accepted him as part of the family so does his grandmother. Later on he learns his mother had passed away. Ever since he was young he had an enemy, namely Emo, who hates Tayo because he is a half-blood.

When Rocky and Tayo joined the army, Rocky called Tayo brother for the first time. Thelma had always opposed them being brothers, because she was ashamed of Tayo. She excluded him from every family occasion.

¡×Rocky >> is important because Tayo returned home after the war, Rocky did not, he promised he would bring him back. Rocky was his best friends and Thelma¡¯s favorite. He blamed himself for Rocky¡¯s death.

¡×Josiah >> treated Tayo like a son. Does the ranch work with him. Tayo also blamed himself for Josiah¡¯s death.

¡×Thelma >> made Tayo feel different and guilty because he is a half-blood. She excluded him from every activity. She does not like him, but tried to get along with him.

Tayo¡¯s sickness began when Rocky died. He blames himself for his death. He has nightmares in which he sees Rocky and Josiah die. Tayo cried a lot and had to vomit occasionally.

The white doctors think it has to do with post-war trauma and it will pass eventually. The medicine men thinks that Tayo must accept himself, then the disease will be cured. Tayo should not blame himself for everything like the white men. The white doctors and the medicine men do not agree with each other.

The white men do not understand why the Indians want to stay in a dirty town that belongs to them. But the Indians were driven away from the location where the town is built, because it is their ground that of the white men. White men are the witches that were sent for by the Indians.

There is a draught that showed up when Tayo did something he was not supposed to, as in the poem. It could only be driven away if a certain goal was achieved. Tayo as well as the figure in the poem achieved their goal and the rain returns.

Ts’eh Montana makes him cry out for love for her. Out misery from the war she teaches him Indian ways of life and their medicine.

The evil is that we cannot accept and/or tolerate each other for who or what we really are. And that is why we will do everything to humiliate the person we despise. The be-littling gets worse, because the evil one gets followers.

Emo is gone, he cannot remind Tayo that he is a half-blood, Emo killed someone and is on the run. Harley and Leroy cannot get him drunk, Ts’eh Montana cured him.

Thelma finally accepts him. Ts’eh Montana also cured him from the nightmares and vomiting.

The novel is quite interesting, however it is sometimes very difficult to understand parts of the story line. The flashbacks were confusing and sometimes it is difficult to know which of the characters are the focalisators, because he does not use the characters’ name. The different stories in the novel were unclear to me at times. But as I said, it was an interesting novel but not really enjoyable.

Green Grass, Running Water by Thomas king.

1.I believe the ¡°I-figure¡± is doing this to explain the novel especially the creation myth (the old Indians). It is difficult for the readers to understand the creation myth, the ¡°I-figure¡± tells the creation myths to Coyote, but in fact he is explaining it to the readers.

2.The four old Indians escaped from a psychiatric clinic during their escape they are telling the creation myth to each other.

The four Indians are:1) First Woman = Lone Ranger

Object ¡æ marry Alberta, find a goal in life

End ¡æ he does not have a relationship with Alberta. But found a purpose, rebuild the cabin.

Object ¡æwants a baby, however no husband

Stimulus ¡æ she wants to be an independent woman, she is a feminist

End ¡æshe is pregnant without a husband

Object ¡æ to please the Indian and the ¡°white world¡±

Stimulus ¡æ he has connections (roots) in both ¡°worlds¡±

End ¡æ He decides to be more related, involved in the Indian world and to leave the ¡°white world¡±

Stimulus ¡æ explain the Indian culture to the tourists

Adversary ¡æ the tourists who do not agree with the dog meat

Object ¡æ she wants to preserve the Indian culture and she wants her children to be Indian

Stimulus ¡æ he does not understand it fully yet.

Helpers ¡æ ¡±I-figure¡±, Old Indians

Roles and responsibilities of the extended family

Norma feels responsible for her family, she wants them to remain Indians.

The ¡°I-figure¡± and the Old Indians try to tell the creation myth to Coyote (and to the readers)

Attitudes towards the surrounding white world.

There are some people who live in the Indian reservation and some live in the white world. The Indians preserve their own culture and try to keep it alive. The white world thinks their western modem civilization is supreme.

In the last part of the novel, they ridicule the Christian story of the Holy Virgin Maria. Her story is similar to Alberta¡¯s one in the end Coyote made Alberta pregnant.

Excerpt from “Green Grass, Running Water” page 456

¡°But I was helpful, too,¡± says Coyote. ¡°That woman who wanted a baby. Now, that was helpful.¡±

¡°Helpful!¡± said Robinson Crusoe. ¡°You remember the last time you did that?¡±

“GOD throws Eve and Ahdamn out of the Garden of Eden.”

This piece ridicules the strict and sometimes-unlogical Christian rules.

The book was really funny to read. It is a satire on the Christian belief.

Sometimes it was a bit confusing with the many characters in the novel. But later on, these characters were fully introduced and it became clear. The book also tells us a lot about the Indian culture and the creation myths, the way it was told was very clear, sometimes these myths are very complex to difficult grasp for the lay man. The author uses humor and modern aspects to clarify the myths. The mockery of the Christian belief did not strike me as disrespectfulness, because western world (especially Hollywood) created an unrealistic and hostile image of the Indian culture now the roles have changed. I think this novel is very appropriate for this course, it is much more readable and enjoyable than Ceremony by Leslie Marmon Silko. It reveals many aspects of the Indian culture.

1.A) Ray Levoi: he is almost ashamed because he is a half Indian later on he accepts his heritage. He becomes more related and involved with the Indian culture. He wants to find out the truth.

B) Frank Coutelle: everything must be done his way, he does not respect the Indians and their culture. He represents the American government that wants to swindle the Indians.

C) Jimmy looks Twice: ARM-activist, murder suspect of Leo Fast Elk. Enemy of the United States.

D) Jack Milton: a corrupt tribal council leader, he is an enemy of ARM. He is in cahoots with Frank Coutelle.

E) Richard Yellow Hawk: a supposedly invalid, he is being used by the FBI (Frank Coutelle). He is the real killer of Leo Fast Elk.

F) Maggie Eagle Bear: is a schoolteacher in the reservation also ARM-activist, she dislikes the FBI except Ray Levoi. She wants to find out who killed Leo Fast Elk, unfortunately she is murdered in the process.

2.Traditionalists ¡æ the conservative Indians who cling on their language culture and want to live in peace without while involvement; Federal government.

Progressives ¡æ the ‘lackeys’ of the U.S. government, they do their bidding and Betray their own people. Mainly they think of themselves and the amount money they can make.

3.He has sympathy for Ray Levoi, because with the help of Crow Horse Ray realizes his roots. Crow helps him to develop his identity.

4.Crow Horse envies Ray, because he has a vision. Ray is a half-blood and has a vision. Crow Horse a full-blood does not have a vision. One has to be proud of his/her Indian heritage and who you are and of your culture and background.

5.Yes, the medicine man is a curer, a wise man. He is a respected member in the Indian community. He has great knowledge about herbal medicine and the Indian history.

The medicine man is also a spiritual lead, guide of the Indians. So the image the film projected was more or less similar to mine.

6.No, nothing was unclear in the film to me. I understood the plot the setting etc. there were no complications. It was a nice, exciting film.

Bibliography:

Posted in Uncategorized

Narcolepsy. Sleep is an essential part of our lives

Narcolepsy. Sleep is an essential part of our lives

Narcolepsy

Sleep is an essential part of our lives. Those who do appreciate and enjoy sleep often take it for granted. Those who cannot sleep yearn for it, but realize that they will never appreciate its full capacity. Sleep is a part of the human life that also has disorders that terrorize its victims. One such sleep disorder is narcolepsy, this disorder is a bit different from most disorders that disallow sleep, and with narcolepsy you have no control of your sleep. Narcoleptics fall victim to a genetic disorder that makes it almost impossible to control the moments when you fall asleep. They live with knowing that at any time they are susceptible to an uncontrollable and personally embarrassing spell of sudden slumber. My research is aimed at identifying exactly what narcolepsy is, why it works and the certain available treatments of this disorder. The more we understand this disorder, the more equipped we are to deal with it in our lives as psychologists. The symptoms and qualifications for being a narcoleptic will be a large focus of this research only because I feel it important that we understand what qualifies someone as narcoleptic. It is often a misconception of the practitioner that the narcoleptic patient is a schizophrenic, perhaps with the information provided we will be able to avoid these misconceptions in the future.

If there is one part of the life process that we as humans have a less than average understanding of, it is the mystery of sleep. Many of us take for granted the fact that sleep is a complex process that rejuvenates and restores our minds and our bodies. However, like every aspect of the life process, sleep does not present itself to be error free. Sleep comes with a long list of disorders and problems that can affect anyone at any point in their life. Some disorders are genetic and others are developmental but they are all equally horrifying for the victim. One of the more interesting disorders is a genetic neurological disorder called narcolepsy. Narcolepsy is unique and fascinating to the psychological mind, but to the victim it is torturous. It is a disorder that brings with it much embarrassment and stress to the sufferer. Narcoleptics can take comfort however, knowing that although there is no cure for narcolepsy there are a number of successful treatments available. As this research unfolds, narcolepsy will be explained in detail as well as some of its history and treatments. Perhaps by becoming familiar and aware of it, we can better deal with and treat its patients.

Narcolepsy is a genetically based sleep disorder that deals with the mechanisms controlling sleep and waking. Narcolepsy is characterized by sudden extreme spells of sleepiness. This sleepiness is present in even the most well rested narcoleptic. However, this feature alone does not determine or delegate that a patient has narcolepsy. Aside from this sudden sleepiness, the victim must also report cataplexy, sleep paralysis and hypnogogic hallucinations. In order to be considered truly narcoleptic, all of these elements must be present in the individual (Pressman & Orr, 1997). Cataplexy is a sudden loss of muscle control, this loss usually happens while the patient sleeps, however narcoleptics experience this while awake. The cataplexy is as mild as falling to the ground briefly, to not being able to move at all. Hypnogogic and hypnopompic hallucinations are the second determinate of narcolepsy. These hallucinations are usually vivid visual or auditory hallucinations, experienced right after or before REM sleep. The narcoleptic will report seeing these images prematurely before REM sets in, or after the patient is awake the hallucination will not stop. Since these hallucinations are so real, often the patient mistakes them for something else and becomes very frightened. The third and final symptom of narcolepsy is called sleep paralysis. This occurs when the patient is waking up from REM sleep, and the normal muscle inhibition fails to end with the end of the REM stage. This leaves the patient awake but unable to move. All three of these symptoms must be present to diagnose a person with narcolepsy. It should also be kept in mind that on the same token, if an individual does possess all three symptoms of narcolepsy, that does not always meant that they are a narcoleptic. Presence of one symptom out of the possible three, will most often be treated as a singular problem not related to narcolepsy (1997).

Hypnogogic and hypnopompic hallucinations are a very interesting aspect of the narcoleptic. Aside from the previous definition and explanation of these images, it is necessity that we have a more in depth look at exactly what these hallucinations are. Hypnogogic hallucinations are nothing more than deeply vivid hallucinations that are associated with the onset of REM sleep. Narcoleptics fail to progress through the preceding stages of sleep before reaching REM sleep. This causes the narcoleptic to have these hallucinations right as wakefulness ends, leading to a string of consciousness from the real world right into the dream world (Dement & Vaughan, 1999). The difference in hallucinations is that for the narcoleptic patient these hallucinations are very terrifying and real. In fact, these hallucinations can be so real, that many narcoleptics have reported being completely awake and paralyzed. These hallucinations include such images as animal attacks, strange intruders in the home and some have even reported alien visitation. The most frightening part of these hallucinations is that the patient seems unable to distinguish from hallucination and reality (1999).

These hallucinations lead right into the second symptom of narcolepsy and that symptom is sleep paralysis. Narcoleptics have reported that while having these hallucinations, a type of temporary paralysis sweeps over them. They are unable to speak, move or even roll over (Fritz, 1993). Another part of narcolepsy that is linked to the hallucinations and paralysis is the presence of automatic behaviors. Soon after the sleep paralysis has passed, narcoleptics will often engage in simple everyday tasks such as making the bed. The task is completed but the narcoleptic has no recollection of the event ever happening. This is called an automatic behavior, and this is a problem for the narcoleptic who has images of intruders in the home or alien visitation. These automatic behaviors leave the victim to wonder if the hallucination was actually real. Some narcoleptics question the fact that if they did not do the task than surely the intruder must have completed it in order to not arouse suspicion, others believe that they are insane (1993).

Now that we know about the symptoms of narcolepsy, it is important that we further define the disorder itself and explore the roots of narcolepsy. As stated earlier narcolepsy is the dysfunction of the normal sleep mechanisms in the body. Victims are plagued by uncontrollable sleepiness throughout their day, no matter how much sleep they may have gotten on the previous night. Attacks can occur as a result of mood swings, for example a sudden burst of excitement may cause a victim to slip into a narcoleptic episode. A narcoleptic having an episode will lose all muscle function and appear to be asleep for a period of time, they usually are not easily waken and if they are awaken they are very frightened and remain paralyzed for several minutes. These episodes last between ten to twenty minutes, and they leave the patient feeling refreshed and rested. This however is a false sense of rest, sure enough an hour later the patient is once again consumed by overwhelming sleepiness (Hale, 1981).

What causes such dysfunction in a human, this question is asked over and over again with no definite answer. When narcolepsy was first being studied, many physicians and psychologist simply dismissed narcolepsy as schizophrenia, but since then research has been compiled to lead us away from this misdiagnosis. Evidence now points us to genetics and neurological explanation. In recent studies it has been found that in 99 of 100 narcoleptics, there is a shared genetic marker that is present in the blood of the victims. It is an exclusive genetic marker called DR2. DR2 is a leukocyte antigen, and while it may have a hand in other sleep disorders, it is most specific in narcolepsy (Lavie,

1996). others feel that narcolepsy is result of a biochemical imbalance of the CNS. Researches have begun to look more carefully at the at the presence of the

Neurotransmitter called acetylcholine, a chemical that plays a role in REM sleep. Blood flow in the brain has also been heavily studied as a result of the DR2 theory. After research was done on blood flow and narcolepsy, scientists have in large dismissed the DR2 theory and are focusing more on the brain stem and the increased blood flow through the brain stem that narcoleptics have been found to have (1996).

Due to the genetic nature of narcolepsy there is no cure, but treatments are available and usually successful. In order to treat narcolepsy, the patient must first complete a sleep study, this ensures a proper and accurate diagnosis of the patient. The most common treatment of narcolepsy is the use of antidepressants and stimulants. The stimulant battle the daytime sleepiness while the bulk of the work is done by antidepressants. Antidepressants are used to block the REM paralysis which leads to cataplexy (Dement & Vaughan 1999). In the past amphetamines were widely used to treat narcoleptics, but in the past few years as a result of the drug war and the information that researchers have collected about drug abuse, the use of such drugs has dwindled. The best treatment plan lies in the hands of the individual. They must set their own goals and be willing to achieve them. They must tell the practitioner what they wish to accomplish and the practitioner will draw up a plan to help treat them. They will also provide the necessary pharmaceuticals as well as moral support and help (Hales, 1981).

The knowledge that we have is amazing, but the knowledge that we do not have must be even greater. The more we search for understanding and the right answers, the closer we are to finding them for ourselves. Sleep is a huge mystery that we will only understand better as time goes on and people apply their knowledge. We do not have a cure for narcolepsy but with the proper time and the proper minds we one day could stumble upon it. Until that day, we can only try to understand the mystery of sleep and its many hidden secrets.

Bibliography:

Reference List

Dement, W. C., & Vaughan, C. (1999). The Promise of Sleep. New York, NY: Random House.

Fritz, R. (1993). Sleep Disorders: America’s Hidden Nightmare. Naperville, IL: National Sleep Alert.

Hales, D. (1981). The Complete Book of Sleep: How Your Nights Affect Your Days. London: Addison Wesley.

Lavie, P. (1996). The Enchanted World of Sleep. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Pressman, M. R., & Orr, W. C. (Eds). (1997). Understanding Sleep: The Evaluation and Treatment of Sleep Disorders. Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association.

Posted in Uncategorized

Napster and the music industry

Napster and the music industry

Napster and the Music Industry

“People are copying music because they feel somewhat disenfranchised with the options they have at their disposal in the digital space. It’s up to the content industry to create value in the digital arena and they’ve made phenomenal steps in that direction.”

Talal Shamoon, a key technologist for the SDMI (Secure Digital Music Initiative) Salon, 31 Jul 2000-08-01

District judge Marilyn Hall Patel ruled in favour of the Recording Industry Association of America (http://www.riaa.com/) (RIAA) regarding the Napster copyright case, based on the sheer size of the infringement that was taking place. Judge Patel directed that Napster should stop its song-swap activities and refused a motion that would delay the injunction until after an appeal had been presented. Napster intends to appeal against the decision. Related article: ‘Napster legal scrap could backfire on record industry.

CONSUMERS BUY MORE MUSIC PRODUCTS AFTER ‘TESTING’

A PC Data Online (http://www.pcdataonline.com) survey reports that only 16% of respondents supported the RIAA’s claim that Napster was in breach of intellectual property regulations and should be shut down. 57% agreed that it was unrealistic to control the free exchange of music. Many users said that they would not be dissuaded from downloading music even if it was deemed illegal. Almost 60% claimed that using Napster helped them in their music buying and 83% liked the ability afforded by the technology to test songs before purchasing CDs or cassettes.

Source: PC Data Online News Release, 27 July 2000

CONTROL OF MUSIC DOWNLOADING BEYOND INDUSTRY CONTROL

Despite all the media attention given to the Napster case, the Gartner Group (http://gartner11.gartnerweb.com/) believes that music downloading via the Net will prevail. Gartner suggests that it would have been more strategic for the RIAA to find a compromise with Napster, claiming that it will be far more troublesome for the RIAA to control other like technologies. Napster’s closure will mean that the RIAA’s task of controlling the industry will be impossible if it tries to chase every individual who has downloaded music illegally, possibly on someone else’s equipment.

Source: Gartner Group Press Release, 28 July 2000

The Napster case is not expected to affect the changing face of the music industry. Already other companies such as Freenet and Gnutella are providing consumers with similar music downloading technologies – the difference being that there is no central server and therefore no company or person to prosecute. If Napster disappears it will only serve to fuel an alternative industry creating millions of users impossible to locate and prosecute. A Jupiter/Media report indicated that during March this year, 80% of people with Napster software used it to download music compared with 40% of RealPlayer and Media Player users.

Source: Salon Technology, 27 July 2000

GNUTELLA, FREENET FILL THE NAPSTER GAP

The Napster result may be viewed by millions of users as a ‘call to arms’, fueling a greater consumer commitment regarding the continued free distribution of music. Following the Napster ruling Gnutella was overloaded with Net users downloading its free song trade program and Freenet experienced a doubling of ‘peer-to-peer’ traffic. Gnutella and Freenet link users rather that offer a centralized Web site like that of Napster. Gnutella considers itself to be a movement not a business. The creators do not have control over how people use the site. Freeness contests the assumption that information is property. The RIAA argues that Judge Pattel’s decision sends a message to music entrepreneurs that the commercialization of their sites is not an option.

Source: New York Times, 28 July 2000

Scheduled to be shut down on July 29, Napster has won a last minute reprieve in the appeals court. Napster is expected to argue that users have the legal right to share their own music and that a company cannot held responsible for such actions. Similar file sharing businesses are likely to face legal challenges. Several companies are working on finding Internet business models that serve to both protect copyright and partner content owners in online distribution. These models seek to find a bridge between completely free music and music that is completely paid for. Advertising may play a part in these models.

DOES THE NAPSTER RULING MAKE THE NET ILLEGAL?

Judge Patel’s Napster ruling is based on the view that a clear violation of copyright infringement law occurred through the provision of a system that enabled piracy. Her ruling may make all Internet file swapping and peer-to-peer communication activities vulnerable to charges of illegality. One observer claims that Napster has undertaken a pioneering function for the recording industry and suggests that the RIAA would be best advised to purchase Napster as a way of taking control of the online music sharing industry. The courtroom defeat of a financially exhausted company does not mean the end of the technological threat. The RIAA will need to find other ways to address changing realities.

Independent music companies association Impala has called on the EU to impose stringent conditions on proposed entertainment and Internet company mergers, in order to protect the viability of independent production and distribution of music. Impala is concerned that domination by a number of giant players could lead to predatory pricing strategies and the dictating of online music distribution, which could see the market value of music undermined. The EU is currently reviewing both the Time Warner/AOL and the Time Warner/EMI music business mergers. The EU must decide to what extent online music represents a new market sector separate from that of CDs and videos sold from conventional outlets.

Source: Financial Times, 13 July 2000

FIND PROTECTION IN THE TECHNOLOGY, NOT THE LAW

Although recent courtroom battles have found in favour of the ‘Old Media’, experts consider that it is unlikely that 20th century media laws will continue to define how information is transferred in the new century. Meg Smith of the Harvard Law School considers that it is too difficult to enforce copyright on media that consumers can possess. Jane C. Ginsburg, Professor at the Columbia Law School considers that recent cases in which the Old Media copyright laws were successfully applied to New Technology were clear cases of copyright breach. She considers that it will be more difficult to apply current law in future cases. Cyberlaw expert Jonathon Zittrain argues that technology currently supports the free distribution of information on the Net and content creators will need to look to technology for protection answers and not the law.

Source: Wall Street Journal, 28 July 2000

CAN THE MOVIE INDUSTRY AVOID ITS OWN NAPSTER?

The development of Div;-) and DeCSS are pushing the motion picture industry headfirst into the same copyright tussle as the music sector is facing. DeCSS decodes the content Scrambling System that underpins DVDs, enabling them to be shown on computers. Div;-) combines MPEG-4 and MP3 to compress video files to facilitate their downloading onto a computer prior to being copied onto CD-Rom. Forrester Research considers that DivX;-) is yet to hit critical mass as most consumers do not possess the necessary bandwidth. Forrester warns that the industry must produce a plan quickly to cover the legitimate transfer of its product over the Net. The Gartner Group points out that a number of movie companies are moving quickly to become involved in Internet movie applications and digital downloading will be common by the close of 2001.

INTERNET MUSIC FREEDOM FIGHTERS FORGE NEW DEALS

Pop music group Beastie Boys has negotiated a new recording deal handing them the rights to the release of their music through the Web. Other bands are seeking similar deals, releasing albums in MP3-only formats and searching for a variety of ways to enforce their perceived digital rights. Jupiter Communications considers that the traditional music industry’s ways of operation have lost their relevance. The record industry and some MP3 executives predict that the cost of encryption and other specifically online-related costs will erode the cost savings consumers and industry supporters are hoping for.

Beuc, a European based consumers group, fears that mergers between Net and entertainment companies will lead to a few powerful enterprises having a stranglehold on the music industry. Beuc considers that customers’ choices and privacy will be under threat. Music prices may also rise as large companies gain the power to control competitors and artists. Consumer privacy would also be threatened by the diverse range of information on individual shopping habits that one company would be able to access. The group has approached the EU in regard to their concern over the emerging links between large music enterprises.

Source: Financial Times, 27 July 2000

Bibliography:

This paper gives a critical coverage of how work teams, group behavior and managing organizational behavior relate to each ot

This paper gives a critical coverage of how work teams, group behavior and managing organizational behavior relate to each ot

Name

Lecturer

Course

Date

Interdependence

This paper gives a critical coverage of how work teams, group behavior and managing organizational behavior relate to each other within an organization. Any formal organization involves different types of workers who are categorized into various departments depending on their education, profession and level of experience. Such a bureaucratic stature gives room for hierarchical order in which the senior most workers in each department are given a mandate to head their junior counterparts. This kind of interaction can help in managing workers as cooperative teams. At the same time, it can help to influence the behavior of the work force. Therefore, it is important for such an organization to come up with measures to coherently manage their behaviors.

The coming together of different people within an organization to work as a team can greatly influence their behavior. This may be due the kind of formal and informal interactions which they may have in the course of their duty. Similarly it may result from the formation of unions in which one can learn to adopt the character traits of the others. Therefore, it is upon the top management to come up wit appropriate strategies to manage these behaviors. It should ensure that all sorts of employees are accommodated without any form of discrimination (Poile, C., 2010).

Being a team player is paramount in the success of any organization. There is no organization which can develop if its stakeholders are autonomously operating independent of one another. It is a very significant phenomenon which determines the success of an organization. Naturally, man is a social animal. Hence, it is incumbent upon the management and individual employees to learn how they can cooperate together and promote the spirit of interpersonal dependence. This implies that these concepts are directly dependent on each other. The concept of interdependence is very important in the promotion of unity. If workers can learn to work in a cooperative manner, they can be in a harmonious environment which will help them to do their jobs well. If this happens, none of them will be acting without considering the interest of others. As a result, there will be understanding which will help the organization to improve the quality of services (Poile, C., 2010). Otherwise, individuals operating in seclusion in a totally independent way will not recognize the presence and contributions of others. As a result, it will be very hard for them to know if they are going astray. This is because they have nobody to guide them.

The management should always strive to promote team play within the organization. The understanding of the concept of interdependence can help the management to understand how the diverse departments within their association rely on the performance of others. Pooled interdependence is the poorest since, in this type, each organizational department or business unit performs entirely separate functions. Departments do not interrelate and do not openly rely on each other. That means that failure of one department could lead to the failure of the whole process. Chronological interdependence happens when one entity in the total course creates an output essential for the performance by the next department. Demand for coordination is greater than in pooled interdependence. Reciprocal interdependence is alike to chronological interdependence in that the yield of one sector becomes the resource of another, with the count of being recurring (Poile, 2010).

Focused group behavior and team play can lead to high productivity in organizations especially if workers are behaving well. In managing organizational behavior, interdependence gives an upper hand as it is much easier when individuals are reliant and mutual to each other than when everyone works on their own (Poile, 2010). If people work in unity, it will be easier for them to carry out periodical assessments to evaluate the extent to which the objectives of the organization have been accomplished. Being a team player should be encouraged at all times because it brings tolerance within the organization. If all the stakeholders in an organization can speak with one voice, it will be certain that they can achieve a lot. In this case, everyone will be working for the sake of promoting the growth and success of the organization.

Conclusively, the paper would like to agree with the fact that interpersonal dependence is a paramount concept of management. There is evidently a very big relationship between work teams, group behavior and managing organizational behavior. Each of these is directly dependent on each other and can assist in uniting all the stakeholders to speak with one voice at all times. This will give the organization a good image to the public as it expands its operations.

Works Cited

Poile, C. (2010) Asymmetric Dependence and Its Effect on Helping Behavior in Work Groups. Waterloo, Ont.: University of Waterloo.

Posted in Uncategorized

Throughout history, there have been many attempts to explain the origin and workings of our universe.

Throughout history, there have been many attempts to explain the origin and workings of our universe.

Mythology

Throughout history, there have been many attempts to explain the origin and workings of our universe. Most every culture has its own cosmogony. Nearly every individual has his or her own idea of what our universe is. During our modern era of advanced scientific knowledge, we feel that we have a good grasp on how the universe works. We have our Chemistry and Physics, along with Mathematics, to examine the universe with. Any person educated in these fields will tell you that they know our universe. The point is science in the modern era is thought to be the correct summation of the universe. We think we are right. Does this make everyone else wrong?

Those who believe in myth over science, are they wrong? These are some of the questions that I will be discussing in this essay. I will examine the evolution of cosmological thought in Ancient Greece (Pre-Socratics through Aristotle). In doing this, I will show a movement from myth to more science based cosmologies. I will then examine the Buddhist Cosmology, which is somewhat separated from Ancient Greek thought. After all of this, I will examine the question of which is more correct, Science or Myth. Before continuing a clear definition of “myth” needs to be established. The term myth has multiple meanings. Webster’s II Dictionary, defines it the three different ways. “1. A traditional story that deals with supernatural beings, ancestors, or heroes who serve as primordial types in a primitive view of the world. 2. A real or fictional story that appeals to the consciousness of a people by embodying its cultural ideals or by giving expression to deep commonly felt emotions.

3. A fictitious or imaginary person, idea, or thing.” For the sake of this essay, I would like the second definition to apply to my use of the word myth. The term myth should not be thought of as fictitious or primitive. The possibility for the myth to be real should always be considered. Some of the earliest known philosophies on the creation of the Earth come from the works of Hesiod. In his Theogony he attempts to explain the creation of the Earth, and all that surrounds him, using myth. In the myth Hesiod anthropomorphizes the cosmos. He tells of “Chaos” being the first to come into being, then he goes on to describe how each of the gods of the cosmos comes in to being. The gods of the cosmos are all related to some characteristic of our universe.

They can be physical parts or concepts (similar to Plato’s idea of the forms). For example the line, “Earth first bore starry Heaven, equal to herself, to cover her on every side, and to be an ever-sure abiding-place for the blessed gods.”(Theogony, 126) describes both the act of birth, which is a human characteristic, and physical parts of the universe being gods (Heaven meaning the stars, and the Earth). He also has gods, such as Eros, which represents the concept of Love. Two main issues the come up during discussions of cosmology are how the universe was created and out of what was the universe created. In the Theogony, Hesiod has the world created out of gods that are human by nature and to create this universe the gods reproduced. Hesiod’s theories of the universe can clearly be classified as myth, since there is no scientific background for it. The philosophers to follow Hesiod moved slightly away from this. The Pre-Socratics begin to de-anthropomorphize the universe. Even later, in the works of Socrates and Plato, the universe is completely de-anthropomorphized. The Pre-Socratics focus more on what the universe was made of than how it was created.

They typically chose a single element that everything consisted of and tried to explain the world according to that element. Sometimes these elements were one of the basic four elements; earth, fire, air, and water. Sometimes they were more abstract such as Anaximander’s theory. “…The principle element of existing things was the aperion… it is neither water nor any other of the so-call elements, but some other aperion nature, from which come into being all the heavens and the worlds in them.”(Hetherington, pg. 58) The Pre-Socratics based their theories on insight and observations. For this reason their theories are both mythical and scientific. Because some of their choices of what the key element is are based on instinctive feelings, they can be considered myth. On the other hand, they support their ideas through observations and experience making the ideas scientific. Science is defined one way in Webster’s II Dictionary to be “Knowledge that is acquired through experience.” The Pre-Socratics were not completely scientific because not everything they theorized was based on experience, but they were not as mythical as Hesiod either.

Aristotle’s concept of the universe was mostly scientific. Since Aristotle was the tutor of Alexander the Great, he had access to a wide variety of cultures. By gathering information from all of these cultures, he was able to analyze the world from a scientific perspective. He came up with four fundamental theses to the universe. 1.) The universe was Geocentric, Earth centered. 2.) The universe contained two separate worlds, one that spanned out to the moon and it was ever changing, and another that was from the moon out that was unchanging and made of the fifth element (ether). 3.) The universe did not consist of any void or empty space within the inner world. 4.) The only motion of the planets was that of uniform circular motion around the center of the universe. More important than Aristotle’s four theses were the scientific methods he used to establish them. For example, in determine that there was no void, Aristotle argues, “If water were twice as thick as air, an object should move through water with half the speed it moved through air. But void with no thickness made such a ratio nonsense; it meant dividing by zero.” (Hetherington, pg. 99) From examining the history of cosmology in Ancient Greece, it becomes clear that there was an evolution away from myth and towards science. What are some of the reasons of why this could be? A likely answer is that the evolution came about out of an adaptation to the environment. Ancient Greece was a very volatile area to be a part of. Greece was established in an area mainly known for warring.

A history of Ancient Greece is mostly a timeline and description of the various types of war that occurred there. Because of this factor, the need for science increased. Aristotle spent his time studying the natural environment. By doing so he could make fairly reliable predictions (some of which we still believe to be true today) of the physical world. If one can predict the workings of the physical world, they will have a better chance of succeeding in battle. The constantly active environment in Greece lead to the development of science, but what results would we find in a civilization that did not have interaction with others? To examine this question, I will break down the Buddhist Cosmology and see the affects of the near isolation from Western civilization.

The Buddhist cosmology is summed up as, “a single, circular world system surrounded by a mountain of iron… above this circular surface is a series of four meditations (dhy-ãna) or “meditation realms” as they are generally designated. The successive divisions of the meditation realms into seventeen heavens mark the progress of the srãvaka… Detachment from all the mediation realms through the practice of meditation eventuates in the extinction of nirvãna.” (Kloetzi, pg. 3) Given this information about the Buddhist cosmology, it is clear that their world is more focused on the spiritual than the physical. It is described in a physical manner (mountain of iron), but all of the different stages of the world are attainable through mediation and spiritual growth. It is clear that the Buddhist did not believe that the world they were describing was the world we see with our eyes. They believed that they were describing a world that was beyond our own perception. The world wasn’t something that we can view with our senses, but instead it could only be understood through meditation. Buddhist beliefs about the workings of the universe were also very spiritually centered. “Everything we apprehend in the world is mere illusion.” (French, pg. 61) This statement was considered the core truth behind human interaction in the world. If everything in the world were an illusion, then it would be impossible to use science to determine the workings of the universe. Science could only be used to predict how the illusion will act and respond to different situations. With this concept brought to life, the only thing that could be used to explain the universe is myth.

A Buddhist parable about a man walking through the forest helps describe their belief of reality in the world. It is summed up as follows. “A man is walking a narrow path in a sun-dappled forest. Before his on the path, amid the leaves and streaks of light, he suddenly sees a very large coiled snake. Shocked and afraid, he noiselessly turns to hide behind a tree and waits, anxiously aware of the great danger. In time, he ventures a look around the tree once more and refocuses his eyes. He focuses again. Then he comes back to the path and stares down at the snake. He sees that it is not a snake but a heavy, coiled rope in front of him. With a wave of relief, he bends down to pick it up and finds that the rope, worn with age, disintegrates in his hands into tiny strands of hemp.” (French, pg. 61) This parable shows the three levels of reality according to the Buddhist tradition. The first level is that of the reality we perceive with our senses, the physical world we interact with everyday. This world is the illusion of the snake. The second level of reality is still somewhat illusionary. In the second level we will see things as they relate to the third level of reality. The reasons for the illusion of the first reality become clear in the second reality. In the third reality the truth is found. This third reality is on the level of nirvãna and is only reached through a lifetime, or many lifetimes, of meditation. Multiple lives, reincarnation, is another important aspect of the Buddhist thought.

The idea of karma plays a major role in the lives of Buddhists. “In Buddhism, an individual experiences rebirth into this world and begins the volitional production of both good and bad karma, or lay, which will determine his or her future rebirth and chances for enlightenment.” (French, pg. 63) To reach enlightenment is the highest standard for the Buddhists, which might be why nirvãna is placed on the outer most edge of their world. To reach enlightenment one must have developed a high level of good karma. Those that do not reach enlightenment in their lifetime are reborn into the world, and the life given to them is based on the level of karma they were at when they died. This makes karma not only important because it is the way to reach enlightenment, but also because it will provide a better life. After discussing the cosmogonies of different cultures, we have come across to different methods of thought. These being, myth and science.

We have seen the Greek thought move from myth to science, and we have seen the Buddhist thought focus in on myth. The question arises, which method of thought is better or more accurate? Ask an astronomer or a physicist, and they will probably tell you that science is more accurate. Ask a Buddhist monk or a Zen master and they might tell you that myth is better (if the definition of myth is presented to them properly). The physicist will argue that science has evolved so far that we can accurately predict the motion of the planets, we can explain the process of recreation, etc. This is a very strong argument for using science to explain the universe. The Buddhist monk will reply that we only believe that we know those things and that it is just a part of the illusion of the first reality. This won’t convince the physicist, but it does open another door. A person who opens their minds to all the possibilities will not be able to rule out the idea that everything we perceive could simply be an illusion presented to us. Science itself could be the illusion. If the entity that set up the illusion (if there is one) wanted the illusion to be believable, they most likely would place a set of laws on the illusion to keep it consistent. These laws could be the laws that we are now discovering and calling science. This is just one of many possible arguments for myth being the method of explanation of the universe. A scientist might not agree and say that this argument is implausible, but their only evidence against it would be the science that has been declared illusionary. By no means am I stating that myth is the proper method of explaining the universe. I am merely stating that it, and science, are possible explanations. Which one to believe in is complete up to the individual.

Bibliography:

Bibliography: Hetherington, Norriss S. Cosmology : Historical, Literary, Philosophical, Religious, and Scientific Perspectives. New York & London: Garland Publishing, Inc, 1993. French, Rebecca Redwood. The Golden Yolk : The Legal Cosmology of Buddhist Tibet. Ithaca & London, Cornell University Press, 1995. Kloetzli, Randy. Buddhist Cosmology. Delhi, Motilal Banarsidass, 1983.

Posted in Uncategorized

Some of the worlds most compelling relationships have their roots in classical mythology

Some of the worlds most compelling relationships have their roots in classical mythology

Mythology

Some of the world’s most compelling relationships have their roots in classical mythology. Many different religions have stories or ideals that have similarities to the relationships seen in ancient Greek mythology. From the interaction of mortals and gods we see how different writers viewed religion, family, and society. More specifically we see how the gods influence the way of life of a mortal. In Homer’s Odyssey there are many instances where the gods help mortals through their struggles. However, at the same time, there are situations when gods use their power to all but destroy the lives of the mortals who have displeased them. One of the most intriguing relationships between god and mortal is that of Athena and Odysseus. There are many times when Athena gives Odysseus the helping hand needed to succeed in his ventures to return to Ithaca. The roles that the gods play in the Homeric world compared with Euripides and Sophocles have great similarities as well as differences.

Looking at how Athena seems to take care of Odysseus, it seems that the gods, perhaps only Athena, tend to take a liking to mortals occasionally. You could draw the conclusion that Athena seems to like Odysseus’ family. She shows almost as much interest in Telemachos as she does Odysseus. “Likening herself to Mentor in form and in voice: “Telemachos, already your well-greaved companions are seated at the oars awaiting your urging. Let us go, so that we may not long delay from the journey.”

(Book II, pg 26, lines 401-404) In this passage Athena has taken the form of Mentor, a good companion of Odysseus, and has instructed Telemachos “to go in a ship onto the murky sea to learn of the return of my father who is gone so long.” (Book II, pg 23, lines 262-263) Athena then says, “…hereafter you will not be a coward or senseless. If there is really instilled in you the good might of your father and you are as he was to achieve both word and deed, then the journey will not be fruitless or unachieved.” (Book II, pg 23, Lines 270-273) The significance of these lines is that Athena is telling Telemachos, in the form of Mentor, that he will be protected and will indeed find information concerning his father on this voyage. In Book VII, Odysseus walked through the Phaeacians; however they did not perceive him. “She shed a divine fog about him, with kind thoughts in her heart.”(Book VII, pg 89, lines 41-42) The Phaeacians do not take kindly to one coming from somewhere else. Athena, knowing this, shed the fog around him so he could safely get to the house of King Alcinoos. Based on these two passages, Athena seems to have a special place in her godly heart for Odysseus and Telemachos. All throughout “The Odyssey”, Athena acts as the balancing force for Odysseus. She counteracts the situations that Poseidon puts Odysseus in. For the entire book the relationship between Odysseus and Athena, and Telemachos and Athena is constant. It never really changes in any shape or form. She sometimes takes a different form (i.e. Mentor), but generally they know it is Athena. The relationship between Athena, Odysseus, and Telemachos is like that of a mentor or guide. She provides them with information to help them through their troubled times. She also uses her divine powers to give them a leg up on the situations that are trying to hold them back.

Another relationship that is important to look at is quite different than that of Athena and Odysseus. At the end of Book VII, Odysseus’ men slaughter the cattle of The Sun God, Apollo. They were specifically told not to touch his cattle. Apollo is extremely angry about the disrespect shown to him. Zeus helps to destroy Odysseus’ ship and all his men. “I shall smite their swift ship soon with a gleaming bolt into small pieces, and burn it in the middle of the wine-faced ocean.” (Book VII, pg 172, lines 387-388) It is important to note that in this situation, Zeus is acting on the behalf of Apollo. Sometimes Zeus is thought of as an objective figure. Clearly this is not the case in this situation. He understands that Odysseus’ men have disrespected a god, and they should have to pay for it. The relationship between Zeus and Odysseus is not necessarily as horrible as it appears in this instance. Zeus has said that he actually admires Odysseus for his perseverance.

In Sophocles’ “Oedipus the King” the relationship that Apollo has with the people of Thebes is not a bad one. It may appear as though he dislikes the city or the people, but he knows the truth about what is going on. We must first look at the city of Thebes. The city is on a downward spiral so to speak. Apollo brings to light the murder of Laius. “Apollo commands us now- he could not be clearer, “Pay the killers back-whoever is responsible.” (Lines 120-123) Apollo knows that Oedipus killed him. He says that the city will not be cleansed of its “miastor” until they catch the murderer of Laius. Apollo is seen in this Sophoclean play as a healer. Not only does he have the ability to heal Thebes from its downfall, he wants to help the people of the city.

When you directly compare the role that Apollo plays in “The Odyssey” with his role in “Oedipus the King” we see two different sides to The Sun God. Homer writes him as an angry disrespected god that wants nothing but vengeance for the theft of his Hyperion Cattle. He cares nothing for the stupid mistakes of the mortal men in Odysseus’ crew. They did not show him proper respect so they must be punished (killed) for it. In “Oedipus the King” Apollo is the god of Thebes. People sacrifice to him and worship him. He is referred to by Sophocles as the healer. He will set the town straight once they get rid of the pollution. The pollution that Apollo refers to is the murderer of King Laius. Apollo is referred to as a nice, people loving god. For the people of Thebes, Apollo is a forgiving and healing god that wants to help his city. This is a constant relationship throughout the rest of this story. The difference in how Apollo is portrayed by Homer and Sophocles shows how the writers, as well as the people, adapt the gods to fit the needs of their societies and way of life.

In Euripides’ “Medea”, the relationship between The Sun God, Hyperion, and Medea is evil. Medea completes her quest of revenge over Jason. She has killed her children and caused him extreme grief. Hyperion provides Medea with an escape vessel to flea from Corinth. The chorus says that gods work in strange ways that often are not revealed to mere mortals. Sometimes they cause events to happen that just don’t seem right. In this particular story, the gods seem to be on the side of Medea. Her husband divorced her to raise his standings in society. The gods did not seem to see this as honorable or noble. This seems to be the reason that they allowed Medea to follow through with her extreme plan for revenge.

The interaction of the divine and mortal varies from the works of Homer, Sophocles, and Euripides. Homer displays the relationship between Athena and Odysseus as one where she helps him through his struggles because of his true natured heart. In Sophocles, Apollo is known as the healer. He is described as a good god that cares about the people of Thebes. This is almost the opposite of the role that he plays in “The Odyssey”. Homer describes him as vengeful god. He wanted Odysseus and his men to pay for taking his cattle. When we see The Sun God in “Medea” he plays a role that is deceitful and mysterious. He gives Medea the means by which she escapes Corinth. Each prolific writer has their own way to show the differences in how the gods interact with mortals. Though the gods are similar in each text, the relationships they hold with mortals vary and change to fit each story.

Bibliography:

Posted in Uncategorized