This paper must (3)

This paper must (3)

Natalie Rivero

Sexual Orientation in HDEV 453

Professor Malia Lee Womack, PhD

10/15/2022

Women in the Labor Market

There is still a big workforce between men and women in the labor market. I argue that assessing women in the labor market should be included in the syllabus. I will analyze the study” Rising educational attainment, yet stagnant female labor force participation” by Assaad et al. (45) which relate to our course outline in the module: through the lens of Gender—A Social Construction, Family—A Socio-Political Institution and Reproductive Choice and Restrictions. I will use the sources by Cameron et al. (241). Female labor force participation in Indonesia and Women’s Situation in the Labour Market database that builds on and enriches our class materials by assessing women in the labor market study.

This research will discuss and assess how women work in the market industry. Recent studies have revealed that even if employment for women has risen, there is still a huge gap between them and men. The primary goal of the research will be to assess the women’s situation in the labor market. Looking at how Assaad et al. (43) have presented their research findings, women remain poorly underrepresented in the labor market. The study will be anchored on the analysis of the mentioned sources to come up with a comprehensive conclusion why women remain underrepresented in the labor market. Introducing this study to the syllabus will help students get the necessary information and remove barriers that prevent females from participating in the labor industry.

The urge to study why labor force projections for women are decreasing will also be important in this study. The research has shown that employment rates for women have risen, they are still far behind those of men. The research links social-political institutions, work environments, and other work gender-based factors that have contributed to the decline of women’s participation in the labor market. For example, women work more part-time, are paid less, and often carry out more private domestic and care responsibilities. Introducing the mentioned factors to the syllabus will help the curriculum developers get the message and push for government attention to introduce policies that balance labor participation in the market without gender discrimination.

A cross-sectional research design will be adopted in the research. Understanding sexual and reproductive Choices and restrictions that have impacted the decline in women in the labor market will be a very important study. There is a need to understand why major companies restrict women from leading in those organizations. Looking at education statistics, women are reported to be increasingly well qualified: more females than men graduate from universities globally, but the number doesn’t reflect that in the labor market. For men and women to engage equally in the labor market, the syllabus has to contain enough information to educate people from a younger age that caring responsibilities are shared equally. The masculine mentality grows with people from a younger age, but with education materials about equality, this will no longer be a concern.

Works Cited

Assaad, Ragui, et al. “Explaining the MENA paradox: Rising educational attainment, yet stagnant female labor force participation.” Demographic Research 43 (2020): 817

Cameron, Lisa, Diana Contreras Suarez, and William Rowell. “Female labour force participation in Indonesia: Why has it stalled?.” Achieving Inclusive Growth in the Asia Pacific 241 (2020).

“Women’s Situation in the Labour Market.” European Commission – European Commission, 19 Sept. 2022, https://ec.europa.eu/info/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/gender-equality/women-labour-market-work-life-balance/womens-situation-labour-market_en#:~:text=Women%20remain%20underrepresented%20in%20the,men’s%20employment%20stood%20at%2078.5%25.

Posted in Uncategorized

Nate Salas

Nate Salas

Nate Salas

Thank you for your input Nate. You hit the nail the head; the Kennewick Man controversy has a lot to do with the with who owns the rights to the remains of Kennewick. Various tribes including Native Americans as well as Indians lay claims to the remains as they were both convinced that Kennewick was their kin. Without a doubt, deciding such as case is difficult because it is a high profile case which makes it the center of attention. The issue is also complicated by the fact that the remains are rather old; they are estimated to be about 9000 years old. Although there are modern and improved analysis methods that can be employed to decide the tribe that is the closest kin, it would take a lot of testing to narrow it down. Although a bit farfetched, the only way out of the high profile case is for one of the tribes to compromise and let their counterpart have the rights to the remains.

Juliet Manikins

Hello Juliet,

Thanks for your input into the discussion. I agree with you that the religious and scientific issues at the center of the Kennewick Man controversy have a lot to do with the tribal lands where his remains were found. Because the skeleton estimated to be about 9000 years old was found on tribal land, they seek rights to Kennewick’s remains. However on the other hand, scientific analysis has found that the remains are closely linked to Native American tribes. In my viewpoint, there is only one way for this high profile case to be settled; if one of the parties compromises and concedes defeat. At the same time, it is only right if the Kennewick Man’s kin get rights to the remains so that they can bury him well in line with their culture.

Posted in Uncategorized

Research Proposal Assignment

Research Proposal Assignment

Nathaniel Meals

GSW 1120

14 March 2018

Research Proposal Assignment:

Some helpful hints on the annotated bibliography

When composing entries for your annotated bibliography, consider the following:

evaluate authority or background of author

comment on intended audience

compare or contrast this work w/ a previously cited entry

explain how this source sheds light on your research topic

Additionally, there are two possible analytical approaches you can follow as you detail the specifics of a given source:

Informative Approach

present thesis

neutral summary/synopsis of source

outline the main arguments used to defend thesis

highlight any controversial/exceptional evidence

state conclusion

Evaluative Approach

present thesis

assess source’s strengths/weaknesses

explain why this source is interesting to you or helpful

list what kind of and how much information is provided

evaluate usefulness: How do you anticipate this source contributing to your research paper?

These approaches need not be mutually exclusive. I recommend blending the informative and evaluative. Begin with the informative. Objectively explain the source’s thesis. Then summarize the source, paying special attention to its main arguments. Following this, transition into an evaluative examination in which you assess the source’s strengths and weaknesses, using specific information to verify your assessment. Finally, consider the source’s overall helpfulness and usefulness to your research project.Sample Annotated Bib. Entry:

Larson, N., Hannan, P. J., Fulkerson, J. A., Laska, M. N., Eisenberg, M. E., & Neumark-Sztainer, D. (2014). Secular trends in fast-food restaurant use among adolescents and maternal caregivers from 1999 to 2010. American journal of public health, 104(5), 62-69.

Within this article, the authors researched the effects that fast food and food made outside of the home can be traced to increased weight as well as poor nutrition. They also found by families eating together, the adolescents within the family tend to have healthier lifestyles. This research fits with the idea of my research topic as Americans are becoming more reliant of fast food with larger portion sizes rather than home cooked meals with smaller portion sizes, which is an important aspect to Europeans. This will support the argument that smaller portion sizes are beneficial.

Posted in Uncategorized

National Aeronautics And Space Administration

National Aeronautics And Space Administration

National Aeronautics And Space Administration On May 25, 1961, John F. Kennedy delivered one of the most memorable State of the Union addresses in the history of the United States. “I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely to the earth” (http://www.cs.umb.edu/jfklibrary, President John F. Kennedy’s Special Message to the Congress on Urgent National Needs). With those words, Kennedy launched a new era of space exploration in the United States. Although the National Aeronautics And Space Administration was created in 1958 by the National Aeronautics and Space Act (http://www.hq.nasa.gov, Key Documents), and the Russians already launched the first satellite into space in 1957, the US was still at a stand still on the subject. What the country needed was a wake-up call, and that is exactly what it got from one of the most celebrated speakers in its history. The new era promised much, but expected little. From USA’s struggle to be the dominant world power in the Cold War Era, to the careless depletion of natural resources in the Information Age, space exploration and astronauts were and will be the real keys to the new millennium and beyond. Before looking into the future, or even evaluating the present, one must look in detail at the history of the space project. The missions that gave scientists and engineers the necessary data and experience to make new, safer, more reliable and intricate equipment were launched long before there was realistic talk of sending probes to Mars. The astronauts that helped shape the training programs, took the beatings of primitive flight tests, and died in order to serve their country were born before World War II. And even the Russian Space Program was crucial to what the space program is today. It fueled competition, and provided more resources for American engineers. Until Apollo 11, they were ahead of the Americans in almost everyway, with their launch of Sputnik, a unmanned satellite in 1957, and their countless firsts in orbiting and space walks. Yuri Gagarin was the first man in space. Although most of the missions that have been launched have been important in their own ways, some missions just stand out, whether it was the first step on the Moon, or the first mission to Mars. NASA’s first high profile program was Project Mercury, an effort to learn if humans could survive in space. It was the prelude to the later missions, and it gave NASA the necessary data to build better, and more comfortable ships for humans to stay in space for extended periods of time. The first launch of the Mercury program was the LJ-1 on August 21, 1959. At thirty-five minutes before launch, evacuation of the area had been proceeding on schedule. Suddenly, half an hour before launch-time, an explosive flash occurred. When the smoke cleared it was evident that only the capsule-and-tower combination had been launched, on a trajectory similar to an off-the-pad abort (http://www.ksc.nasa.gov, Mercury: LJ-1). The first mildly successful spacecraft launch occurred September 9, 1959. Although the BJ-1 ship experienced some problems, and the timing on some of the separation procedures was off, the capsule made it back to earth some seven hours after lift-off. The capsule orbited the earth for approximately thirteen minutes (Mercury: BJ-1). Mercury mission MA-5 was the first to carry live organisms into sub-orbit. Although Enos – a chimpanzee, was not a perfect substitute for a human, he served as a good test for the environmental controls of the capsule. He orbited the earth in total weightlessness for over three hours and upon landing was in perfect physical condition (Mercury: MA-5). On May 5, 1961, Freedom 7 was the first launch to carry humans into space. Alan B. Shepard, Jr. was the only crewmember, and the successful mission lasted for over 15 minutes (Mercury: MR-3). More manned flights from the Mercury series followed, highlighted by the Friendship 7, where on February 20, 1962, John Glenn was the first American in actual orbit, and he orbited the earth three times for a little under five hours (Mercury: MA-6). The last mission from the Mercury project came on May 15, 1963, where L. Gordon Cooper was in orbit in the Faith 7 for over a day. Total weightless time was over thirty-four hours, and the mission was celebrated and deemed more than successful (Mercury: MA-9). Gemini missions followed which built on the success of the Mercury flights, and basically followed the same outlines, except with a crew of two astronauts. The most monumental program in the history of the US came next, following the late President Kennedy’s mission of landing a person on the Moon. The Apollo project featured many milestones, and also some setbacks. The Apollo 1 mission was a huge failure as astronauts Virgil Grissom, Edward White, and Roger Chaffee lost their lives when a fire swept through the Command Module (Apollo 1). After a few more test flights, Apollo 8, launched on December 21, 1968, was the first manned lunar orbital mission, staying in the Moon’s orbit for twenty hours, making ten circles (Zimmerman, 6). While the flights before were all important, the most celebrated and documented mission in the history of the US was the Apollo 11, where Neil A. Armstrong, Michael Collins, and Edwin E. Aldrin, Jr. were the first to land on the Moon. The mission launched without any delays on July 16, 1969, and even the crewmembers could barely grasp the magnitude of their mission. Before the flight, while the astronauts were being strapped in, Michael Collins had this to say, “Here I am, a white male, age thirty-eight, height 5 feet 11 inches, weight 165 pounds, salary $17,000 per annum, resident of a Texas suburb, with black spot on my roses, state of mind unsettled, about to be shot off to the Moon. Yes, to the Moon” (http://www.ksc.nasa.gov, Apollo 13). The flight went perfectly and on July 20 at 04:17 p.m. EDT, “The eagle has landed.” The first step on Moon, was at exactly 10:56:15 p.m. EDT, and Aldrin described the experience better than anyone else could, “We opened the hatch and Neil, with me as his navigator, began backing out of the tiny opening. It seemed like a small eternity before I heard Neil say, “That’s one small step for man . . . one giant leap for mankind.” In less than fifteen minutes I was backing awkwardly out of the hatch and onto the surface to join Neil, who, in the tradition of all tourists, had his camera ready to photograph my arrival” (Apollo 13). There were celebrations all around the world, especially in the US when Neil Armstrong place the US flag into the rocky lunar soil, and straightened out the creases. At this time, the two astronauts on the surface received probably the biggest phone call of their life, from the president. “Neil and Buzz, I am talking to you by telephone from the Oval Office at the White House, and this certainly has to be the most historic telephone call ever made . . . Because of what you have done, the heavens have become a part of man’s world. As you talk to us from the Sea of Tranquility, it inspires us to redouble our efforts to bring peace and tranquility to Earth…” (Bean, 47). On July 24, 1969, the astronauts splashed down in the Pacific Ocean, and within minutes, they were on the USS Hornet (http://www.ksc.nasa.gov, Apollo 13). More missions would follow, particularly the Apollo 13 mission, which was almost a complete disaster. Another mission to set humans on the Moon, was aborted after numerous failures – 200,000 miles from Earth. The astronauts did return in a Life Module. The last of the Apollo missions was the Apollo – Soyuz project that brought along the peace process started earlier by Nixon. The Viking project was the beginning of the Mars exploration, with the first two Viking lander and orbiter missions in 1976 (Vogt, 60). The atmospheric conditions taken from those missions serve as background information for today’s plans to send humans to Mars. The Voyager missions in 1979 were set to explore Saturn in detail, and Jupiter, Uranus, and Neptune as fly-bys (Vogt, 22). Although these missions served to collect a lot of data for future research and went to further planets, they were not as big as the manned flights to the Moon, particularly because space exploration was so new, and because the missions to the Moon had a patriotic feel to them. But history of astronauts would not be complete with out a more detailed information about some of the more famous astronauts. John Glenn, the first American in orbit on the Friendship 7 flight, was a pilot of over ninety missions in the Korean War (Kramer, 18). Chosen for his experience as well as his bravery in the war, he rose to the rank of Colonel in the US Marine Corps before going into NASA. He trained on crude machinery, before NASA came up with a set training program (20). He was 42 when he flew for the first time in his orbital mission (34), and he later became a Senator (39). Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin, both flew in the Apollo 11, and were the first two people to walk on the moon. They will always be remembered for their historic feat. Both Armstrong and Aldrin were 39 when they flew the Apollo mission. Armstrong was the first civilian in space, and in his first flight, he was the commander of the Apollo 11 mission. “Buzz” Aldrin was a Colonel in the US Air Force, and he was also chosen for his flying experience. Because Americans have lost interest in the space program without competition, there has not been another crop of astronauts as famous as those since the days of the Apollo mission. History of space flight has been very rich with accomplishments and milestones, but it appears that the world has reached a small bottleneck for technology in the area of space exploration. In addition, the lack of competition from any other country has slowed down the pace of innovation. With the Russian Space Program in shambles, as well as the whole country of Russia, the former USSR has not produced much useful technology lately. With a huge space station in the making, Russia is the only country that has not made the necessary parts for its completion, due to costly maintenance of their old space station, Mir, on which Russia and America have worked together on conducting experiments in the years after the USSR’s break-up. With Mir’s retirement, Russia now has the time and the resources to complete their part of the International Space Station which will accelerate space exploration. America has a few of its own projects going on right now, like the Galileo, the Pathfinder, and the Mars Polar Lander. Galileo is one of the probes out right now, scheduled to study the environmental conditions of Venus and Jupiter (http://galileo.jpl.nasa.gov, Galileo). The Mars Pathfinder, launched 2 years ago, has recently made some important discoveries about the water content on Mars, and the climate history of the “red” planet. Endless information has been sent back to earth about Mars’ ice caps, and rock formations, which have concluded that there was standing water on Mars, including oceans and seas (http://polarlander.jpl.nasa.gov/, Pathfinder). Although the Pathfinder has set the Mars exploration mission on the right track, the recent failures with the Mars Polar Lander mission have set back the program. The communication with the new lander could not be established and the ship is presumed lost. Critics say that the “faster, cheaper, better” approach taken with the lander has actually cost the government more than $36 million, and the valuable time of building and getting a new lander in position (Associated Press, 1A). Although the present movement of the space program appears to have stalled, maybe the future holds the answers. What is in the future of the space program ? Eventually, people will settle on the planets close to earth, if not because of exploration, but because of a lack of natural resources, which is catching up with mankind. Prototypes of human habitats on Mars are being made, and NASA hopes to have humans on Mars by 2050. The International Space Station should be well on its way to being built, and should be functioning in the next five to ten years (http://polarlander.jpl.nasa.gov, Future). New cheaper satellites and explorers are also coming in the near future. The new explorers with plasma propulsion are already in design, and are going to cost no more than one million per unit greatly slashing today’s price. They are also going to have a virtually inexhaustible fuel capacity, because of the special engine design using metal for fuel. This explorer will be so affordable that they could be sent out in many directions to explore countless star systems, and still be inexpensive enough to lose (Chaikin, 60). Plans that are being talked about right now may be a little far fetched sometimes, but even if some of them will materialize, the future looking bright indeed. Forty-eight years ago, John F. Kennedy set a grand plan in motion. His State of the Union address pushed the United States to its limits. Better training methods, and many schools for future astronauts have made a big difference in the level of the training, ability and intelligence of the future crews of American spaceships. Now, even with interest dwindling, and problems piling up, Americans have to try their best to stare in the face of adversity, and look at the big picture – the endless “playground” known as outer space.

Bibliography

Bibliography Associated Press. “NASA ends any hopes for Mars spacecraft.” The Baltimore Sun 8 Dec. 1999, final ed., sec. A: 1, 6. Chaikin, Alan. Apollo. Shelton: The Greenwich Workshop, 1998. Chaikin, Andrew. “The Great Debate.” Popular Science July 1998: 60 – 65. Kramer, Barbara. John Glenn: A Space Biography. Springfield: Enslow Publishers, Inc., 1998. Vogt, Gregory. Viking and the Mars. Brookfield: The Millbrook Press, 1991. Vogt, Gregory. Voyager. Brookfield: The Millbrook Press, 1991. Zimmerman, Robert. Genesis. New York: Four Walls Printing, 1998. “Apollo 1.” NASA. 5 Dec. 1999 “Apollo 13.” NASA. 5 Dec. 1999 “Future.” NASA. 5 Dec. 1999 “Galileo.” NASA. 5 Dec. 1999 “Mercury: LJ-1.” NASA. 5 Dec. 1999 “Mercury: BJ-1.” NASA. 5 Dec. 1999 “Mercury: MA-5.” NASA. 5 Dec. 1999 “Mercury: MR-3.” NASA. 5 Dec. 1999 “Mercury: MA-6.” NASA. 5 Dec. 1999 “Mercury: MA-9.” NASA. 5 Dec. 1999 “National Aeronautics and Space Act.” NASA. 5 Dec. 1999 “Pathfinder.” NASA. 5 Dec. 1999 “President John F. Kennedy’s Special Message to the Congress on Urgent National Needs.” JFK Library. 5 Dec. 1999

Posted in Uncategorized

NATIONAL COHESION AND VALUES INDICATOR TARGETS FOR

NATIONAL COHESION AND VALUES INDICATOR TARGETS FOR

NATIONAL COHESION AND VALUES INDICATOR TARGETS FOR 2020/2021 PERFORMANCE CONTRACT PERIOD

National Cohesion and Values – This is an indicator that aims to promote national cohesion, national values and principles of governance to create a transformed, cohesive, peaceful, united and values-driven nation.

MDAs will be required to implement commitments and way forward in the 2018 Annual President’s Report on National Values and Principles of Governance.

To achieve this, MDAs are expected to:

Implement at least five (5) commitments and submit in the prescribed format an Annual Progress Report on the implementation of the commitments and way forward captured in the 2018 Annual President’s Report on National Values and Principles of Governance (60%).

The following are the eight (8) commitments and way forward in the 2018 President’s Annual Report on measures taken and progress Achieved:

Align policies and implement programs, projects and activities to the realization of the Big 4 agenda;

Continual fight against corruption,ehance judicial processes and capacity building to facilitate dispensation of justice and adherence to the rule of law;

Continual public awareness creation, capacity building, enforcement and monitoring of national values and principles of governance;

Support the building bridges initiative by implementing interventions aimed at promoting national unity and nationhood.;

Continual preparedness, collaborative ways to enhance public safety and security and the fight against terrorism.;

Enhance collaboration between the two levels of government to entrench sharing and devolution of power

Implement measures to support gender mainstreaming and youth empowerment;

Enhance the protection of the environment by securing riparian lands, water towers, improving the national forest cover and other measures to facilitate sustainable development;

Submit in the prescribed format the Annual Report on measures taken and progress achieved in the realization of National Values and Principles of Governance (40%).

The above two reports shall be submitted to the Directorate of National Cohesion and Values by 15th January 2021 through hard copy OR emailed to

info2@cohesionandvalues.go.ke OR nationalvalues2017@gmail.com.

NB:

1.The Directorate will analyze MDAs’ annual reports and issue a certificate of compliance at the end of the performance contract period.

For any clarification/additional information regarding this indicator, contact the Directorate of National Cohesion and Values on tel.

No. 0758 – 948706 or 0712 – 382871 or email: nationalvalues2017@gmail.com.

Posted in Uncategorized

National Health Service in England

National Health Service in England

National Health Service in England

Student’s Name

Institution

National Health Service in England

The National Health Service body has touched lives of many people globally due to its significant contributions to the healthcare sector. The National Health Service Act advocated for universal free health care provided by a wide variety of physicians such as dentists, opticians as well as doctors among other hospital services. During this era poverty, sickness and unemployment in the society after the end of the world war. It was historically marked by the action of bringing all the physicians in the medicine field under one bracket where they could offer free healthcare services. The primary principles regarding National Health Service are precise that tax will fully finance the free health services to all people. It significantly meant that people have to pay for the health services offered but at their own means and time. The history of National Health Service in England since its establishment up to the year 2000 are discussed into a profound extent regarding the changes and developmental activities that has been instigated by the organization.

In the year 1948, Aneurin Bevan who was the health secretary took the initial step of launching the National Health Service at the Park Hospital in Manchester. It was a radical move which laid the background for the hospitals, doctors, nurses, dentists and the opticians to work together as in providing the free healthcare services to the civilians (Jones & Exworthy, 2015). It is a significant symbol of national cohesion where the public have free access to therapeutic services regardless of the wealth as well as the social class that one belongs to. It has been evident that the quality of medical services in various societies depend with the amount of payment leading to corruption and many other immoral vises in the community where the physicians take advantage of the patients’ ill-health. This was the kind of situation the National Health Service in England aimed to evade as everybody’s life and good state of health are valued and vital in enhancing the social-economic development of the nation.

In the evolvement of National Health Service, the introduction of charges prescription is a significant bit in the line of the organization’s history. In 1952, one shilling charge for the prescriptions was introduced after the decisions made by the people on top hierarchy, and it was later abolished in the 65s. After the abolition of medicament charges, the treatment remained unchanged up to the year 1968 when the charges were introduced again. Also, the launching of the program to fight against diphtheria and polio infections was an essential life-saving action initiated by the National Health Service (Guest, et al. 2015). According to the organization decision all the people under the age of fifteen years have to be vaccinated against polio and diphtheria. These two pandemics are life-threatening and detrimental to human well-being thus obtaining their vaccine as well as preventing their spread was a crucial achievement in the healthcare sector.

Availing of the contraceptive pills was another National Health Service organization objective that was vital and touching in the social living of people in the community. They significantly played an essential role in preventing unwanted pregnancy not only during the twentieth-century era but also in the society today. The number of women using contraceptive pills increased dramatically at the 1960s from around fifty thousand to about one million females. The hospital plan was another strategy that was criticized by the physicians where the National Health Service had to be divided into general practice, hospital and the local health authorities. During the calls of amalgamation, it was realized the establishment of district hospitals in the regions with high population. Also, the plan was essential in reducing the cost and time taken in the construction of new healthcare facilities.

The Report by Salmon recommended the expansion of the senior nursing staff as well as the energy put in trying to come up with practical measures to curb the disadvantages of the three segmented National Health Service structure. It was an effective way of recognizing the complexity of the National Health Service as well as the essential changes to be made to make the future objectives accomplishable. In the 1970s the computed tomography scans were introduced as they are critical to revolutionizing how the medic specialists examine the body (Abel-Smith & Titmuss, 2016). Apart from the MRI scans, which provide information about the organization that was introduced in the 1980s, the Keyhole surgery, black report, Aids health campaign and breast screening was also launched. The black report involves research regarding the inequality that exists in the healthcare centers where the black had the higher tendency to demise. The beginning of the Aids campaign was significant, and its impacts are experienced up to today as people are fully aware of the deleterious disease.

In the 1990s a variety of strategies were put in place by the National Health Service. These plans include National Health Service and the community care act; the initial National Health Service trusts developed as well as the organization’s direct launches. The community care act instigated that the healthcare managements manage their budgets and purchase the health services from other medical institutions (Morris, et al. 2014). The National Health Service direct launches play a vital role in the community of proving throughout online medical services. Lastly, in the year 2000, the National Health Service introduced the new health facilities that could be accessed at any time.

Throughout its history line, the National Health Service has been innovative and effective in offering the best health care services for free or even at a lower and affordable cost. As technology advances, with time great inventions are put in place, and they are vital in maintaining good well-being. National Health Service is a remarkable organization that has played recommendable activities in the medical field, and it touches both the present and future behavior.

References

Abel-Smith, B., & Titmuss, R. M. (2016). The cost of the national health service in England and Wales. Cambridge University Press.

Guest, J. F., Ayoub, N., McIlwraith, T., Uchegbu, I., Gerrish, A., Weidlich, D., … & Vowden, P. (2015). Health economic burden that wounds impose on the National Health Service in the UK. BMJ open, 5(12), e009283.

Jones, L., & Exworthy, M. (2015). Framing in policy processes: A case study from hospital planning in the National Health Service in England. Social Science & Medicine, 124, 196-204.

Morris, S., Karlsen, S., Chung, N., Hill, M., & Chitty, L. S. (2014). Model-based analysis of costs and outcomes of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down’s syndrome using cell free fetal DNA in the UK National Health Service. PloS one, 9(4), e93559.

Posted in Uncategorized

National Incident Management System (NIMS)

National Incident Management System (NIMS)

National Incident Management System

It is important to know that NIMS stands for National Incident Management System which is a structured framework which is used national wide by both the governmental and nongovernmental organizations in responding to natural disasters. Preparedness is one it components. Preparedness includes the crucial steps that are undertaken in forecasting the future and taking the initiative to ensure that future is secure (capola 2001). In our practical example it is inevitable for Greensburg having been hit by tornadoes once that totally destroyed come up with measure that will that the people are ready and well armed when such an event occurs in the future. One of the measures of preparedness includes training community so they may learn effective alert measures and how they could keep themselves safe. The staff also needs training so that they can effectively know how to manage incidents.

It is important that the designation of the incident commander be determined at the state or national level. Almost each and every single day communities do respond to very many emergencies effectively at the local levels. But there are some incidents that require a collaborative approach so as to effectively respond to the incidents. Thus local levels may not be able to mange some complicated incident such as tornadoes. The collaborative approaches include the state as whole and it multiple jurisdictions. They may also include the nongovernmental organizations, the private sectors and lastly the combination of disciplines or specialties. The management with NIMS ensures that people work together when the communities and the nation need them most. Thus at all times the NIMS is supposed to work at the state level and not to limited to the local community to deal with a disaster such as tornadoes( Mathew 2003).

The NIMS will always include the mitigating and recover efforts. This ensures that if the community suffers such a disaster there is a way to repair the damages that so that the scars caused by the incident are erasable. This for example includes putting up funds for the special programs such as building back the building that were destroyed. There are also businesses which may need to be put back. The combined efforts of the various organizations may be put together to foresee to this.

Loosing lives is so far the largest damage that tornadoes may cause and thus the most important long term safety need for any community is ensuring that the lives of the people are preserved (Capola 2001). This is by establishing weather stations which are well armed with necessary equipment that will undertake research at various periods to foretell a coming tornado so as to alert the people. The stations by using the modern technologies can also try to find out the cause of the previous tornado and if such causes can be prevented.

The best practices such as preparedness and use of combined efforts in responding to a disaster have proved to be very effective and could be used very effectively in response to the Greensburg event.

References

Capola,D.(2001) Introduction to international disaster management. United States. University Press.

Mathew. G(2003) Importance of disaster preparedness. California. Nova publishers.

Posted in Uncategorized

National Security Threats to Supply Chain

National Security Threats to Supply Chain

National Security Threats to Supply Chain

Student’s Name

Institutional Affiliation

Course Number and Name

Instructor Name

Due Date

National Security Threats to Supply Chain

There are many different types of security threats in the supply of different kinds of goods. When the goods being transported through a particular chain of supply are of exceptionally high cost, or they are valuable, security in most times is a considerable concern. This is because there are always individuals and even groups who always want to make the chain unstable, and therefore the goods cannot arrive at their destination. Apart from this, however, national security threats generally affect any supply chain, most of which are connected over an extended geographical area or from other countries. This is a big concern for everyone, and many efforts are in place to make sure that national security threats do not affect the supply chain of different goods. This paper focuses on national security threats and how they affect different types of supply chains.

Transnational crime is one of the national security threats to the supply chain. The FBI has a section dealing with these types of crimes. However, the fact that they are transnational still impacts the American people since some of the goods imported may be subject to these criminal groups (Basu, 2013). Therefore this is a big issue since these groups may even divert goods purchased and use them or re-sell them to other people.

Cyber terrorism is another type of national security threat which can affect almost everyone. With the growth of the internet of things, hacking groups and other individuals who want to maliciously steal or destroy other people’s property or information (Urciuoli et al., 2013). This affects the supply chain because a person wants to buy something, and they have to place an order online for that specific item. Sometimes cyber terrorists create a fake website, and a person ends up paying their money to the wrong address, and their money is never refunded, neither is the item they were trying to buy. This poses a significant problem because it disrupts the chain supply even before it begins. Instead, due to these issues, products delay as the company focuses on addressing cyber terrorism.

Pandemic threats and occurrences are also a threat to national security. From the view of pandemics being artificial, for example, in biological warfare, these become a significant threat to national security and supply chain. An example is coronavirus disease; even though it is not yet proven whether it is artificial, there is still a massive supply chain disruption due to its presence. Therefore, it is a security threat since the immunity and protection within the united states is surpassed by this disease, and those responsible have to find reasonable ways to explain the issue (Ivanov, & Das, 2020). People get sick, and in fear of getting the disease, some resign while others are sacked to reduce the costs of running different companies and organizations. All these disrupt the supply chain in that it becomes prolonged. For example, clothes or other products may stay up to 14 days before being picked to ensure that the owner who is to choose is not at the risk of being infected with the coronavirus.

References

Basu, G. (2013). The role of transnational smuggling operations in illicit supply chains. Journal of Transportation Security, 6(4), 315-328.

Ivanov, D., & Das, A. (2020). Coronavirus (COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2) and supply chain resilience: A research note. International Journal of Integrated Supply Management, 13(1), 90-102.

Urciuoli, L., Männistö, T., Hintsa, J., & Khan, T. (2013). Supply chain cybersecurity–potential threats. Information & Security: An International Journal, 29(1).

Posted in Uncategorized

Current Domestic Issue Policy Paper Obamacare

Current Domestic Issue Policy Paper Obamacare

Name:

Professor:

Course code:

Date:

Current Domestic Issue Policy Paper: Obamacare

There have been current media debates about the performance and effectiveness of the Patient Protection and Affordable care Act, commonly referred to as Obamacare, following its passage and implementation after bitter counter arguments by the economists, medical practitioners, media and the political class. The United States Health Care system were the subject of political campaigns for decades as regime after regime seeks to improve the terms of the Medicare and Medicaid Act that was passed in 1965. The US citizens have time after time demanded from the federal government, a healthcare plan that would guarantee equitable access to health care insurance and healthcare facilities. On March 23, 2010, president Barrack Obama signed into law United States federal statutes that seek to satisfy these demands from the people of America. The Patient Protection and Affordable care Act, commonly called the Affordable care Act of “Obamacare,” was a new regime’s answer to a problem that has dogged the US for nearly half a century. Together with the Healthcare and Education Reconciliation Act, it represented the most significant overhaul of the US healthcare system. However, this Act has been met by both support and critics. Whereas proponents of the Act praise the affordability and increased access to health care it accords citizens, its adversaries have taken to more political and economic dissection of the Act. It is no wonder that to date this Act continues to be a hot subject of debate and contention between different political wings.

None has been more critical of President Obama’s Healthcare plan than the Republican Party members. The Republicans have continued their assault of the “Obamacare” accusing the president of betrayal of the Americans. According to Landler and Michael, “there have been counter election-year attacks by Republicans on the law’s success and viability” (1). For example, in the party’s weekly address, the Indiana representative Todd Young passed on stories from residents in his state who were concerned that their insurance had been cancelled as a result of the affordable care Act. Todd’s rage seems to have been sparked by president Obama’s repeated reassurance of the public, in his speeches over the past four years, that they could keep their insurance plans if they liked them.

The scrutiny on the law recently emerged again following sustained audit. Obama recently tried to qualify that statement arguing that his meaning was that the people of America could keep their existing healthcare insurance. April 2014 Statistics shows that “the total number of enrollees exceeds by a million the target set by the administration” ( Landler and Michael, 1). However, even when the president tried to apologize for the Affordable Care Act’s rollout problems, the Republicans still could hear none of his apology. They kept on with the attacks and Wisconsin senator, Ron Johnson, sponsor of a bill to let people keep their existing healthcare insurance, used another one of the Republicans’ weekly address to call president Obama’s acknowledgement of the problems facing the rollout of the new healthcare plan a “phoney apology”. Johnson embarked on a mockery of the president’s speech criticizing that his fumble acknowledgement was like telling a dog owner you were sorry his dog died, but not acknowledging you had run over the dog. While acknowledging the problems facing the rollout of the new healthcare plan, president Obama revealed some progress made in ensuring reduced dependence on foreign oil significantly, Johnson focused on the challenges of the healthcare reforms. He argued that Obama was playing political fraud and that the US needed long-term solutions to Obamacare debacle.

On the other hand, the Democrats rallied behind the commander-in-Chief arguing that the problems with the disastrous rollout of the Affordable care Act will be fixed in good time to achieve the intended goals. The house minority leader, Nancy Pelosi, was quick to caution that this was not going to be an easy task. She insisted that what mattered most was the events that went on in the kitchen tables of the American people and how they would have more “affordability, more accessibility, better quality care, prevention, wellness, a healthier nation” (Rushe 1). The rollout of the “Obamacare” has been dogged with serious problems, especially with the federal website healthcare.gov ( PBS, 1). Coupled with uproar concerning Obama’s statement that no one would lose their health plan under the new reforms, the program has attracted criticism from both the Republican and Democrat quarters. Indeed, 39 House Democrats, under fear of being victimized in the 2014 midterm elections, voted for the Republican “Keep you Plan” Bill ( Rush, 1.). It is this event that prompted key democrats, including Pelosi, to publicly come out and support Obama’s healthcare reforms. Pelosi advises that this is an issue that ought to be dealt with, but did not warrant political asylum seeking. Her rationale is that the reforms were too valuable for the people of America and politicians should not be thinking about who gets re-elected in 2014. Instead, they should only see to it that Americans are well served by the new healthcare reforms. She rightly observes that nobody can foretell what will happen next year. However, she promises “democrats stand tall in support of the Affordable care Act” (Rush, 1).

In a possible move to resolve the existing problems with the Affordable care Act, president Obama seems to have yielded to pressure from both his party and the Republicans when he announced changes in the Act to address the rampant cancellation of insurance policies. While the move was meant to address a staunch problem that had threatened to ruin the president’s reputation and credibility in the eyes of the public, it raised a number of questions. The issues include; whether insurers would adjust, whether customers would need to pay higher premiums and whether the states would make the fix available. In his announcement, president Obama admitted that he was in the dark about many aspects of his crowning achievement of his presidency. Obama has appreciated that the federal government rules were an impediment to individual political ambitions and lamented the political damage he had caused for members of his party (Eilperin, Goldstein and Sun, 1).

Despite the many critics and support, facts about the Affordable care Act show better results. The Act had the intention to enhance access to cheap, valuable health insurance. Contrary to widespread myths, the Act has bettered healthcare quality and affordability since its enactment. Its specialized form of operation has also seen it help specific target groups. Among the most benefited are the elderly through a clause to improve community healthcare centers to help those who cannot access private healthcare services. “Eight million older Americans have saved $10 billion because of lower prescription drug costs under the law” (Landler and Michael, 1). In South Carolina, the Act has been implemented successfully. In the region, “18 districts are already implementing Aesop, [and they] have decided to employ additional personnel to keep up with the requirements are paying up to $43,000 a year” (Frontline, 1).

Judging from these facts, it is inevitable to conclude that the controversy that surrounds the Affordable care act was primarily a factor of a political interplay rather than a factor of merit. The Act in its bare essentials has the good of the American people at heart. However, this cannot be achieved without stepping on to some mighty shoes. These revelations show that the decision on the suitability or unsuitability of the Act ought to be left to the individual citizens rather than their political representatives. The current news coverage and debate in the Act is very healthy. The process should continue to enhance transparency and accountability in management of the program.

Works Cited:

Frontline Orangeburg Approves Aesop to Help With Healthcare Reform Requirements. Frontline

News. May 2, 2014. Washington D.C.

Landler, Mark and Michael, Shearapril “Enrollments Exceed Obama’s Target for Health Care

Act”. New York Times. 17 April, 2014. New York.

Rushe, Dominic. “Democrats rally behind president in defense of Obamacare.” The Guardian,17 November 2013. New York.

Eilperin, Juliet; Goldstein, Amy and Sun, Lena H. “Obama announces change to address healthinsurance cancellations.” The Washington Post, November 14, 2013.

PBS. at enrollment deadline, affordability may be real test of Affordable Care Act. The News

Hour 31, March, 2014.

Posted in Uncategorized

Current Events and the U.S Diplomacy

Current Events and the U.S Diplomacy

Current Events and the U.S Diplomacy

A presidential doctrine is usually an ideological platform, which is used by a president in order to advance a certain policy towards a region or a country. The doctrine is for the purpose of accomplishing established goals and policy on behalf of the United States. American interest in Greece as well as its people has existed for quite a long time even before the Truman Doctrine came into place (Frazier, 1999). The relationship was in both in unofficial and official levels as it had been witnessed. American government policies and public attitudes directed towards Greece have existed for a long time.

Washington saw a reason to ensure that Greece did not end up under the domination that the Soviet Union wanted to impose on them. Before, the Truman doctrine, the American government was not quite active in trying to support the efforts of the Greek. For a long time, American philhellenes had protected and supported the Greeks in their struggle for independence. America saw modern Greece as being a nation filled with many virtues and thus a suitable counterpart. Some of these virtues included republicanism, love of the arts and beauty, knowledge, freedom of thought and human dignity. Therefore, American policy makers worked hard to ensure that they accommodated Greece in every way possible (Spalding, 2006).

The Pre-Cold War association between Greece and America was motivated by the fact that both nations would benefit from each other’s political culture. The United States was indebted to quite some extent to ancient Greece because of its numerous democratic institutions. The philhellenes believed that they had to ensure that Greece was impacted by blessings of liberal and free institutions. Therefore, when America became aware of the intentions that the Soviet Union had for Greece it knew that it had to help its ally. It thus came up with the Truman Doctrine, which would ensure that military and economic aid would be provided to Greece. Truman told the American congress that the Doctrine was meant to ensure that people who were free were supported, as they were resisting subjugation attempts from outside pressures and armed minorities (Spalding, 2006).

Many nations in Western Europe came to believe that Truman was one of the best American presidents, especially after he came up with the Truman Doctrine. Countries that were affected by communism would be supported by the United States, and in the year 1947, the Marshall plan came into existence. It ensured that struggling countries in Western Europe would be provided with an economic foundation. Furthermore, the 1949 Atlantic Treaty ensured that the western nations would be supplied with military assistance as this would help in resolving the political and economic chaos of post Second World War. The measures would be effective in preserving Western Europe democracy and thus maintaining American freedom. Some of these western European nations were Italy, Iceland, France, Denmark and Belgium, among others (Lykogiannis, 2002).

Currently, it is evident that Greece is facing a debt crisis that has greatly affected its economy. However, it seems that the situation as well as the relationship that existed during the Truman Doctrine time has changed between the two countries. It seems that president Truman has been the only president who was interested in matters that affected Greece. The other presidents since then did not do anything to help Greece. Now that Greece is facing a crisis, the current American government is not doing much to assist it. There is no enough support being given to Greece because at the moment, the United States gains nothing by assisting Greece. This is opposed to the past when there was a Cold War and America had to ensure that it met its interests.

The Domino effect theory provided a good explanation as to why the United States wanted to help Greece so that other countries in Western Europe would embrace it as well. Turkey and Greece were the only obstacles that were preventing the Soviet Union from having control over the Mediterranean, a strategic and economic area. On the other hand, Truman saw this as an opportunity to use its military and economic strength in order to gain control over the Mediterranean region (Merrill, 2006). If they were to succeed, America would then find it easy to take over and control other countries, and especially those ones located in Western Europe. Therefore, the Doctrine was meant to change the behavior of Greece so that other countries would be influenced by it and thus be receptive of the American government. The Truman Doctrine was therefore a means for the United States to ensure that it would have more power than the communists.

In conclusion, the Truman Doctrine assisted Greece when it was experiencing many problems. In turn, the United States took advantage of the situation to make its might known. However, it is unfortunate that the Truman Doctrine is now no longer relevant as Greece is facing a crisis and nothing substantial is being done to help it. Indeed, the American intervention plan to help stop spread communism in Greece succeeded because of the Truman Doctrine.

References

Frazier, Robert. (1999). Acheson and the Formulation of the Truman Doctrine. Journal of Modern Greek Studies, 17, 2, 229–251.

Lykogiannis, Athanasios. (2002). Britain and the Greek Economic Crisis, 1944–1947: From Liberation to the Truman Doctrine. Missouri: University of Missouri Press.

Merrill, Dennis. (2006). The Truman Doctrine: Containing Communism and Modernity. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 36, 1, 27–37.

Spalding, Elizabeth. (2006). The First Cold Warrior: Harry Truman, Containment, and the Remaking of Liberal Internationalism. Kentucky: The University Press of Kentucky.

Posted in Uncategorized