Blog

Lifespan Case Study Project Guidelines 2

Lifespan Case Study Project Guidelines 2

Lifespan Case Study Project Guidelines

A case study is an in-depth look at the life experiences of a single person. For

this assignment, you will interview a single individual who has made it to the late

adulthood developmental period (i.e., they are at least 65 years of age) and

explore various topics that we have covered in this course.

This project (worth 100 points) is designed to:

Give you a ‘taste’ of what it’s like to be a developmental psychologist

Apply and discuss various concepts and key terms from a lifespan

perspective.

Provide you with an opportunity to compose a project using APA-style, a

style of citation and referencing that is adhered to in psychology as well as

numerous other fields

General Assignment Requirements:

Title Page and APA-style reference page is required (abstract & running

heads not required)

Font requirements: Times New Roman, Arial, or Calibri, size 12-point

Double-space between lines

One-inch margins all the way around

Five Pages Minimum of body/content

Utilization of at least four scholarly resources (the textbook and class

notes DO count as sources) (two must be from scholarly outside sources after 2005)

Wikipedia is not considered a reliable source and therefore is not

acceptable for use in this class.

APA-style in-text citations ARE required.

Remember that when using outside research, you must paraphrase the

information while still citing. You do not have permission to simply cut and

paste others’ works into your own.

Use of direct quotes should be kept to a minimum, but are perfectly

acceptable if citing dialogue from your interview

File must be uploaded in the proper location

Acceptable file formats include: .doc .docx or .pdf

Must be completed by the date and time indicated in the course schedule in

order to be eligible for full credit.

Twenty percent will be deducted from the final score of late

submissions for each day they are late until they no longer worth any

points.

Specific Paper Requirements:

Your paper will be divided into four parts (in your final paper, please label each

part as Part One, Part Two, Part Three, and Part Four):

Part One: Case Background (one paragraph minimum in length):

This section should include:

The person’s name (for confidentiality purposes, please use only first

names), age, and relationship to you

City/country where the person was born, city/country where they currently

reside, and with whom they currently live. Do they live in a house,apartment, assisted living facility, retirement community, etc..?

Current or former occupation, marital status, # of children/grandchildren

Part Two: Topical Investigation (two pages minimum in length):

This section should explore and apply various topics that we have covered this

semester to the person’s life. Below are some possible questions you can ask

your person (feel free to include the questions in this portion of the paper). Feel

free to explore topics beyond this list as appropriate.

How would you describe your friendships currently and how have your

friendships changed/evolved over the years?

What was work like as a young adult, middle adult, and older adult?

How has your level of stress changed or stayed the same over the years?

How have you coped with stress over the years?

What was your highest educational achievement and how did

school/academics influence you as a person?

How have your romantic relationships evolved over the years?

What is/was your relationship with your parents like over the years? How

about siblings?

How has your personality evolved over the years – has it been relatively

stable or has it changed?

How has your level of intelligence and/or cognitive thought evolved over

the years?

Do you have any areas of expertise?

Do you speak any second languages and if so, in what ways might it have

benefited you?

How have you changed morally over the years?

How have you changed emotionally over the years?

How would you describe your mental health over the years?

How would you describe your self-esteem now (that is, how do you feel

about yourself) and how might that differ or be the same as in earlier time

periods?

How has culture/religion/race/ethnicity/gender influenced your

development and have you ever experienced discrimination based on your

group membership?

How might your life be different/unique when compared to your peers?

Were you particularly impacted by any major historical events?

How has your memory abilities changed throughout the years?

Have you experienced any physical challenges in the past and how are

you doing physically now?

When it comes to children and/or grandchildren, how have those

relationships evolved over the years? If you don’t have any children or

grandchildren, how might this have impacted you positively and/or

negatively?

How has your diet/exercise changed over the years?

In your opinion, what is your greatest accomplishment?

Is there anything you still wish to accomplish in this lifetime?

What advice do you have regarding how to live a happy and healthy life?

Part Three: Theories (two page minimum in length, APA-style in-text

citations are required in this section):

This semester, we have explored many developmental theories. Select at least

two psychologists and/or theories from the list below and apply to your case. In

this section, you need to incorporate scholarly information from at least 2 sources

(your textbook and class notes each count as one source).

Mary Ainsworth

Jeffrey Arnett (see: Early Adulthood)

Noam Chomsky

Dexter Dunphy (see: adolescence, socioemotional development)

Erik Erikson

Joan Erikson

Sigmund Freud

Howard Gardner

Daniel Golman (see: Middle Childhood, socioemotional Development)

G. Stanley Hall (see: adolescence, storm & stress theory)

Lawrence Kohlberg

Gisella Labouvie-ViefDaniel Levinson

James Marcia (see: adolescence, identity)

Robert Peck

Jean Piaget

Robert Sternberg

Harry Stack Sullivan

George Vaillant

Lev Vygotsky

Continuity/Discontinuity Issue (see Chapters 1, 2)

Nature/Nurture (see chapters 1, 2, 3)

Neural network vs. information-loss view of aging

Original Sin/Innate Goodness/Tabula Rasa (see Chapters 1,2)

Parenting Styles

Personality

Social theories of aging including: disengagement, activity, continuity, and

socioemotional selectivity

Stability/Change Issue (See Chapters 1,2)

Temperament

Wear and Tear vs. Genetic Adaptation vs. Cellular view of aging

Part Four: Summary (1/2 page minimum in length):

This section should include a summary of your findings and overall impression of

this person’s life. In addition, I would like for you to answer the following

questions:

How would you describe this person’s development in terms of trajectory?

Would you say that his or her life is cyclical in nature? That is, is he or she

on a path to end up right where they started? Or is his/her life more of a

straight line, in which they are ending up in a completely different place

from where they started? Or would you consider a different trajectory

altogether?

What lessons did you learn from interviewing this person that you aregoing to apply to your own life so that you can be happy and healthy for as

long as possible?

Here’s a poem to inspire you in this section:

The Little Boy and the Old Man

By: Shel Silverstein

Said the little boy, “Sometimes I drop my spoon.”

Said the old man, “I do that too.”

The little boy whispered, “I wet my pants.”

“I do that too,” laughed the little old man.

Said the little boy, “I often cry.”

The old man nodded, “So do I.”

“But worst of all,” said the boy, “it seems

Grown-ups don’t pay attention to me.”

And he felt the warmth of a wrinkled old hand.

“I know what you mean,” said the little old man

Posted in Uncategorized

Lifes disappointments

Lifes disappointments

Life’s disappointments

Contents

TOC o “1-3” h z u Introduction PAGEREF _Toc381195462 h 1Coping with disappointment PAGEREF _Toc381195463 h 1Conclusion PAGEREF _Toc381195464 h 2

IntroductionIn life one is likely to face disappointments. Life’s disappointments come in different sizes and shapes and they occur to people of different ages though at the core exists a similar principle. Disappointments exist as a result of the difference between what one expects and what is there in reality. Depending on how deep the disappointment is one might experience a wide range of emotions such as sadness, hurt, jealousy or anger over a period of time.

Coping with disappointmentIf one is already in the throes of disappointment they should not be depressed instead one should sit down and the alternatives that may present themselves in the situation. Denial is very powerful therefore accepting the situation as it is very crucial. For instance if the disappointment is someone that has not come through in the intended way then one should let go and focus on things that they will get positive returns.

One should also draw inspiration fro their role models after being disappointed. Very many people around us can be role models as they come through difficult situations successfully. This can be friends, family members or even celebrities. Gaining strength from their life journey’s of this people enable one to move forward towards their future as well as from disappointing situations.

Talking to friends or family can help one get cope with the situation easily. Letting out the disappointment is very important this is by letting people around you know how one feels. People can give their ideas on how best one can handle the situation. One should not allow themselves to be victims but instead one should be ready to talk of about disappointments, acknowledge them and forgive those that disappointed them and move on. Holding on resentment that is negative will only weigh someone down .one should not look back but forge forward.

One should find hope and optimism in their life. If the particular situation that lead to the disappointment has failed then should look forward to other options that can work out. Creation of other goals and objectives as well as finding people that will cheer one also helps the situation. In life there are always positive things to aspire to therefore one should not be afraid of taking risks simply because of one or two disappointments that someone has been through.

Some disappointments have the potential of hitting someone hard and it often takes time before working them through and moving forward. One should therefore be patient with themselves as they go through that phase of recovery. Knowing that at the end of the day there is hope in every situation and therefore approaching a situation differently ensures that one gets through the situation and any other disappointment that they might come across.

ConclusionCoping with disappointments is just the same as coping with loss. Disappointments help one build their character and patience if one deals with them appropriately. When one copes with the disappointment in a healthy way then one will reach a point where they not only accept the situation but also learn from it. Coping with disappointment is very difficult but if one words through it then other opportunities present themselves.

Posted in Uncategorized

The article Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder a review of the essential facts by Daley D

The article Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder a review of the essential facts by Daley D

Life Span Development

Author

Institution

Date

Introduction

The article “Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: a review of the essential facts” by Daley D examined the various issues pertaining to the condition. It explains that ADHD refers to a complex disorder that results from genetic and environmental influences or factors. Daley explains that while there has been modification in the name for the last five decades, ADHD’s current diagnosis shares the core inattention, impulsivity, motor restlessness, and symptoms with the earlier terms. The earlier terms include hyperactive child syndrome, minimal brain dysfunction and attention deficit disorder. In addition, the writer states that the etiological explanations of the disorder are either environmental or biological. Biological explanations of the disorder include brain structure and genetics, as well as their bearing on neuropsychology. The predisposing environmental factors include diet and parenting. As concerning intervention methods, the writer focuses on psychosocial intervention and the use of medication. However, he acknowledges that the use of medication has been known to have side effects especially in the case of children below school going age. He also examines asserts the fact that very little is known concerning the relationship between the later expression of ADHD disorder and the early hyperactivity.

It is noteworthy that the writer has been very thorough in examining the predisposing factors and the causes of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. However, the intervention section has been virtually neglected in this journal. Unlike the other sections, the writer has not examined any specific methods of interventions that are used in treating Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, but only goes on to generalize in the form of medication and psychosocial intervention methods.

In addition, the writer has ignored the significance of dietary methods of treating Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Supplementing or modifying one’s diet would in fact remedy the symptoms that are associated with the disorder. In any case, he had acknowledged that the condition could also be caused by the diet of the individual. Would it not follow that changes in the diet would be effective in treating it? Studies show that an individual could eliminate toxic additives in the diet and consume more organic whole foods in order to remedy the problem (Selikowitz, 2009). Food dyes, synthetic sweeteners, processed foods and artificial additives have been shown to trigger abnormalities in the brain, which spurs uncontrollable behavior and inattentiveness. Given that diet plays a significant role in enhancing focus, behavior, and metal capacity, the writer could have done more than mention it among the causes.

In addition, the writer opines that parenting has a bearing on the occurrence of children as well as their parents. While this may be the case, it is noteworthy that the writer does not provide a clear relationship between parenting and the occurrence of ADHD. In addition, that assertion would raise question as to whether the disorder is an ailment or just a result of the environment. It is noteworthy that ADHD has been shown to have a relationship with an individual’s genetic makeup. In this case, the assertion that the condition would arise as a result of parenting raises questions as to whether parenting would have any impact on the genetic make-up of a child or even the parent. Science has shown that this is impossible, which raises questions as to the assertion that parenting causes ADHD (Selikowitz, 2009)

Conclusion

Much is unknown about ADHD, not only as pertaining to it very nature but also on its causes and even the possible remedies. Much still remains to be done on the issue in order to offer a clear explanation to these issues.

References

Mark Selikowitz, 2009. ADHD. London: Oxford University Press.

D. Daley. (2006). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a review of the essential facts

Child: Care, Health and Development journals, Volume 32, Issue 2, pages 193–204

<http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2006.00572.x/full>

Posted in Uncategorized

Life of Gabriel Garcia Marquez

Life of Gabriel Garcia Marquez

Life of Gabriel Garcia Marquez

Gabriel Gárcia Márquez Gabriel José García Márquez was born on March 6, 1928 in Aracataca, a town in Northern Colombia, where he was raised by his maternal grandparents in a house filled with countless aunts and the rumors of ghosts. But in order to get a better grasp on García Márquez’s life, it helps to understand something first about both the history of Colombia and the unusual background of his family. Colombia Colombia won its independence from Spain in 1810, technically making it one of Latin America’s oldest democracies, but the sad fact is that this “democracy” has rarely known peace and justice. In the beginning, there was of course Spain and the Indians, happily hating each other as the Spaniards tore the land up in quest for gold, El Dorado, religious converts, and political power. The English, too, played their part, with Drake attacking Riohachi in 1568 and the countless colonial squabbles of the next few centuries. Declaring itself independent from Spain when Napoleon ousted the Spanish King in 1810, the new country experienced a brief period of freedom and then was quickly reconquered in 1815 by the unpleasant and bloody campaigns of General Murillo. So much did their internal bickering allow their fledgling country to fall to the sword of Murillo, the period is immortalized in Colombia’s history with the colorful name of la Patria Boba, or “The Booby Fatherland.” Round two, however, fell to the Colombians, when Simón Bolívar reliberated the country in 1820 and became its very first president. In 1849, the country was sufficiently advanced enough to concretize their squabbling in the form of two political parties, the Liberals and the Conservatives, who exist to this day. These two parties form the political framework for much of García Márquez’s fiction, and understanding their true natures is both a key to his writing and, unfortunately, an important insight to Latin American politics in general. Although initially forming around the nucleus of two distinct and different ideologies, long years of bloody conflict have served to significantly erode the distinctions between the parties. The Conservatives and the Liberals are more like warring factions or clans than any parties with firmly established and radically different ideologies. Both tend to be repressive, both are corrupt, and both terribly abuse power when it falls into their hands; and throughout the sad history of Colombia, both parties have been more or less at war. It has often been said of Colombia’s parties that you do not join them, you are born into them; and indeed they act more as territorial and familial units than as peacefully functioning parties with distinct political platforms. In addition, the country is split into two main regional groups — the costeños of the coastal Caribbean, and the cachacos of the central highland. Both groups use those terms as pejorative of the other, and both view the other with disdain. The costeños tend to be more racially mixed, verbally outgoing, and superstitious. They are primarily the “descendants of pirates and smugglers, with a mixture of black slaves,” and as a whole are “dancers, adventurers, people full of gaiety.” The cachacos, on the other hand, are more formal, aristocratic, and racially pure, who pride themselves on their advanced cities such as Bogotá and on their ability to speak excellent Spanish. Traditionally, the tropical Caribbean coast has been a Liberal bastion, and the cool mountains and valleys of the interior tend to the Conservative side. García Márquez has often remarked that he views himself as a mestizo and a costeño, both characteristics enabling his formation and development as a writer. Throughout the nineteenth century, Colombia was wracked by rebellions, civil wars of both the local and national variety, and several coups d’etat.This century of bloodshed had its culmination in 1899, when the War of a Thousand Days began — Colombia’s most devastating civil war, a conflict that ended in late 1902 with the defeat of the Liberals. The war claimed the lives of over 100,000 people, primarily peasants and their sons. García Márquez’s grandfather fought in that war, and many of its veterans would eventually find their way into immortalization as fictional characters in his work. Another event that would influence his work was the prevalence banana industry and the massacre of 1928. Although coffee is generally considered Colombia’s main export, for the first few decades of the twentieth century, bananas were also of crucial importance to the economy. The banana trade had its principle manifestation in the United Fruit Company, an American outfit that had a virtual monopoly on the banana industry, which at the time was the only source of income for many of the costeño areas, including Aracataca. The UFC had unlimited economic power and tremendous political clout, but it was a corrupt and amoral company that abused its Colombian workers terribly. In October of 1928, over 32,000 native workers went on strike, demanding, among other such unreasonable things, toilets and payment in cash rather than company scrip. One night a huge crowd of them gathered to hold a demonstration. In order to quell the incident, the Conservative government sent in the troops, which fired on the unarmed workers, killing hundreds. Over the next few months, more people simply vanished, and finally the whole incident was official denied and struck from the history books. García Márquez would later incorporate the incident in One Hundred Years of Solitude. The next significant event that would eventually affect his writing was a period of time that he himself would live through, a horrible period of time called la violencia, or “the Violence.” The Violence has its roots in the banana massacre. At that time, one of the only politicians courageous enough to take a stand against government corruption was a man named Jorge Eliécer Gaitán, a young Liberal member of congress who convened meetings to investigate the incident. Gaitán began to rise in prominence, a champion of the peasants and the poor, but an annoyance to the powerful members of both parties, who viewed him with something akin to fear and loathing. Using radio as his medium, he heralded a time of change, a time when the people would take part in a true democracy and corporations would be forced to act responsibly. By 1946, Gaitán was powerful enough to cause a split in his own party, who had been in power since 1930. The split caused a Conservative return to power, and fearing a reprisal, they began organizing paramilitary groups whose ultimate purpose was to terrorize Liberal voters; which they did admirably, killing thousands of them by the end of the year. In 1947 the Liberals gained control of the Congress, putting Gaitán in charge as party leader. (Despite the Conservative’s efforts, the voter turnout was

t a record high.) Tensions rose, and on April 9, 1948, Gaitán was assassinated in Bogotá. The city was convulsed by lethal riots for three days, a period called el Bogotázo and responsible for 2500 deaths. La violencia entered a more deadly phase. Guerrilla armies were organized by both parties, and terror swept through the land. Towns and villages were burned, thousands — including women and children — were brutally murdered, farms were confiscated, and over a million peasants immigrated to Venezuela. In 1949, Conservatives even gunned down a Liberal politician, in the middle of giving a speech in the very halls of Congress! The Conservatives finally dissolved Congress, declared the country to be in a

State of siege, and Liberals (now conveniently branded “communists”) were hunted, persecuted, and murdered. The country was ripped apart; la violenciawould claim the lives of some 150,000 Colombians by 1953. The Violence would later become the backdrop to several of García Márquez’s novellas and stories, most notably In Evil Hour. His Family the most important relatives of García Márquez were undoubtedly his maternal grandfather and grandmother. His grandfather was Colonel Nicolás Ricardo Márquez Mejía, a Liberal veteran of the War of a Thousand Days. He lived in Aracataca, a banana town by the Caribbean, a village which he helped found. The Colonel was something of a hero to the costeños, for among other things, he refused to stay silent about the banana massacres, delivering a searing denunciation of the murders to Congress in 1929. A very complex and interesting man, the Colonel was also an excellent story teller who had lead quite an intriguing life — when he was younger he shot and killed a man in a duel, and it is said that he had fathered over sixteen children! He would speak of his wartime experiences as if they were “almost pleasant experiences — sort of youthful adventures with guns.” The old Colonel taught the young Gabriel lessons from the dictionary, took him to the circus each year, and was the first one who introduced his grandson to ice — a miracle to be found at the UFC company store. He also told his young nephew that there was no greater burden than to have killed a man, a lesson that García Márquez would later put into the mouths of his characters. His grandmother was Tranquilina Iguarán Cotes, and would be no less an influence on the young García Márquez than her husband. She was terribly filled with superstitions and folk beliefs, as were her numerous sisters, and they filled the house with stories of ghosts and premonitions, omens and portents — all of which were studiously ignored by her husband, who once said to young Gabriel, “Don’t listen to that. Those are women’s beliefs.” And yet listen he did, for his grandmother had a unique way of telling stories. No matter how fantastic or improbable her statements, she always delivered them as if they were the implacable truth. It was a deadpan style that, some thirty years later, her grandson would adopt for his greatest novel. García Márquez’s parents were more or less strangers to him for the first few years of his life, and the reason behind this is quite interesting. His mother, Luisa Santiaga Márquez Iguarán, was one of the two children born to the Colonel and his wife. A spirited girl, she unfortunately fell in love with a man named Gabriel Eligio García. Unfortunately, for García was something of an anethma to her parents. For one thing, he was a Conservative as well as la hojarasca, a derogatory term applied to the recent residents of the town, drawn by the banana trade. (La hojarasca means “dead leaf,” as in something that descends in useless flurries and is best swept away.) Garcia also had a reputation as a philanderer, the father of four illegitimate children. He was not exactly the man the Colonel had envisioned winning the heart of his daughter — and yet he did, wooing her with violin serenades, love poems, countless letters — and even telegraph messages. They tried all they could to get rid of the man, but he kept coming back, and it was obvious that their daughter was committed to him. Finally they surrendered to his Latino tenacity, and the Colonel gave her hand in marriage to the former medical student. In order to ease relations, the newlyweds settled in the Colonel’s old home town of Riohacha. (The tragicomic story of their courtship would later be adapted and recast as Love in the Time of Cholera.) Early Life Gabriel José García Márquez was born on March 6, 1928 in Aracataca, although his father contends that it was really 1927. Because his parents were still poor and struggling, his grandparents accepted the task of raising him, a common practice at the time. Unfortunately, 1928 was the last year of the banana boom in Aracataca. The strike and its brutal reprisal hit the town hard; over one hundred strikers were shot one night in Aracataca and dumped into a common grave. It was a sad start to his life, one that would later resurface in his writing. Nicknamed Gabito, little Gabriel grew up as a quiet and shy lad, entranced by his grandfather’s stories and his grandmother’s superstitions. Aside from the Colonel and himself, it was a house of women, and later García Márquez would later remark that their beliefs had him afraid to leave his chair, half terrified of ghosts. And yet all the seeds of his future work were planted in that house –stories of the civil war and the banana massacre, the courtship of his parents, the sturdy practicality of the superstitious matriarch, the comings and goings of aunts, great aunts, and his grandfather’s illegitimate daughters — later García Márquez would write: “I feel that all my writing has been about the experiences of the time I spent with my grandparents.” His grandfather died when he was eight years old, and due to his grandmother’s increasing blindness, he went to live with his parents in Sucre, where his father was working as a pharmacist. Soon after he arrived in Sucre, it was decided that he should begin his formal schooling. He was sent to a boarding school in Barranquilla, a port city at the mouth of the Magdalena River. There, he acquired a reputation as being a shy boy who wrote humorous poems and drew cartoons. So serious and non-athletic was he that he was nicknamed “the Old Man” by his classmates. In 1940, when he was twelve, he was awarded a scholarship to a secondary school for gifted students, run by Jesuits. The school — the Liceo Nacional — was in Zipaquirá, a city 30 miles to the north of Bogotá. The journey would take a week, and in that time he came to the conclusion that he did not like Bogotá. Exposed to the capital for the first time, he found it dismal and oppressive, and his experience helped confirm his identity as a costeño. In school, he found himself growing quite stimulated by his studies, and in the evening, he often read books aloud to his companions in the dormitory. And much to his amusement, even though he had yet to write anything significant, his great love of literature and his cartoons and stories helped him acquire a reputation as a writer. Perhaps this reputation provided him with a star by which to steer the ship of his imagination; and he would need it, for after graduation in 1946, the eighteen year old “writer” followed his parents’ wishes and enrolled in the Universidad Nacional in Bogotá as a law student rather than as a journalist. It was during this time that García Márquez met his future wife. While visiting his parents, he was introduced to a

13 year old girl named Mercedes Barcha Pardo. Dark and silent, of Egyptian decent, she was “the most interesting person” he had ever met. After he graduated from the Liceo Nacional, he took a small vacation with his parents before leaving for the University. During that time, he proposed to her. Agreeing, but first wishing to finish primary school, she put off the engagement. Although they wouldn’t be married for another fourteen years, Mercedes promised to stay true to him. The Hungry Years Like many great writers attending college for a subject they despised, García Márquez found that he had absolutely no interest in his studies, and he became something of a consummate slacker. He began to skip classes and neglect both his studies and himself, electing to wander around Bogotá and ride the streetcars, reading poetry instead of law. He ate in cheap cafés, smoked cigarettes, and associated with all the usual suspects — literate socialists, starving artists, and budding journalists. One day, however, his life changed — all from reading just a simple book. As if all the lines of fate suddenly converged in his hands, he was given a copy of Kafka’s The Metamorphosis, translated by none other than Jorge Luis Borges. The book had a profound effect on García Márquez; making him aware that literature did not have to follow a straight narrative and unfold a traditional plot. The effect was liberating: “I thought to myself that I didn’t know anyone was allowed to write things like that. If I had known, I would have started writing a long time ago.” He also remarked that Kafka’s “voice” had the same echoes if his grandmother’s — “. . . That’s how my grandmother used to tell stories, the wildest things with a completely natural tone of voice.” One of the first things he set out to do was “catch up” on all the literature he had been missing. He began reading voraciously, devouring everything he could get his hands on. He also began writing, and to his surprise, his first story, “The Third Resignation,” was published in 1946 by the Liberal Bogotá newspaper El Espectador, and the editor even hailed him as “the new genius of Colombian letters!” García Márquez entered a period of creativity, penning ten more stories for the newspaper over the next few years. As a humanist from a Liberal family, the 1948 assassination of Gaitán had profound effect on García Márquez, and he even participated in the rioting of el Bogotázo, having his own quarters partially burned down. The Universidad Nacional was closed, precipitating his move to the more peaceful North, where he transferred to the Universidad de Cartagena. There he half-heartedly pursued law while writing a daily column for El Universal, a Cartagena newspaper. Deciding to abandon his attempts at law in 1950, he devoted himself to writing, moving to Barranquilla. Over the next few years, he began associating with a literary circle called el grupo de Barranquilla, and under their influence he began to read the work of Hemingway, Joyce, Woolf, and most importantly, Faulkner. He also embarked on a study of the classics, finding tremendous inspiration in the Oedipus Rex cycle by Sophocles. Faulkner and Sophocles would become his two biggest influences throughout the late forties and early fifties. Faulkner amazed him with his ability to reformulate his childhood into a mythical past, inventing a town and a county in which to house his prose. In Faulkner’s mythical Yoknapatawpha, García Márquez found the seeds for Macondo; and from Sophocles’ Oedipus Rex and Antigone he found the ideas of a plot revolving around society and the abuses of power. García Márquez began to grow dissatisfied with his earlier stories, believing them to be too abstracted from his true experiences. They “were simply intellectual elaborations, nothing to do with my reality.” Faulkner taught him that a writer should write about what is close to him; and for years García Márquez had been struggling with his muse — what did he really want to say? These thoughts would find form when he returned with his mother to his grandfather’s house in Aracataca. Preparing it for sale, they found the house in quite ill repair, and yet the “haunted house” evoked such a swirl of memories in his head that he was overwhelmed. Indeed, the whole town seemed dead, frozen in time. He had already been sketching out a story based on his experiences there, a tentative novel to be called La casa, and although he felt that he was not yet ready to perfect it, he had found part of what he was after — the sense of place. Inspired by his visit, upon returning to Barranquilla he wrote his first novella, Leaf Storm. With a plot device adapted from Antigone and set in a mythical town, the book was completed in a rapid rush of energy. The town was called “Macondo,” which was the name of a banana plantation near Aracataca that he used to explore as a child. (Macondo means “banana” in the Bantu language.) Unfortunately in 1952 it was rejected by the first publisher he sent it to, and seized by self-doubt and self-criticism, he tossed it in a drawer. (In 1955, while García Márquez was in Eastern Europe, it was rescued it from its hiding place in Bogotá by his friends and sent to a publisher. This time, it was published.) Despite his rejection and his near poverty, however, he was essentially happy. Living in a brothel, he was surrounded by friends, and he had a steady job writing columns for El Heraldo. In the evening he worked on his fiction and talked with his companions over cigarettes and coffee. Then in 1953, he was seized by a sudden restlessness. Packing up and quitting his job, he set out to sell encyclopedias in La Guajira with a friend. He travelled around a bit, worked on some story ideas, and finally became formally engaged to Mercedes Barcha. In 1954, he moved back to Bogotá and accepted a job on the staff of El Espectador as a writer of stories and film reviews. There, he flirted with socialism, avoided the notice of the current dictator — Gustavo Rojas Pinilla –and pondered about his duty as a writer in the time of la violencia. In 1955, an event occurred which would place him back on the path of literature and eventually lead to his temporary exile from Colombia. That year, the Caldas, a small Colombian destroyer, was swamped in high seas on its return to Cartagena. Several sailors were swept overboard and lost, and all died except one remarkable man, Luis Alejandro Velasco, who managed to survive for ten days at sea clinging to a life raft. When he was eventually washed ashore, he quickly became a national hero. Used as propaganda by the government, Velasco did everything from make speeches to advertise watches and shoes. Finally he decided to tell the truth — the Caldas was carrying illegal cargo, and they were swept overboard by negligence and incompetence, not by a storm at all! Visiting the offices of El Espectador, Velasco offered them his story. After some hesitation, they accepted. Velasco told his story to García Márquez, who acted as a ghostwriter and recast it into his prose. The story was serialized over two full weeks as “The Truth about My Adventure,” by Luis Alejandro Velasco, and it created quite a sensation. Extremely unhappy, the Government tossed Velasco out of the Navy. Worried that Pinilla might persecute García Márquez directly, his editors sent him on assignment to Italy to cover the imminent death of Pope Pius XII. When the pontiff’s untimely survival made this assignment useless, García Márquez arranged to wander around Europe as a correspondent. After studying film for a while in Rome, he embarked on a tour of the communist bloc; and later that year his friends managed to get Leaf Storm finally published in Bogotá. García Márquez travelled through Geneva, Rome, Poland and Hungary, finally settling in Paris where he found that he was out of a job — the Pinilla government shut down the presses of El Espectador. Settling in the Latin Quarter, he lived off of credit, the kindness of his landlady, and money scraped up returning bottles for their deposits. There, influenced by the writings of Hemingway, he typed out eleven drafts of No One Writes to the Colonel and part of Este pueblo de mierda, the book that would later become In Evil Hour. After finishing Colonel, he travelled to London and finally returned to his home continent — not to Colombia, but to Venezuela, the destination of most Colombian refugees. There he finished Este pueblo de mierda, his work which most directly addresses la violencia. Even though it was obvious that he was developing his own unique voice, he was still unsatisfied. His early stories were too unemotional and abstract. Leaf Storm was too indebted to Faulkner, and No One Writes to the Colonel and In Evil Hour were too far away from his imagined goal, the picture he had been developing for years. He knew his ultimate work would take place in that mythical town of Macondo, but he had yet to find the right tone in which to tell his tale; he had yet to discover his true voice In Venezuela he teamed up with an old friend, Plinio Apuleyo Mendoza, who was now an editor with Elite, a Caracas newsweekly. Throughout the year of 1957, the two toured the communist countries of Europe, searching for an answer to Colombia’s ills, contributing articles to various Latin American publications. And while they saw something useful in socialism, García Márquez realized with a sense of depression that communism could be just as terrible as la violencia. After a brief stay in London again, García Márquez returned to Venezuela, where Mendoza was now working for Momento, and offered his old friend another job. Then, in 1958, he risked a visit back to Colombia. Keeping a low profile, he slipped into his native country and married Mercedes Bacha, who had been awaiting him in Barranquilla for four long years. He and his new bride then slipped back to Caracas, which was having its own share of problems. After publishing pieces aimed at American perfidy and the abuses of tyrants, Momento succumbed to political pressure and took an apologist pro-USA stance after Nixon’s disastrous visit in May. Angered by their paper’s capitulation, García Márquez and Mendoza resigned. Soon after leaving his position at Momento, García Márquez and his wife ended up in Havana, covering the Castro revolution. Inspired by the revolution, he helped form a Bogotá branch of Castro’s news agency, Prensa Latina, and began a friendship with Castro that has lasted until this day. In 1959 García Márquez’s first son, Rodrigo, was born, and the family moved to New York City, where he supervised the North American branch of Prensa Latina, where he labored under death threats from angry Americans and an increasing sense of disillusionment at the ideological rifts occurring in Cuba’s communist party. He resigned his position later that year and moved his family to Mexico City, travelling through the South on a Faulknerian pilgrimage; he would be denied entrance into the USA again until 1971. In Mexico City he wrote subtitles for films and worked on screenplays, and managed to publish some of his work. Rescued from moth-eaten oblivion by his friends, No One Writes to the Colonel was published in 1961, and then Big Mama’s Funeral in 1962, the same year with saw the birth of his second son, Gonzalo. Finally his friends convinced him to enter the Colombian Esso literary contest in Bogotá; he revised Este pueblo de mierda, and changed the title from “This Town of Shit” to La mala hora, or In Evil Hour. He submitted it, and it won. The sponsors of the prize sent the book to Madrid to be published, and it greeted the world in 1962 — to his immense disappointment. The publication was a travesty; the Spanish publisher purged it of all Latin American slang and objectionable material, bowdlerizing it beyond recognition and making the characters speak precise, dictionary Spanish. Heartbroken, García Márquez was forced to repudiate it — it would take nearly half a decade until the book would be published, restored to his satisfaction. The next few years were years of profound disappointment, producing nothing of much worth accept a film script cowritten with Carlos Fuentes. His friends tried to cheer him up in whatever ways they could, but nevertheless, he began to feel like a failure. None of his works had sold over 700 copies. He had never received any royalties. And still, and still, the story of Macondo eluded his grasp. Success and then it happened: his epiphany. On January 1965 he and his family were driving to the Acapulco for a vacation, when the inspiration struck him: he had found his tone. For the first time in twenty years, a stroke of lightning clearly illuminated Macondo. He would later write: “All of a sudden — I don’t know why — I had this illumination on how to write the book I had it so completely formed, that right there I could have dictated the first chapter word by word to a typist.” And later, regarding that illumination: “The tone that I eventually used in One Hundred Years of Solitude was based on the way my grandmother used to tell stories. She told things that sounded supernatural and fantastic, but she told them with complete naturalness what was most important was the expression she had on her face. She did not change her expression at all when telling her stories and everyone was surprised. In previous attempts to write, I tried to tell the story without believing in it. I discovered that what I had to do was believe in them myself and write them with the same expression with which my grandmother told them: with a brick face.” He turned the car immediately around and headed home. There, he put Mercedes in charge of the family, and he retired to his room to write. And write he did. He wrote every day for eighteen months, consuming up to six packs of cigarettes a day. To provide for the family, the car was sold, and almost every household appliance was pawned so Mercedes could feed the family and keep him supplied with a constant river of paper and cigarettes. His friends started to call his smoke-filled room “the Cave of the Mafia,” and after a while the whole community began helping out, as if they collectively understood that he was creating a masterpiece. Credit was extended, appliances loaned, debts forgiven. After nearly a year of work, García Márquez sent the first three chapters to Carlos Fuentes, who publicly declared: “I have just read eighty pages from a master.” Towards the end of the novel, as yet unnamed, anticipation grew, and the buzz of success was in the air. As finishing touches, he placed himself, his wife, and his friends in the novel, and then discovered a name on the last page: Cien años de solidad. Finally he emerged from the Cave, grasping thirteen hundred pages in his hands, exhausted and almost poisoned from nicotine, over ten thousand dollars in debt, and perhaps only a few pages shy of a mental and physical breakdown. And yet, he was happy — euphoric. In need of postage, he pawned a few more household implements and sent it off to the publisher in Buenos Aires. One Hundred Years of Solitude was published in June 1967, and within a week all 8000 copies were gone. From that point on, success was assured, and the novel sold out a new printing each week, going on to sell half a million copies within three years. It was translated into over two dozen languages, and it won four international prizes. Success had come at last. Gabriel García Márquez was 39 years old when the world learned his name. Suddenly he was beset by fame. Fan mail, awards, interviews, appearances — it was obvious that his life had changed. In 1969, the novel won the Chianchiano Prize in Italy and was named the Best Foreign Book in France. In 1970, it was published in English and was chosen as one of the best twelve books of the year in the United States. Two years later he was awarded the Rómulo Gallegos Prize and the Neustadt Prize, and in 1971, a Peruvian writer named Mario Vargas Llosa even published a book about his life and work. To counter all this exposure, García Márquez simply returned to writing. Deciding that he would write about a dictator, he moved his family to Barcelona, Spain.

Posted in Uncategorized

LIFE OF BARRACK OBAMA

LIFE OF BARRACK OBAMA

LIFE OF BARRACK OBAMA

Student’s name

Department of affiliation

Course

Instructor

Date

LIFE OF BARRACK OBAMA

Introduction

Obama was the president for 8 years

Obama had a difficult childhood

He has a supportive family

He supports his friends especially Joe Biden

Body

The childhood of Obama

The separation with his father

His basic education

His mother

Middle life and college education

His life at Punahou School

His life at Occidental College and Columbia University

His life at Harvard and Meeting Michelle

Later life

His political career

Being the president

Writing career

Family life

Conclusion

After presidency

Supporting Joe Biden and staying with family

References

Olive, D. (2010). An American Story: The Speeches of Barack Obama-A Primer. ECW Press.Darsey, J. (2009). Barack Obama and America’s journey. Southern Communication Journal, 74(1), 88-103.

Remnick, D. (2010). The bridge: The life and rise of Barack Obama. Picador.Obama, B. (2009). Barack Obama. Timeline, 9(10), 11.Maraniss, D. (2012). Barack Obama: The Story. Simon and Schuster.Brill, M. T. (2006). Barack Obama: Working to make a difference. Lerner Publications.

Posted in Uncategorized

Life of Adolf Hitler a native of Austria and born on April 20, 1889 at Braunau-am-Inn

Life of Adolf Hitler a native of Austria and born on April 20, 1889 at Braunau-am-Inn

Life of Adolf Hitler a native of Austria and born on April 20, 1889 at Braunau-am-InnAdolf Hitler was a native of Austria and born on April 20, 1889 at Braunau-am-Inn; on the Bavarian border. His father, Alois, was illegitimate, and for a time bore his mother’s name Schicklegruber By 1876 he had established his claim to the surname Hitler. Adolf never used any other name, but the name Schicklegruber was revived by political opponents in Vienna in the 1930s. Formative Years 1889-1918 After his father’s retirement from the Hapsburg customs service, Adolf Hitler spent most of his childhood in the neighborhood of Linz, the capital of Upper Austria.

Alois Hitler died in 1903, but left an adequate pension and savings to support his wife and children. Adolf received a secondary education and, although he had a poor record at school and failed to secure the usual certificate, he did not leave school until 1905 when he was 16. He then spent two idle years in Linz, where he indulged in grandiose dreams of becoming an artist while not taking any steps to prepare for earning a living. His mother was overindulgent to her willful son and even after her death in 1908, he continued to draw a small allowance with which he maintained himself for a time. His ambition was to become an art student but he failed twice to secure entry to the Academy of Fine Arts. He earned a precarious livelihood by painting postcards and advertisements and drifting from one municipal boardinghouse to another.

During this period, he led a lonely and isolated life. In these early years, Hitler showed traits that characterized his later life: inability to establish ordinary human relationships; intolerance and hatred both of the established bourgeois world and of non-German peoples, especially the Jews; a tendency to passionate, denunciatory outbursts; and a readiness to live in a world of fantasy to escape from his poverty and failure. In 1913, Hitler moved to Munich. Temporarily recalled to Austria to be examined for military service, he was rejected as unfit, too weak to bear arms. When World War I broke out he volunteered for the German army and joined the 16th Bavarian Reserve Infantry “List” Regiment. He served throughout the war, was wounded in October 1916, and gassed two years later He was still hospitalized when the war ended.

Except when hospitalized, he was continuously in the front line as a headquarters runner; his bravery in action was rewarded with the Iron Cross, second class, in December 1914, and the Iron Cross, first class (a rare decoration for a corporal), in August 1918. Hitler greeted the war with enthusiasm, as a great relief from the frustration and aimlessness of his civilian life. He found comradeship, discipline, and participation in conflict intensely satisfying; and was confirmed in his belief in authoritarianism, inequity, and the heroic virtues of war. Years of Struggle 1919-1924 Discharged from the hospital in the atmosphere of confusion that followed the German defeat, Hitler determined to take up political work in order to destroy a peace settlement which he denounced as intolerable. He remained on the roster of his regiment until April 1920, and, as an army political agent, joined the tiny German Workers’ Party in Munich in September 1919.

In 1920 he was put in charge of the party’s propaganda and left the army to devote his time to building up the party, newly renamed the National Socialistiche Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (of which Nazi was an abbreviation). Conditions were ripe for the development of such a party. Resentment toward the victorious powers and economic chaos brought general discontent. This was sharpened in Bavaria, where Hitler lived throughout the 1920s, by traditional separatism and dislike of the republican, government in Berlin. In March 1920 a coup d’etat by the army established a strong right wing government. Munich became the gathering place for dissatisfied exservicemen, political plotters against the republic, and members of the Freikorps. (The Freikorps was organized in 1918-1919 from units of the German army unwilling to return to civilian life.) Many of these individuals joined the Nazi party. Foremost among them was Ernest Robin, a member of the staff of the district army command. He had actually joined the German Worker’s party before Hitler, and was of great help in furthering

Hitler’s schemes for developing it into an instrument of power. It was he who recruited the “strong arm” squads used by Hitler to protect party meetings, to attack Socialists and Communists, and to exploit violence for the impression of strength it gave. In 1921 these were formally organized under Rohm into a private party army, the SA (Sturmabteilung). Rohm also was able to ensure the protection of the Bavarian government, which depended on the local army command for the maintenance of order and which tacitly accepted his breaches of law and his policy of intimidation. Although conditions were favorable for the party’s growth, only Hitler was sufficiently astute to take full advantage of them.

When he joined the party he found it small, ineffective, committed to a program of nationalists and socialist principles, but uncertain of its arms and divided in its leadership. He accepted its program, but regarded it only as a means to an end: political power His propaganda methods and his personal arrogance caused friction with other party members, resolved when Hitler countered their attempts to curb his freedom by offering his resignation. Aware that the future of the party depended on his power to organize publicity and to acquire funds, they were forced to give in. In July 1921 he became president of the party with unlimited power From the first, Hitler set out to create a mass movement whose mystique and force would be sufficient to bind its members in loyalty to him. He engaged in unrelenting propaganda through the party newspaper, the Volkischer Brobachter.

Through a succession of meetings, rapidly growing from audiences of a handful to audiences of thousands, he exercised his magnetism and developed his unique talent for mass leadership. At the same time, he gathered around him several of the Nazi leaders who later became infamous: Alfred Rosenberg, Rudolf Hess, Hermann Goring, and Julius Streicher. The climax in this rapid growth of the Nazi party in Bavaria came in an attempt to seize power in the November 1923 putsch. Hitler and General Eric Ludendorff took advantage of the prevailing lawlessness and opposition to the Weimar Republic to force leaders of the local government and the local Reichswehr commander to proclaim a national revolution. Hitler’s putsch, however, was defeated.

When placed on trial for his attempted overthrow of the government, Hitler, although his part in the putsch had been far from glorious, characteristically took advantage of the immense publicity afforded to him. He also drew a vital lesson from the putsch: that the movement must achieve power by legal means. He was sentenced to prison for five years, but served only nine months, and that in comfort at Landsberg Prison. He used that time to prepare the first volume of Mein Kampf. Hitler’s ideas can be traced to other writings and radical political movements prevalent in Vienna while he lived there. He regarded inequality between races and individuals as part of an unchangeable natural order and exalted the “Aryan race as the sole creative element of mankind. The natural unit of mankind was the volk, of which the German was the greatest; and the state only existed to serve the volk: a mission that the Weimar Republic betrayed. All morality and truth was judged by this criterion: whether it was in accordance with the interest and preservation of the volk. The unity of the volk found its incarnation in the Fuhrer, endowed with absolute authority Below the Fuhrer came the party which was drawn from the best elements of’ the volk and was, in turn, its safeguard.

In Hitler’s view, the greatest enemy of Nazism was not liberal democracy which was already on the verge of collapse, but rather Marxism with its insistence on internationalism and class conflict. Behind Marxism, Hitler saw the greatest enemy of all, the Jew, who he saw as the very incarnation of evil, a mythical figure into which he projected all that he feared and hated. Hitler believed that the Germans were “racially superior” and that there was a struggle between them and the “inferior races.” He saw Jews, Roma (Gypsies), and the handicapped as a serious biological threat to the purity of the German (Aryan) Race, what he called the “master race.” Hitler and the Nazis blamed the Jews for Germany’s defeat in World War I, for its economic problems, and for the spread of Communist parties throughout Europe. Will to Power 1924 While Hitler was in prison, the Nazi party disintegrated through internal dissension. In the task of reconstruction after his release, Hitler faced difficulties that had not existed before 1923. Economic stability had been achieved by currency reform and the Dawes Plan which enabled the Weimar Republic to become more respectable.

Hitler was forbidden from making speeches until late 1927. Nevertheless, the party grew slowly in numbers, and in February 1926 Hitler successfully established his position against Gregor Strasser, who had built up a rival Nazi movement in north Germany. The economic slump of 1929 opened a new period of both economic and political instability. Hitler made an alliance with the Nationalist Alfred Hugenberg in a campaign against the Young Plan. Through it, Hitler was able, for the first time, to reach a nationwide audience with the help of Hugenbergs’ Nationalist party organization and the newspapers it controlled. It also enabled him to position himself as a gifted agitator to the industrial/business magnets who controlled political funds. He was anxious to use them to establish a strong right wing, antiworking class government.

The subsidies Hitler received from big business placed his party on a secure financial footprecedented mass following he took part in a series of intrigues for the support of the aging president, in which the other principal participants were Franz Von Papuan, General Kurt von Schleicher, Otto Meissner, and Oskar Hindenburg. In spite of a decline in the party’s votes in November 1932, he held to the Chancellorship as the only of lice he would accept, and this by constitutional, not revolutionary methods. Throughout, he showed a unique ability to exploit conditions favorable to his success. Thus was created the Hitler myth. He propagated it by every device of mass agitation and with an actor’s ability to become absorbed in the role which he created for himself Yet, he remained a shrewd and calculating politician, aware of the weakness of his own position, perceiving more quickly than anyone else how a situation could best be turned to his own advantage. In January 1933, he reaped his reward when Hidenburg invited him to take the Chancellorship and he took office with the support of Papen and Hugenberg. Hitler’s personal life grew more relaxed and stable with the added comfort that accompanied the party’s success. Alter his release from prison, he went to live on the Obersalzberg, near Berchtesgarden. His income at the time was derived in a haphazard manner from party funds and from writings in Nationalist newspapers. When he became Chancellor, he accepted the material comforts that followed, but remained independent of them. He was indifferent to clothes and food, never smoking or drinking tea, coffee, or alcohol.

He continued, even as Fuhrer, to rebel against routine or regular work, a characteristic which he ascribed to his artistic temperament. When he went to live at Bercbtesgarden, his half sister, Angela Raubal, and her two daughter’s accompanied him. Hitler became devoted to one of them, but his possessive jealousy drove her to suicide in September 1931. For weeks Hitler was inconsolable. In later years, Eva Braun, a shop assistant from Munich, became his mistress. Hitler rarely allowed her to come to Berlin or appear in public with him and would not consider marriage on the grounds that it would hamper his career. Eva was a warm hearted girl with no intellectual ability. Her great virtue in Hitler’s eyes was her unquestionable loyalty, and in recognition of this he made her his legal wife at the end of his life. Revolution and The New Order Once in power, Hitler proceeded to establish an absolute dictatorship.

He secured the President’s assent for new elections on the grounds that a majority in the Reichstag could not, after all, be obtained. The Reichstag fire, on February 27, 1933, provided an excuse for a decree overriding all guarantees of freedom and the subsequent intensified campaign of violence. In these conditions, the Nazis polled 43.9% of the votes. In March, the Reichstag assembled in the Potsdam Garrison church, a theatrical gathering designed by Hitler to show the unity of his own movement with the old conservative Germany, represented by Hidenburg. Two days later, an enabling bill giving full powers to Hitler was passed in the Reichstag by the combined votes of Nazi, Nationalist, and Centre party deputies. Thus far successful, Hitler had no desire to carry a radical revolution too far. Conciliation was still necessary if he were to succeed to the presidency and retain the support of the army and industrialists. Ernst Rohm was the chief protagonist of the “continuing revolution.”

He was, also, head of the SA, an organization that was greatly distrusted by the army. Hitler tried first to secure Rohm’s support for his policies by persuasion and by giving him a government office but failed to win him over Goring and Hornet Hammer were eager to remove Rohm, but Hitler hesitated until the last moment. Finally, on June 29, 1934, he reached his decision and ordered the “Night of the Long Knives.” Rohm and his lieutenant, Edmund Heines, were executed without trial, together with Gregor Strasser, Schleicher, and a variety of others. The army leaders, satisfied at seeing the SA broken up, approved Hitler’s actions. When Hidenburg died on August 2, they, together with Papen, assented to the merging of the Chancellorship and the Presidency. With this went the supreme command of the Reich’s armed forces, requiring that officers and men to take an oath of allegiance to Hitler personally. Economic recovery and reduction in unemployment made the regime more acceptable.

A combination or tyranny and success brought the support of 90% of the voters in a plebiscite. Once in power, Hitler devoted little attention to the organization and running of the domestic affairs of the Nazi state. Responsible for the broad lines of policy, as well as for the system of terror which upheld the state, he left detailed administration to his subordinates. Each of these exercised arbitrary power in his own sphere, but by deliberately creating offices and organizations with overlapping authority, Hitler prevented any one of these private empires from ever becoming sufficiently strong to challenge his own absolute authority. Em Volk, Em Reich Foreign policy claimed Hitler’s greater interest. His objectives were laid down in Mein Kampf and Hitler worked toward them with consummate skill. He had earlyon admired the pan-Germanism of the Austrian George von Schmerer. The reunion of the German people was his first ambition. Beyond that, the natural field of expansion lay eastward, in Poland, the Ukraine, and Russia. Such expansion would involve renewal of Germany’s historic conflict with the Slavic peoples, who would be subordinate in the new order to the Teutonic master race.

Hitler regarded Fascist Italy as a natural ally in this crusade against Bolshevism, provided their rivalry in central Europe could be overcome. Britain was a possible ally provided it abandoned its traditional policy of maintaining the balance of power in Europe and limited itself to its interests overseas. France alone in the west was the natural enemy of Germany, and must, therefore, be subdued to make expansion eastward possible. Before such expansion took place, it was necessary to remove restrictions placed on Germany by the Versailles Treaty. Hitler used all the arts of propaganda to allay the suspicions of the other nations. He posed as the champion of Europe, standing against the scourge of Bolshevism. He insisted that he was a man of peace who wished only to remove the inequalities of Versailles. Germany withdrew from the Geneva Disarmament Conference and from the League of Nations in October1933, but Hitler hastened to sign a nonaggression treaty with Poland in January 1934. Every repudiation of Versailles was followed by an offer to negotiate a fresh agreement and insistence on the limited nature of Germany’s ambitions. Only once did he overreach himself: when the Austrian Nazis murdered Chancellor Dollfuss of Austria and attempted a coup d’etat in July 1934.

The attempt failed, and as Mussolini moved troops to the frontier, Hitler disclaimed all responsibility and sacrificed those who had acted with his sanction. In January 1934, a plebiscite in the Saarland returned that territory to Germany, and Hitler took the opportunity to renounce any further claims on France. In March, he announced the introduction of conscription, and despite opposition, he eventually negotiated a naval treaty in June 1935 with Britain. His greatest stroke came in March 1936, when he used the excuse of a pact between France and the Soviet Union to remilitarize the Rhineland. This was a decision Hitler made against the advice of his own general staff. In October 1936, the Rome-Berlin axis was established. Shortly afterward came an Anti-Cominterm Pact with Japan. In November 1937, Hitler outlined his plans of future conquest to a secret meeting of his military leaders.

At that point, Hitler dispensed with the services of those who were not wholehearted in their acceptance of Nazi dynamism: Hjalmar Schacht, who declared Germany’s further rearmament a danger to its economy; Werner von Blomberg and Werner von Fritsch, representative of the caution of professional soldiers; and Konstantin von Neurath, Hidenburg’s appointment at the foreign office. In February 1938, Hitler invited the Austrian chancellor, Kurt von Schuschnigg, to Bertesgarden and forced him to sign an agreement giving the Austrian Nazis a virtual free hand. When Schuschnigg attempted to repudiate the agreement and announced a plebiscite on the question of an Anchluss with Germany, Hitler immediately ordered the occupation of Austria by German troops. The enthusiastic response by which Hitler was received by the Austrians made him decide to annex that nation. He returned in triumph to Vienna, the scene of his youthful humiliations and hardships. No resistance was encountered from Britain and France. Hitler had taken special care to secure the support of Italy and proclaimed his undying gratitude to Mussolini. Having given assurances that the Anchluss would not affect Germany’s relations with Czechoslovakia, Hitler proceeded at once with his plans against that country. Konrad Henlein, leader of the German minority in Czechoslovakia, was instructed to agitate for impossible demands for the Sudetenland Germans, thereby enabling Hitler to justify the annexation of Czechoslovakia.

The willingness of Britain and France to compel the Czechoslovakian government to cede the Sudentenland areas to Germany presented Hitler with the choice between substantial gains by peaceful agreement and even greater acquisitions by a spectacular war. Mussolini’s intervention caused Hitler to accept the Munich agreement on September 30, 1938. Hitler felt resentment immediately afterward for being cheated out of an impressive military conquest. It was to be expected then, that Hitler would waste no time in provoking an occasion for occupying the whole of Czechoslovakia. This he did by fostering Slovak discontent. On March 16, 1939, he proclaimed the dissolution of the state whose existence he, as an Austrian, had always regarded as unnatural. Immediately afterward, the Lithuanian government was forced to cede Memel, on the northern frontier of East Prussia, to Germany.

March to Total War Hitler was now ready to advance toward the ultimate objective of lebensraum in the east. Confronted by an uncompromising Poland, guaranteed by Britain and France, Hitler strengthened the alliance with Italy (Pact of Steel – May 1939) and negotiated a nonaggression pact with the Soviet Union. Signed on August 23, this opened the door for Hitler to attack Poland on September 1, 1939. While he disclaimed any quarrel with Britain, the Polish invasion was quickly followed by a British and French declaration of war Hitler pursued unwaveringly the objectives of his foreign policy as he had laid them down in Mein Kampf He showed astonishing skill in judging the mood of the European democracies and exploiting their weakness. Up to this point every move had been successful; even his anxiety over British and French entry into the war was dispelled by the rapid success of the war with Poland. The result was to convince him more and more of his infallibility and to induce him to push ahead with his plans for conquest. From the start, Hitler had assumed direction of the major strategy of the war.

When the success of the campaign in Poland failed to lead to peace negotiations, Britain and France declared war, so Hitler began to plan for an offensive in the west. Hitler occupied Denmark and Norway in April 1940. He then struck against France, invading through the Ardennes rather than through the Low Countries. Against his general’s advice, Hitler held back Guderian’s tanks, enabling the British to escape from Dunkirk. The campaign as a whole was a brilliant success and Hitler could claim the major credit for its overall planning. On June 10, Mussolini entered the war on the side of Germany, and at the end of June, Hitler avenged the Treaty of Versailles by signing an armistice with France at the site of the 1918 Armistice. The next stop was the subjugation of Britain by aerial bombardment, followed by invasion. Yet, as the expected surrender of Britain failed to materialize, the invasion of the Soviet Union quickly came to dominate Hitler’s conception of the war’s grand strategy. The Soviet Union had occupied eastern Poland and Bessarabia as part of the nonaggression pact, yet Hitler sought to counter any further Soviet moves by forcing Hungary and Rumania into an alliance. Meanwhile, Mussolini invaded Greece, and the lack of success of the Italian armies made it necessary for German forces to come to their aid in the Balkans and North Africa. Hitler’s plans were further disrupted by a coup d’etat in Yugo slavia in March 1941, overthrowing the govern ment which had made an agreement with Ger many. Regarding this as an insult to Germany and himself, Hitler immediately ordered his armies to subdue Yugoslavia. The campaigns in the Mediterranean the ater, although successful, remained subordinate to the Russian offensive, with which Hitler was so preoccupied that he lost the opportunism and flexibility which he had shown in political af fairs. Even when Admiral Rueder and Field Marshall Erwin Rommel urged Hitler to destroy the whole British middle eastern position by a final blow at the Suez, he refused to transfer forces from Operation Barbarossa.

Unachieved Empire When the attack against the USSR was launched on June 22, 1941, Hitler was so confident of success that he refused to provide winter clothing and equipment for his troops. The German army advanced swiftly into the Soviet Union but failed to destroy its Russian opponent. Hitler became completely overbearing with his generals. He disagreed with them about the object of the main attack and he wasted time and strength by frequently reversing his own decisions and failing to concentrate on a single objective. In December 1941, an unexpected Russian counterattack made it clear that Hitler’s hopes of a single campaign would not be realized. The next day came the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. Hitler precipitously declared war on the United States, even though the pact with Japan was purely defensive and he had not been informed of the Japanese intentions. Misled by an essentially central European view of world politics, he apparently took little account of the force which a mobilized United States could bring to bear in Europe. Hitler’s conduct throughout 1942 was marked by further errors of judgement. He paid insufficient attention to the Mediterranean and the Atlantic at a time when a relatively small additional effort in those theaters might have been decisive. In Russia, his continued unreadiness to concentrate on a single objective probably forfeited the opportunity to capture Stalingrad while it was still relatively undefended.

Meanwhile, he directed Himmler to prepare the ground for the “new order” in Europe. The concentration camps were expanded and added to them were extermination camps such as Auschwitz and mobile extermination squads. The Jews of Germany, Poland, and Russia were the most numerous victims: in German occupied Europe, more than 6,000,000 were killed by the end of the war. This campaign of mass murder was the only solution, in Hitler’s view, to “the Jewish problem.” The sufferings of other races were only less when measured in numbers killed. Such barbarism was indiscriminate, even where, as in the Ukraine, Hitler might have encouraged nationalist feelings to his own advantage, At the end of 1942, defeat at El Alaimein followed by Stalingrad in early 1943, brought the war’s turning point and a distinct change in Hitler’s character. Hitherto the success which he had imagined had been largely realized, but to preserve the world of fantasy from defeat and failure he isolated himself more and more from reality. Directing operations from his headquarters in the east, he refused to visit bombed cities or to read reports of setbacks. Those close to him especially his secretary Martin Bormann, took care that only pleasing information reached him. Hitler also became increasingly dependent on his physician, Theodor Morell, and the injections which he supplied. Even so, he had not lost the power to react vigorously in face of misfortune.

After the arrest of Mussolini in July 1943 and the Italian armistice, he not only directed the occupation of all important positions held by the Italian army but he also ordered the kidnapping of Mussolini with the intention that he should head a new Fascist government. On the eastern front, however, the refusal to withdraw only led to greater losses without any possibility of stopping the Soviet advance. Inevitably, relations with his army commanders grew more strained, especially with Hitler’s growing reliance on SS divisions which were directly responsible to him. Meanwhile the failure of the U-Boat campaign and the bombing of Germany made it more evident that defeat was on the horizon. All these factors, coupled with the successful Allied invasion of France, drove into action the desperate few soldiers and civilians who were ready to remove Hitler and negotiate a peace. Several attempts were planned in 1943 and 1944. The closest to being successful was made on July 20, 1944, when Colonel Graf Claus von Stauffenberg exploded a bomb at a conference at Hitler’s headquarters in East Prussia. Hitler escaped with superficial injuries, and had executed, with few exceptions, all those implicated in the plot. The destruction of the army’s independence was now complete, and Nazi political officers were appointed to all military headquarters. Thereafter, Hitler was increasingly ill and fatigued, but he did not relax or lose control over the Nazi party or the armed forces. Hitler continued to exercise an almost hypnotic power over his close subordinates, none of whom were able to wield any independent authority.

In December 1944, he moved his headquarters to the west to direct an offensive in the Ardennes for which the last reserves of manpower were mobilized. When it failed, his hopes for victory became even more visionary, based on the use of new weapons or the breakup of the grand alliance, especially after the death of Roosevelt. He ordered mass material destruction and condemned his armies to death by refusing to allow surrender. Beginning in January 1945, Hitler never left the chancellory in Berlin or its bunker, abandoning a plan to lead a final resistance in the south as the Russians closed in on Berlin. In a state of extreme nervous exhaustion, prematurely senile if not insane, he at last accepted the inevitability. He then prepared to take his own life, leaving to its fate the country over which he had taken absolute command. Before this transpired, two further acts remained. On April 29, 1945, he married Eva Braun.

Immediately afterward he dictated his political testament, justifying his career and appointing Karl Donitz as head of state and Josef Goebbels as Chancellor. On April 30, he said farewell to his few remaining followers, then retired to his suite and shot himself while Eva took poison. In accordance with his instructions their bodies were burned. Hitler’s success must be attributed to the conditions of post World War I Germany and to his own unique talents as a political leader. His rise to power was not inevitable and any changes in circumstances might have relegated him to the obscurity and failure of his youth; yet there was no one who equaled his ability to exploit and shape events to his own ends. The power which was wielded was unprecedented, both in its scope and in the technical resources at its command; but he made no permanent contribution, moral or material, to mankind. His originality and distinctiveness lay in his methods rather than his ideas and purpose. By the time he was defeated, he had broken down the whole structure of the world in which he lived, destroyed millions of people, and inaugurated a new era with even greater potentialities of power and destruction.

Posted in Uncategorized

Life Lessons

Life Lessons

Life Lessons

Jane has been my friend since childhood. I have known her for as long as I can remember. We went to school together, played together, had sleepovers at each other’s houses. There was never any question that she would always be a part of my life. Nothing could come between us. I believed that we had a healthy friendship because we gave each other space but managed to keep our friendship quite strong. We went to different high schools but remained in the same area, so we would hang out frequently. As we grew up, we shared our triumphs and joys. When I felt sad, I would talk to her about whatever was bothering me. She became more than a friend; she was my family. However, something happened that would change our friendship forever.

One weekend just after I joined college, I asked Jane if she would go out to dinner with me. I had not seen her for a while, and I wanted to talk to her about some challenges I was experiencing while transitioning to college life. I knew I could rely on her for honest and sound advice. She told me that she was feeling rather ill so she would not make it. I wished her a quick recovery and told her I hoped we could hang out soon. However, soon after this, I began to notice that something was amiss. Jane stopped taking my calls and took days to respond to my texts. I was quite hurt as this was unlike her, I tried to ask her what the issue was, but she was not forthcoming. It broke my heart to imagine that our friendship was coming to an end, and I had no idea why.

I decided to give Jane some space to work out any issues she might have. I wrote her a text saying that I would be available to talk whenever she was ready. Still, she did not respond to this. After a few weeks, I grew quite concerned and decided to visit Jane’s house where she lived with her parents. I had been there before, but I did not find Jane at home and decided not to pry further. On this particular day, I found Jane’s mother making lunch, and she invited me to join her. Tactfully, I explained what had been going on between Jane and I. Jane’s mother was quite sympathetic and told me that Jane had been going through a hard time.

A few days before, Jane had checked herself into a mental health facility as she had been struggling with a diagnosed mental illness for a few months. I was alarmed, but her mother told me that she was doing well. Jane did not want to burden me with her illness as she was quite unwell, but she wanted to get better before telling me all about it. She knew that I was in a new chapter of my life in college and wanted to give me time to enjoy myself.

I was both relieved and saddened to learn about this. My best friend did not give me the chance to be there for her during a tough moment, and I felt that I had failed her. On the other hand, I was glad that she had taken the proper steps towards recovery. I learned an important lesson from this experience. As humans, we all go through different phases in life that some of our closest friends and family might not identify with. When this happens, we must walk the difficult paths alone and find a solution to our problems. I also learned the importance of giving our loved ones the space that they need to figure out their lives. When Jane felt better, she called me to explain, and I believe that our friendship is stronger than ever.

Posted in Uncategorized

Life Is Valuable To Me, Like Life Is A Race…

Life Is Valuable To Me, Like Life Is A Race…

Life Is Valuable To Me, Like Life Is A Race…

The term life to me has many meanings, but one thing that becomes apparent every time I think about the matter is that life has too much value and that we have to live life as best as we can so as to rip the best things it has to offer us before we run out of time. Life is fast, and unless one values it and lives as if it were valuable, there is a big chance that one can lose out. This paper, therefore, is my story of how I perceive life. Life to me is like a race; a fast race that you either win or lose. To me life has a lot of value and this value has to be utilized to the minimum. The story below will show how I discovered that life is valuable, and how I became to perceive life like a race.

In my younger days, before I developed into the person I am today, I was a troublesome child; hardheaded and set on my ways without the hope of ever listening or considering the views of others. Before all changed, I attended and became a constant member of one of the most common schools on earth; a school that everyone has attended at least once in their lifetime. This school takes in everyone no matter what state, stage or position in life they are in; these things do not matter to this school, and I am sure everyone has gone to the school once. The school am talking about here is the extremely common school in life called the School of Hard Knocks. Up to date I have not come across a more effective, memorable and efficient school in life.

Since I was hard headed, stubborn and set on my ways in more than one way, it is only fair to admit that I got quite a share of this School of Hard Knocks education. I remember listening to a youth counselor in one of the many youth camps I attended. He was talking about how the fastest runner in a race does not always have to reach the finish line before the other runners who might even have started the race at a lesser speed. This seemed like something that had been taken out of the bible as I had attended some bible classes in my days and I was sure there was a verse a verse in the bible that had the same ideology of life.

Little did I know that I would later live the exact experience the youth counselor at summer camp was explaining? At the same camp, we constantly held summer competitions that involved various games such as racing, football, and other kinds of sports. One of the competitions that were being held at that time was a racing competition. I was considered an extremely excellent runner in most of the camps that I had attended, and I was sure that, in this particular camp, I was by far the fastest runner. I was sure would outrun everyone else in this particular race.

The race soon began and as I had thought I was outrunning everyone else and I was way ahead of them in a few seconds, but there was a problem. In the previous three months, I had dislocated my foot ankle, and though it had healed well, I started feeling some discomfort in my bad ankle. The doctor had warned that I should not strain the leg for a number of months, but I assumed that the leg had healed in the three months I had been idle. However, this was not the case, the discomfort increased, and I could not walk or run properly. I started to limp badly, and in no time, the other racers had outrun me and they were way ahead of me. However, I was glad that it was not that serious as no one stopped to see what was going on.

I was able to complete the competition, only, I finished it last. I had anticipated that I would finish first and take home the crown. Someone else, however, won and got to take the coveted price home. I was so sad that someone had taken away something I had wanted so bad, and by the fact that I would not enjoy to watch my parents as they beamed with pride when I showed them the trophy. However, I was glad that my little brother had won more than 10 trophies in math contests. I saw it as a way life evened out my defeat. I am extremely proud and happy to have such a talented brother, and I was glad that his trophies were around to hide the fact that I had not brought home any trophies.

I learned a number of lessons from this experience. For example, I learned that an individual’s talents, abilities and capabilities only count for a small percentage of the successes such an individual achieves later in life. Another lesson I learned is that life can be understood or taken as a race. A race, therefore, can be a good example of how life is. Take, for example, the fact that in a race there are no guaranteed wins. Life is just the same. One can be sure that they have all abilities and resources to achieve certain goals, but at the end, they can fail to achieve the same goals just like a racer can fail to win. It was clear from my experience that there are no guarantees that an individual will always emerge at the top even if they have the capacity to achieve this. It was during this juncture that I remembered my counselor’s words about the fastest winner not always obtaining the trophy, and I realized that his words were true.

There, I was the fastest runner in the camp expecting to emerge the winner; something that was disapproved at the end. Back to life, we can make the same conclusions as in a race. The wise sometimes go without food, and the skillful, in life, are not always the ones driving the biggest cars. Additionally, the most educated people are not always the richest, or the successful individuals in life. It would be fair to conclude that the outcomes of life, just like those of a race are influenced by several variables, and not just by abilities or skills. For example, ones success can be determined by chance, by one being at the right place and being at there at the right time. These variables that determine success not only apply to track racers but also to the skillful, the educated, the wise, strong and the wealthy.

This, however, does not mean that being wealthy, skillful, educated, wise, strong, or having special abilities is wrong. It is quite clear from some examples that good education, or the appropriate skills can contribute to one leading a successful life. Take Bill Gates, for example, his skills, education, wisdom and hard work have made him one of the most successful and wealthiest men worldwide. However, it is essential to realize that, especially after the example with my experience, that there are no guarantees that something is going to go the way one sees it. This means that one’s success is mainly determined by other forces and not just his attributes.

I changed a lot after some of the experiences I got from the school of hard knocks. I spend less time being stubborn and rude, and, as a result, I spend less time in this hardship school.

I realized that some situations can go either way; I could win in some cases or at other times, I could lose. After learning this, I became more comfortable with life, and I realized that I did not always have to win for me to be happy and content. I learned that I should take and value each situation the same; both winning and losing. I later learned that I should never take my winning or losing at face value and that I should consider the overall worth of each situation. For example, if I lost it did not mean all was lost. I could have lost and let someone else win who needed the win much more than I did.

With the exception of some of these bad experiences I had at the school of hard knocks, I had a wonderful time at most of these camps, and I sometimes think that my loosing at that particular race was essential and extremely beneficial for my life. The reason I say this is that, without these experiences, I would not have learned the valuable lessons I learned after I lost that race. Later I discovered that some of the finest teachings are those that we win and never receive a trophy. The experiences life teaches us are prices worth more than other prizes received as trophies. This is because it is not only kind of trophy that helps us learn through valuable lessons and help us mature and grow up into adults who are productive.

Conclusion

As it was indicated in the above story, a race can be exemplified to life. The reason I conclude this way is because in most cases the two have the same goals, and one of them is to emerge successful at the end of hard work. Races can be used as metaphors for life because they impose on individuals the same lessons life imposes on them. For example, one can learn from races and life that winning or becoming successful is not a guarantee, and that at times people lose and other times they win. It was learned from the above story that people should value the outcomes of their just the same.

Posted in Uncategorized

Life Is The Most Precious Gift We Have As Human Beings, Deathography

Life Is The Most Precious Gift We Have As Human Beings, Deathography

Life Is The Most Precious Gift We Have As Human Beings, Deathography

Introduction

Life is the most precious gift we have as human beings; it is through the life that we poses that we get to experience all the wonders of the world. Life is also full of hardships in that everyone is prone to be faced with some sort of challenges that vary in one way or another. Life occurs in different stages which are determined by the biological structure of our bodies. Life begins when a sperm fertilizes a female egg in the ovary; this is followed with the birth of a human being. When a human being is born, they are armed with are with an immune system that helps defend the body when it comes under threat. All human beings are thus faced with the fact that they will die one day. Despite the fact that as human beings, we do not have the quality of immortality, we are tasked with the duty of preserving our human race through the maintenance of our health (Boerre, 2006).

Death can be caused by many factors some of which have proved to be inevitable. Human beings are thus at the mercy or fate of the superior being they believe in terms of protection. Human beings can also prolong their life through the maintenance of a healthy lifestyle which in turn has been known to improve the sustainability of the bodies. The loss of a loved one is one of the hardest experienced to deal with. One does not have to experience loss to feel the pain a person undergoing grief is going through. This is brought about by the quality we have as human beings that makes us vulnerable to our emotions (Family Education Network, 2010).

This research paper focuses on the deathograghy of my grandfather. It looks at the ways in which the death of my grandfather affected me as a child. It father looks at the ways in which human beings deal with death in terms of ours vulnerability to the factor.

The experienced of the loss of a loved one is a stage that we all have to go through as human beings. This involves dealing with the fact that humans cannot resurrect from death and can only be missed by their loved ones. There are many causes of death as stated earlier. The cause of a person’s death influences the way in which human beings approaches grieving. If a loved one dies a sudden and an unexpected death, the family and friends have a harder time dealing with their death in that they were not emotionally prepared for the loss of the individual. If a person has undergone a lifetime of suffering due to the condition that they were faced with, the family and friends may have an easier time adapting to the possibility of their death.

Another factor that influences the reaction to the death of a loved one is the age of the diseased. If a person loses their life at a young age, it is hard for the friends and family to cope with the loss due to the question of what could have become of the individual if they were to live a full life. If a person loses their life at an older age, they leave their relatives with memories that can be in form of a legacy which cushions the pain. Despite these factors, dealing with the loss of a loved one is never easy. Human beings have feelings which on many occasions are uncontrollable. One thus has to be given time to grieve so that they can move to the next stage which is the acceptance of death (Orbach, Gross, Glaubman, 2006).

The experience of the death of a loved one at a young age affects the way we view life in terms of positivity or negativity. As children, we are brought up in a world where our parents protect us from the evils of the world. This protection can only go on for a period of time in that there comes a time in our life where we have to face the reality. I was only seven years when I lost my grandfather. This occurred several years ago but the memories are still fresh in my mind. My grandfather was a big part of my life. My parents ensured that we had a personal relationship at a young age. The relationship between a grandparent and a grandchild is different from the relationship between a parent and a child. Parents always nag their children to give them grandchildren so that they can spoil them silly. This is one of the perks of being a senior member of the society. My grandfather and I were inseparable, his main aim was to teach me all the lessons he taught my father as a child. Our connection was thus important for my growth and development. These memories that I carry of him have influenced the way I approach certain situations to date (MedicineNet.Com, 2004).

Personal experience (deathology) of the loss of my grandfather

My grandfather was just like any regular elderly person. He was full of wisdom and was always slow but sure of the things he spoke about. My grandfather had also been battling with conditions that were caused as result of the old age. These conditions ranged from the inability of his cognitive ability to compute various facts at a faster pace. He was also prone to being attacked by high blood pressure and arthritis which affected the immune system of his body. Before his death, my grandfather had shown signs of a potential heart attack due to his weak state. The experience of his suffering made me aware that there was something wrong that I could not get around to. I thus developed some sort of fear in preparation of worse circumstances that were to follow. This shows that young people can detect when there is a problem in a household.

One day after I had taken a visit to my grandfather’s house, I carried out my daily activities that I took on with him. When it was time to go back home with my parents, I said goodbye. This goodbye was however different from the others in that it was long in nature. It may have been a symbol that I should maximize on the little time I had left with him. The look in his eyes indicated that he was going to miss me before I had left his house. When I reached home, I went to bed and work up with my parents standing next to my bed. This time they were not filled with the usual happy faces they woke me up with in the morning. At this point, I could tell that something was wrong compared to the previous times he fell sick. My parents thus changed their tone and told me to sit down. This was shocking due to the fact that I was already sitting down. My dad then started telling me a story on how sometimes people live their homes to go to a better place. I then cut his story short by demanding to know what was really wrong. They then told me that my beloved grandfather had passed away five hours after I had left his house. I immediately went into a state of shock that was accompanied with a lot of screaming seeing that I was a child. I was not familiar with the concept of death at this age, what made me react this way was the fact that I knew that he was not coming back again. This was made possible by the story my father told me about my grandfather going to heaven.

Research shows that there are various stages of reaction to the death of a loved one. The first stage is denial where we go into a state that makes us think what is happening is not real or just a dream (Koocher, 2002). I then told myself that everything was going to be okay, this was accompanied with the thoughts I had of meeting him the next time I go to visit.

The second stage one goes through after the loss of a loved one is the grief stage. This involves dealing with the situation by recognizing that a loved one will not be coming back. This is accompanied by the shedding of tears due to the intensity of the pain that a mourner has. The time it takes for a person to grieve varies with the person, the cause of death, the age of the diseased and lastly the support of the friends and family of an individual (Hois, 2001). When I realized that my grandfather was really gone, I cried for about a week remembering all the precious time we spent together. This was a very difficult time for me due to the fact that I was a child who was used to getting what I wanted. Learning that I could not get everything I wanted was a new experience for me in that I knew that I would have to face other challenges in life. Another factor that I dealt with was the realization that my parents and siblings were not going to be around forever as I had imagined. This opened doors for a new source of fear which I later termed the fear of the unexpected (Sengendo & Nambi, 2001).

The last stage in dealing with the loss of a loved one is the acceptance of the death. This involves accepting the reality of the situation at hand. It also involves a deeper appreciation of the loved one and the value they brought to your life. This also involves moving forward as a human being and looking forward to the positive things life brings (Souza & Klein, 2001). I took two weeks to accept that my grandfather was gone forever. This acceptance was not complete in that I would occasionally breakdown when I remembered him. Accepting the death of my grandfather also meant that I had become a more mature person despite being only seven yours old. I could thus approach the difficult situations in life with more maturity due to the hard time I had gone through.

The loss of a loved one affects the immediate friends and family for the worst or on some occasions the better. Some children have been known to blame themselves for a death of a loved one in that they are suspicious at a young age. This type of situation is not ideal for the health of a child in that it affects the proper development of the child in terms of self esteem and confidence. It also makes a child approach all the difficulties they come across in their lives with a negative point of view as opposed to being positive. Children who have lost loved ones at an early age tend to act out more often than not due to the constant need of attention from the people who surround them. It is thus important to ensure that the proper stages of grieving are followed though the use of counseling from the family or a professional (Boerre, 2006).

Conclusion

Death is inevitable to all the living things that walk on the face of this earth. Human beings are therefore tasked with the responsibility of living a healthy and full lifestyle. This involves being positive even though one is faced with hardships. One of the ways that makes the acceptance of the death of a person easier is the knowing that the person was happy and enjoyed their life to the fullest. Another way that human beings can go about this situation is the appreciation for the life they still have due to the fact that it is not a permanent gift.

References

Boerre, G. (2006) Jean Piaget. Personality Theories. Retrieved August 18, 2011

from http ://webspacg.sh ip.edu/csSmee, Clive. (2000). “Department of Health Special Section: Reconsidering the Role of Competition in Health Care Markets”. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 25 (5): 945–951

Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary (2010) Death. Retrieved August 18, 2011

from http ://www. merriam-webster.com/d dictionary/death

MedicineNet.Com (2004) Grief. Retrieved August 18, 2011

from http ://wwv.medicinenet.com/script/main/art. asp? Article key: 83 860

Family Education Network (2010) ‘Helping Your Child Deal with the Death of a Parent’.

Retrieved August 18, 2011 from http://lifb.familyeducation.com/death-and-dying/toddler/53 891.html

Gardner, H. (2006). Multiple Intelligence: New Horizons, New York, Basic Books.

Hois, S. (2001) Effects of Separation and Loss on Children’s Development.

Retrieved August, 20 I 1 from http: //www. Nurturing parenting commit research validation/ effects_separation_and_loss.pdf

Hughes, D. L. (2007). “Universal coverage in the land of smiles: lessons from Thailand’s 30 baht health reforms”. Health Affairs, 26 (4): 999–1008.

Munir, F. (2005)’Muslim Understanding of Death’. Alkalirna, 7 (l).

Koocher, G. (2002) ‘Discussing Death with Children’. Children Today, l9-37.

Kornhaber, L., Fierros, G., Veneema, A. (2004). Multiple Intelligence: Ideas from Research and Practice, Pearson / Allyn and Bacon Publishers.

Kr”rbler-Ross, E. (1969). On Death ancl Dying. New York: McMillan.

Orbach, I., Gross, Y., and Glaubman, H. (2006) ‘Children’s Perception of Death in Humans and animals as a Function of Age, Anxiety, and Cognitive Ability’. Journal of Child

Psychology and Psychiatry, 26(3), 453-463.

Sengendo, J. and Nambi, J. (2001)’ the psychological effect of orphan hood: a study of orphans In Rakai district’. Health Transition Review, 105- 4

Shanks. N.H. (2007). Introduction to Health Care Management. Johns & Bartlett Publishers.

Souza, P. and Klein, D. (2001). Child Mental Health in Sonoma Country Family Action

Of ‘Sanoma country, 89-91.

Stowe, H. B. (1865) Little.Foxes,’ Or the Insignificant Little Habits Which Mar Domestic

Happiness. United Kingdom: Kessinger Publishing.

Natiorial Institute of Health Patient Intimation Publications (2006) Talking Children about Death, p. l-14.

Posted in Uncategorized

Life insurance is basically a contract between an insurer who is the policy giver and the insured who is the policy holder.

Life insurance is basically a contract between an insurer who is the policy giver and the insured who is the policy holder.

Life insurance

Name

Professor

Course

Date

Life insurance is basically a contract between an insurer who is the policy giver and the insured who is the policy holder. The insurer promises to pay a fortune to the insured upon his/her death in exchange of agreed premium payments from the client. The contract which is negotiable depends on other external factors that influence payment such as the current health conditions of the individual, particularly on issues to do with terminal illness.

These contracts are legally binding with written specifics concerning the limitations and extensions of liability on the insured events. The liability of the insurer may be limited in cases such as suicide where the contract may be ruled null and void. Such special exclusions will wholly depend on the time agreement between the two parties or the statutes of the locality where the contract was enforced.

Mortality tables are used to calculate policy prices given by the insurer with keen actuarial studies on probability of death occurrences and statistics. Some of the variables also used by insurers are gender and age. Age indeed is considered an important variable of interest as rates rises with age.

In an event of the death of the insured, the claim can only be settled upon provision of an authentic death certificate as objective evidence with additional investigations by the insurer on the cause of death. When all these are proved, the insurer will now have an obligation to settle the claim with the beneficiaries, either on annuity payment or lump sum.

Types of life insurance

Life insurance policies may either be temporary or permanent. Temporary provisions are those that cover up to an agreed period while permanent are those that remain active throughout the policy holder’s life unless defaults in payments of premium occur; where your cover will be terminated with no refunds. Under temporary and permanent, life insurances is also divided into the following subclasses: universal, endowment, term and whole life insurances.

Universal life coverage is a permanent coverage with flexible premium payments and death benefits. Flexible death benefit is where the insured can chose to reduce or increase the death benefit. This cover is also less expensive when compared to whole life policy.

Endowment life insurance is a cover linked to an agreed age known as the endowment age. The value of the policy is equated to benefits on death at a certain age. Endowments are temporary and are paid out at the specified age whether the policy holder outlives or dies. Compared to whole life or universal life, endowments are expensive due to the shortened periods.

Term life insurance offers a cover to a specified period with factors such as length of cover, premium to be paid and the lump sum amount, taken into great account. Term life insurance can also be renewable depending on agreements.

Whole life cover is a permanent life cover with benefits provided at death. The premiums payments are constant throughout depending on earlier quotations at the onset of the contract. This policy accumulates your cash reserves from investments made by the insurer using your premiums. The interests from these investments can be used to settle your remaining premiums or be reinvested upon your consent. When compared to term, payment of benefits in this policy occurs upon regardless of age.

Despite the lack of efficacy in claim settlements by some insurers or breach of contract upon complexities, life cover is an investment worth taking to financially protect your loved ones in your absence.

References.

Maclean, J. B. (1962). Life insurance (9th Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Steuer, A. (2010). Questions and answers on life insurance: the life insurance tool book (3rd Ed.). Alameda, CA: Life Insurance Sage Press.

Posted in Uncategorized