Blog

Life goes on logic model

Life goes on logic model

Life goes on logic model:Statement of Need: The mission of “Life goes on” is to reduce rates of suicide among older adults through awareness, education and community based interventions.

Input -685804064000 Process -53975-255524000 1243330571500Output Outcome

Short-term Long-term -590553111500 Impact

Clients

Counselors

Case Manager

Volunteers

Handouts

Facility

Referrals and Resources Providing one forum quarterly to address the needs, services and education of older adult to families, friends, guardians and clients Increased awareness on depression and suicidal thoughts The public and the society’s increased awareness on depression and suicidal thoughts amongst older people Promotion of mental resilience and connectedness between the older adults, family, friends and guardians.

Reduction of depression and suicidal thoughts amongst adults aged 65 and above

Hold a weekly support group for the clients to increase social skills, awareness and prevention.

increased social skills, awareness and prevention amongst support group Public awareness on people at risk of committing suicide Improved identification of precursors to suicide among older adults Provide trainings twice a year to recognize and respond to suicidal risks among older adults.

Recognition and response to suicidal risks among older adults.

Educating the public on handling suicidal risks Utilize social media to raise awareness of suicidal among older adults Increased awareness of suicidal issues amongst older adults through the social media Input -685804064000 Process -457203746500-53975-255524000 Output -457204191000 Outcome

Short-term Long-term -590553111500 Impact

Clients

Counselors

Case Manager

Volunteers

Handouts

Facility

Referrals and Resources During National Suicide prevention week which is surrounded by World National Suicide Prevention day LGO would host a candlelight vigil to honor the lives of those who were effective by suicide among older adults. Advocate for administrative and policy measures to assist with the care of older Reduction of suicidal cases amongst older adults

Network annually with California authorities to create awareness on mental health among older adults through public policy forums in the capital. Increased public awareness on mental health issues. Offer weekly wellness checks to clients Reduced suicide rates amongst older people

Posted in Uncategorized

LIFE COACHING THROUGH DIFFERENT TRANSITIONS

LIFE COACHING THROUGH DIFFERENT TRANSITIONS

LIFE COACHING  

LIFE COACHING THROUGH DIFFERENT TRANSITIONS 

 

 

 

 

 

Life Coaching and Transition

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earl R. Owens Jr.

LIFC 501

Liberty University

 

Abstract

Life coaching is a practice that provides a chance to make leaders and develop states of mental stability through several challenges as well as transitional stages. However, in order to achieve this, there is need for a working relationship, a form of partnership, between the client and the coach. It is the responsibility of the coach, based on the training acquired, to come up with the right path to follow to handle the problem, while the client is responsible in making sure that the coach receives all the details he needs to make therapy a success. Life coaching can leave a positive impact on the life of the client if all the conditions are adhered to or can leave the client worse than when they were should the client choose not to do what the coach requires of him. In section one, this paper talks about the types of life coaching and in section two, a reflection of what life coaching is all about and how to make coaching a success.

Section One

Life coaching is a practical form of counseling that therapeutically inspires, guides, and assists clients in making their own decisions based on choices they feel are essential to them contrary to what other people feel for them. As a result of this, it is expected that life coaching sessions should be a constant source that unfailingly forces inspiring the client to embrace a positive attitude towards life. There are various life challenges that make a client seek for the services of a life coach and clients who manage to go through a life coaching session come out stronger, more reliable, and positive minded. This is because they are taught to accept, embrace, and see beyond the challenge (Biswas-Diener 2009). These sessions are meant to give motivation that mends the client’s state of brokenness. According to Collin, life coaching is a relationship that calls for a partnership between the victim and the therapist to work together to overcome the immediate challenges and concentrate on what matters most to the victim i.e. their goals in life. Life is not a smooth ride from childhood to adulthood and because of this, there are several setbacks that must be faced, some of which inflict pain and render us weak. However, there is strength in weakness if the victim accepts the challenge and sees past the brokenness and low self-esteem. For every therapeutic session to be a success the client must have the self drive needed to overcome the problem and in order for this to happen, he must make the choice from deep within self to overcome the problem (McCluskey 2008). Upon accepting the problem, it then becomes the coaches’ call to help the client transition from victim to victor and are able to do this through a series of experimental learning that enhance the clients performance towards their life’s goals.

Life coaching comes in various types. First, leadership coaching is the type that deals with adopting life challenges and creating leadership through a transitional process by which the client embrace life’s differences. Leadership coaching navigates the clients mind to bring out the strong components that a leader must have. According to Robertson 2009, this type of coaching “requires a willingness to listen, to change and adapt, and to connect and engage others in the learning journey at which leadership is relational” where at the end, the client develops a positive attitude towards life and focuses more on their goals.

Second, career transition coaching is the type that deals with direction and guidance in making choices regarding career. In this, clients approach the coach when they feel the need to seek help in deciding what they should to do and what career choices they should make. The main reason that prompts the client to seek this type of counseling is the low esteem that people have that renders them afraid of change. Upon pointing out the problem, the therapist conducts sessions that navigates the client’s perspective towards the problem and teaches them to embrace the change, shun away from the fear, and make the right choice towards the problem. It should be clearly noted that, a person’s behavior needs not be determined by the state of fear he is in (Genova 2010). Fear can be controlled and therapists believe that when we concentrate more on our fears we tend to overlook opportunities that may be lying beneath waiting to be noticed. Older people are more likely to face careers related fears in a positive way compared to young people because as time goes, working experiences that people go through enables them to transition from one state to another. This makes older people have a developmental mindset compared to young people (Collins 2009). According to Bourgeois, “Spirituality in the workplace translates into leaders who are authentic, socially responsible, doing what’s right no matter what and respecting each other” and as such, it is very important to work positively with a spirit filled mind.

Another type of coaching is motivation coaching. In this type, clients are in need of help that can boost their esteem education wise. As a result of this, many people are on the run to empowering themselves and attaining that form of edge that will make them stand out from the rest as they look for success. According to words of Gelona, motivation coaching is “a collaborative process for enabling clients to better understands how to generate and maintain higher self- motivation for pursuing goals and desired outcomes”. The main reason for this type of coaching is to redirect people back to their goals after they lose their sense to establish goals because of lost interests or died passions to be successful. Clear definitions must be made by the client to help him understand what his profession requires of him and this can only be made possible if a life coach navigates the client’s view of his potential (Drake 2008). This type of coaching is triggered by the fact that there is need for a work relationship between the employer and the employee to help them transition from one stage to another in order to meet pressing demands. Harris, Winskowski, and Engdahl describe a positive relationship between an employer and employee as a remedy to a strong and positive organizational structure that meets work demands.

Gelona goes ahead to say, “a force which arises from within the individual, that activates and enables the individual to pursue a particular task, event, job, or goal”, is the most important reason why there is need for motivation coaching. This force is the reason why people are able to distinguish and serve their functions while pushing forward in understanding their reason for living. Natural motivation is there in every person but when this fails, motivation coaching becomes critical to restore an individual’s purpose in life. Various people require motivational coaching to redirect them to their goals and achieve their expected outcomes in life (Gelona 2011). The most important and underlying element that must be present for any form of coaching to be successful is trust. The client must be able to disclose to the coach without the fear that the coach will share with other people, the same element applies to the coach. By applying this element, a bond is formed between the client and the coach and the two are able to share freely. The client becomes the recipient of the coaches’ skills that helps him turn his thoughts around towards any situation while the coach gets a chance to guide, inspire, and assists the client in achieving the best that is in him. Through this, the client gets the motivation required, which in turn transforms the client to be a leader to first, him and then others (Robertson 2009).

The impact of having a coach in one’s life helps transition the individual from a trouble minded to a goal oriented person who stands at a comfortable position to make right decisions irrespective of the challenge. Coaching also helps an individual to gain knowledge through the partnership formed between the client and the coach enabling them determine the important values of work as well as life (Robertson 2009). Through these transitions that results from coaching, an individual becomes the benefactor of change for the good of the families, school, and community at large. It is therefore the responsibility of coaches to help clients balance their lives and live a focused life (Collins 2009). Collins goes ahead to explain “coaching for balance begins with helping people figure out what they value most in life and then ordering their lives around in it” through this, a client is able to analyze and assess what is important in their lives as well as appreciating the different seasons in life.

Section Two

Coaches are professionals like others and most of coaching skills can be attained through learning. Anyone considered a coach must have specialized training as well as experience on the related areas (Brenna 2008). Just like any other profession, coaching too has a lot of challenges. The first and most important thing that must be emphasized is that coaching is a profession and the kind of seriousness required in other professions must be applied in it as well. However, coaching integrity can be attained through transparency. Applied science and psychology are two fields that are necessarily important in coaching (Hawkins 2008). These two fields help show the importance of social aspects of life that define the state of balance that an individual must have to be able to lead a positive life. These social aspects are recreation, religion, and work. It is very crucial how one relates to what he does because how one does what he does affects his life, this is true and makes sense the words of Drake “coaches need evidence that informs their awareness, shapes their assessment, and guides their actions”. It is the responsibility of every coach to comprehend what affects their clients, what they go through, and how to help solve the problem. By doing this, the coach stands in a position to inspire, guide, and assist the client by providing them with skills that redirects their way of thinking. Evidence is crucial in how coaches solves the client’s problems, and for better results, it is the duty of the coach to ensure that sufficient evidence is gathered. With adequate training, sufficient experiences, and evidence at hand, the coach is able to offer the best professional standards of services needed.

Every individual is at one point or the other in their life going through some changes. These changes can be in specified time or passage. It is expected that coaching, while helping solve these changes and other challenges in the client’s life, provide assurance quality to the client. Leadership, career, and motivational coaching opens up the broad scope of coaching to make one understand that there are various challenges in life that must be solved to help the client face life, after the challenge, in a positive way (Gelona 2011). The line being drawn out more clearly is that coaching is a process that inspires, guides, and assist clients through redirecting their thoughts from problem to solution oriented mindset that gives positive living as the outcome. As a result of this, coaching is fundamental in restoring the clients’ ability to focus on their goals irrespective of the challenges they face.

Palmer 2011, points out that problem identification is very important in solving a client’s problem. Upon identifying the problem, the coach directs the client on the most realistic way that can help the client make the relevant goals which must be worked on to regain control over the problem. For any session to be successful, the coach must enquire for details as evidence; revolve around it investigating the possible options that will give the right solution be it in a leadership, career, or motivational case (Palmer 2011).

Conclusion

Coaching is a therapeutic session that is aimed at inspiring, guiding, and assisting a client to find the best way to live life positively despite the challenge encountered. There are several types of coaching, leadership, career, and motivational coaching all described above and how important they are in solving a client’s problem. This paper has done a reflection on the research of coaching, what needs to be done to offer the best services to the client and the parts that the responsible parties must play in making a therapeutic session a success.

It is better to understand that there are some situations in life that we cannot force our way out and we are safe surrendering them to the higher power, God. This can only help us have the state of sanity that we cannot otherwise achieve working our things our way and only the words of Collins “I can’t change the wind, but I can adjust the sails” can help us understand. 

Reference

 Biswas-Diener, R. (2009). Personal coaching as a positive intervention. Journal Of Clinical

Psychology, 65(5), 544-553.

Bourgeois, T. (2006). The challenge of changing values, beliefs, and expectations. Leader To

Leader, 2006(42), 7-10.  Brennan, D. (2008).

Coaching in the US: trends and challenges. Coaching: An International Journal Of Theory,

Research & Practice, 1(2), 186-191.

Collins, G.R. (2009). Christian coaching: Helping others turn potential into reality. Colorado

Springs, CO: NavPress.

Drake, D. B. (2008). Finding our way home: coaching’s search for identity in a new era.

Coaching: An International Journal Of Theory, Research & Practice, 1(1), 16-27.

Gelona, J. (2011). Does thinking about motivation boost motivation levels?. Coaching

Psychologist, 7(1), 42-48.

Genova, J. (2010). Our Stories: Leveraging Them for Career Transition. Vital Speeches Of the

Day, 76(5), 234-237.

Harris, J., Winskowski, A., & Engdahl, B. E. (2007). Types of Workplace Social Support in the

Prediction of Job Satisfaction. Career Development Quarterly, 56(2), 150-156.

Hawkins, P. (2008). The coaching profession: some of the key challenges. Coaching: An

International Journal Of Theory, Research & Practice, 1(1), 28-38.

McCluskey, C. (2008). A Christian-therapist-turned-coach discusses his journey and the field of

life coaching. (Clinicians’ Columns). Journal Of Psychology And Christianity Fall 2008.

Palmer, S. (2011). Revisiting the ‘P’ in the PRACTICE coaching model. Coaching Psychologist,

7(2), 156-158.

 Robertson, J. (2009). Coaching leadership learning through partnership. School  Leadership &

Management, 29(1), 39-49.

Posted in Uncategorized

Life Application. Overestimating people’s thoughts about you

Life Application. Overestimating people’s thoughts about you

Life Application

Contents

TOC o “1-3” h z u Overestimating people’s thoughts about you PAGEREF _Toc378195130 h 1Life changing decision PAGEREF _Toc378195131 h 1My first year at high school PAGEREF _Toc378195132 h 2

Overestimating people’s thoughts about youThe opinions that people hold on an individual’s actions, behavior or simply their personality has a great impact on that particular person. There are instances where one can underestimate or even overestimate how other people think of them. I have been in a situation where I totally overestimated how much other people were thinking about me. This occurred during the first few days that I had joined college. I usually made sure that I was early for class and would seat at the front of the class. I would always answer all the questions that were asked even if I did not know the answer. I used to do all this so that I could attract attention and hence be noticed by the rest of the class.

However, this was not the case as one day I asked one of my classmates what they thought of me. Was shocked to realize that he had not noticed my presence in the class and was not even sure we were classmates. This was contrary to my expectations since I expected that everyone in class knew me and thought of me as brilliant student. My situation was quite similar to adolescent egocentrism as I believed that the rest of the class was attentive to my appearance since I always sat at the front. I also believed that they paid attention to my behavior since I was answering al the questions so that I could be noticed. With adolescent egocentrism there is belief that all eyes are on you as a person and this is exactly what I thought (Fraser, 2010).

Life changing decisionI took a decision to change schools from a local school to an international school. This was life changing decision since it is through the school that I met many people from different countries and cultures that made me get the exposure that I would need for my career. It was quite emotional to leave my friends that I had known for a very long time to go to a totally different country. It would be hard for me to settle and get to make other friends and get used to them. This was the only logical move as studying in my country would not give me the exposure that I so much needed. Therefore there was an interaction between the logic behind my decision made it easy for me to deal with the situation in a less emotional way.

I would not have made the decision to make the move if I had given the matter less thought. I looked at the advantages of my decision against the disadvantages and the advantages outnumbered the disadvantages. If I could have given the matter less thought then I could not have weighed my options and could not have made the decision that I made.

My first year at high schoolI attended an international high school which was not in my country. During my first year at the international school I thought that everything would be same as it was back at home. However, this was not the case as the students there were not as hospitable and friendly like the way it was back at home. It was quite difficult to make friends and interact with people in the school. This is because most of the students came from different backgrounds hence behaving in different ways that were often not accommodative to others. I made a decision to try as much as possible to fit in the school through making friends and spreading my hospitable nature. His made the later years of my stay in the school were easier and better. It helped to get to know other people and learning to live with people from different cultures and backgrounds in harmony. I influenced the many friends to adopt a hospitable nature and become friendly. We interacted freely and shared our views and ideas which was quite helpful in our studies.The later years of my stay in that school were therefore the best with so much god memories tied to them.

Reference

Fraser, R. (2010). Definition of Adolescent Egocentrism .Retrieved May 4, 2013 from http://tweenparenting.about.com/od/behaviordiscipline/a/AdolescentEgocentrism.htm

Posted in Uncategorized

Lies My Teacher Told Me Down the Memory Hole The Disappearance of the Recent Past

Lies My Teacher Told Me Down the Memory Hole The Disappearance of the Recent Past

Lies My Teacher Told Me “Down the Memory Hole: The Disappearance of the Recent Past”

History textbooks misrepresent the events of September 11. They do not give an account of the past, for instance the relationship of the US and the Middle East. The US is presented as the ‘good guy’ helping the affected states in the attacks whereas they had other motives, to take power of vulnerable states like Iraq.

According to Loewen, history textbooks in the US portray the US positively. This is misleading to the students because they will believe that the US is the best when actually it is not entirely the best (Lowen 2007). Lowen stated that the United States attacked Iraq twice. It was also part of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.

The US helped Saddam Hussein rise to power by helping him fight against the attacks in Iraq. It provided weaponry and also involved the CIA thus influencing Saddam’s rise to power.

George Bush was justified in invading Iraq because Saddam was able to produce weapons of mass destruction (WMD) over a given time frame. Besides, Saddam’s WMD could have been hidden or ferried to another country (Lowen 2007).

There are many reasons history textbooks will present about the reason why US attacked Iraq. For instance, the US wanted to help the people of Iraq and lead them to democracy. However, according to Loewen, US attacked Iraq because it wanted to get rid of the threats posed by Saddam. Saddam had weapons of mass destruction and this could possibly be accessed by Al-Qaeda. The US also wanted to take charge of the oil in Iraq which would be a great source of economic benefit for it.

After the 9/11 attacks, the US launched attack on Iraq mainly to avenge the 9/11 attacks that had affected it.

Israel helped the US deal with threats from the external arena and also boost each other in terms of technological advancement. The countries in the Middle East view this relationship as a mutual relationship with both countries benefiting from each other.

This chapter is a critique of what most history textbooks in the US presents. As such, I have developed reservations for some of the arguments. For example, I do not anymore entirely believe that the US is a perfect continent. Some of the reasons it went into war, for example in Iraq, was not to help the suffering citizens but to benefit indirectly. This is rather selfish and many books do not argue this possibility. Many authors only discuss the positive side of the US’ intervention.

Top of Form

Loewen, J. W. (2007). Lies my teacher told me: Everything your American history textbook got wrong. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Bottom of Form

Posted in Uncategorized

Introduction (17)

Introduction (17)

Lifetime Appointment of the U.S. Supreme Courts System

Student’s name

Institutional affiliation

Introduction

In the United States, the appointment of judges to the Supreme Court is among the most decisions a president can ever make. This is because inline with the U.S. Constitution, justices serving at the Supreme Court are allowed to serve a lifetime and are only separated from office if they retire, resign, or are removed from office. This aspect makes the U.S. democracy distinct from other democracies that strict term limits or mandatory retirement ages for high court judges. For instance, in the United Kingdom, justices undergo mandatory retirement at 70 years, as do judges in Australia High courts. Most judges in the United States history retire prior, but a few died while in office, including Justice Ruth Ginsburg, who recently died in September 2020 after serving at the Supreme Court for 27 years (Kearney, 2019). In 1787, by the time the U.S. constitution was ratified, the average life expectancy for white males was 38 years; today, the life expectancy in the U.S. stands at 79 years. This means that the average justice serves the courts for 28 years. There is an argument that the framers never intended justices to serve as long as they do now since life expectancy was considerably shorter at the time of the drafting of the Constitution. This essay points out the pros and cons of lifetime appointment of judges and asserts that the tenure of Supreme Court Justices should have strict age limits rather than lifetime appointment.

Pros of Lifetime Appointment of Judges

Permanency in Office Contributes to independence and Firmness of Supreme Courts.

The essence of guaranteeing justices a position on the benches for a lifetime or until they retire is to guard the courts against fighting partisan battles. The Supreme Court represents the highest Court in the entire U.S. justice system, making it susceptible to external influences hence preventing it from functioning fairly and independently. The Supreme Court is a point of reference against the president’s office as well as congress. Lifetime appointment is deemed helpful as it is intended to ensure that the corridors of justice are insulated against political pressure and they serve genuinely autonomous of government arms. This way, judges are protected from being sacked if they make decisions that are unpopular. In theory, lifetime appointment allows justices to concentrate on the law enforcement rather than politics. Additionally, while a president might nominate an individual to the position of justice because they view them as an ideological or political ally, they cannot be recalled even if political alignment or ideologies change upon getting to the bench. Noteworthy, there is data to suggest that as they age, ideologies of many justices drift leftward. This shows that article III of the Constitution is timely as it prevents wrangles that can arise from having justices that are unbiased or with personal interest in Congress, the Public, or the elected president. According to Alexander Hamilton, who wrote in Federalists No.78, the lack of limits in terms for federal justices “is the best expedient which can be devised in government to secure a steady, upright, and impartial administration of the laws” (Black, & Owens 2016).

Life Time Appointment of Justices Protects Courts’ Legitimacy

In this case, legitimacy is the court’s ability to resolve disagreements using ways that are acceptable by the citizens even when they do not like the decision. Critiques of the ideology of having a term limit maintain that having a lifetime appointment policy is viable as it insulates judges from political pressure hence protecting the Court’s legitimacy (McMillion, 2017). Worth noting, if citizens do not view Courts as legitimate, they are less likely to trust and follow its opinion. On the other hand, having term limits to justices’ tenure for 18 years would only cushion judges from politics from a given amount of time hence tarnishing the Court’s legitimacy.

Cons of Lifetime Appointment of Federal Justices

Lifetime Appointment is a Barrier to Combating Partisan Imbalance in the Courts System

As is, there is no political balance when it comes to giving each president equal nominations of justices through their terms in office. To date, presidential appointments are unevenly distributed between Republican presidents and Democrats. Of the past 18 justices, only four (4) were adopted by democrats, although less than 50% of presidents in the last 50 years were republicans. Worth noting, ideally, about 50% of justices should have been appointed by Democratic presidents and 50% by republican presidents to reflect the majority of the population’s political ideologies at the time of the vacancy. Lifetime appointment of judges does not solve the imbalance as there is no stipulated time when a judge should serve. If there was a term limit, it would solve the imbalance by limiting presidents’ appointments to two per term. This would allow future democratic presidents to appoint more justices to the Supreme Court than they have had thus far.

Life Time Appointment Exacerbates Divisiveness Following the Confirmation Process

Allowing federal justices to serve a lifetime reinforces the division which follows the process of appointing these individuals. Although Justice Scalia was confirmed in 1986 98-0, very few Democrats would agree with him. Notably, since then, no justice has been confirmed unanimously. Instead, nowadays, justices are being confirmed with narrow margins at high rates. Moreover, votes are now aligned with political party lines; for instance, Justice Kavanaugh and Justice Gorsuch were confirmed with 50-48 and 54-45 votes respectively. It is imperative to note that augmented partisanship of the process paints judges as mere political figures rather than unbiased interpreters of the Constitution. In turn, this affects the citizens’ viewpoint towards the courts and the entire justice system. If there were a law to limit the age of service for justices, it would balance the number of judges nominated by each president, thus helping the confirmation process become less partisan.

Conclusion

The issue of nomination of Supreme Courts’ Justice by the present elect in the United States is an important decision to the state and the citizens. This is because, in line with their Constitution, federal judges are permitted to serve a life time and are allowed to leave office only if thy resign, retire or are impeached. I maintain the position that there is need to put strict age limits that restrict justices to serve until they a particular age. The first reason for supporting this notion is that incorporating age limits would solve the imbalance by limiting presidents’ appointments to two per term. This follows the fact that there is no political balance when it comes to giving each president equal nominations of justices through their terms in office. Additionally, if there was a law to limit the age of service for justices, it would balance the number of justices nominated by each president, thus helping the confirmation process become less partisan. The division is evidenced by the narrow margins experienced during the confirmations of justices in the appointment and confirmation process. There is a need to cross-examine how viable article III of the Constitution and if need be, amendment in line with the legal procedures.

References

Black, R. C., & Owens, R. J. (2016). Courting the president: how circuit court judges alter their behavior for promotion to the Supreme Court. American Journal of Political Science, 60(1), 30-43.

Kearney, M. (2019). When to Step Down: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and the Supreme Court. Women Leading Change: Case Studies on Women, Gender, and Feminism, 4(1).

McMillion, B. J. (2017). Supreme Court Appointment Process: President’s Selection of a Nominee. Congressional Research Service.

Posted in Uncategorized

Introduction (16)

Introduction (16)

Lifetime Appointment of the U.S. Supreme Courts System

Student’s name

Institutional affiliation

Introduction

In the United States, the appointment of judges to the Supreme Court is among the most decisions a president can ever make. This is because inline with the U.S. Constitution, justices serving at the Supreme Court are allowed to serve a lifetime and are only separated from office if they retire, resign, or are removed from office. This aspect makes the U.S. democracy distinct from other democracies that strict term limits or mandatory retirement ages for high court judges. For instance, in the United Kingdom, justices undergo mandatory retirement at 70 years, as do judges in Australia High courts. Most judges in the United States history retire prior, but a few died while in office, including Justice Ruth Ginsburg, who recently died in September 2020 after serving at the Supreme Court for 27 years (Kearney, 2019). In 1787, by the time the U.S. constitution was ratified, the average life expectancy for white males was 38 years; today, the life expectancy in the U.S. stands at 79 years. This means that the average justice serves the courts for 28 years. There is an argument that the framers never intended justices to serve as long as they do now since life expectancy was considerably shorter at the time of the drafting of the Constitution. This essay points out the pros and cons of lifetime appointment of judges and asserts that the tenure of Supreme Court Justices should have strict age limits rather than lifetime appointment.

Pros of Lifetime Appointment of Judges

Permanency in Office Contributes to independence and Firmness of Supreme Courts.

The essence of guaranteeing justices a position on the benches for a lifetime or until they retire is to guard the courts against fighting partisan battles. The Supreme Court represents the highest Court in the entire U.S. justice system, making it susceptible to external influences hence preventing it from functioning fairly and independently. The Supreme Court is a point of reference against the president’s office as well as congress. Lifetime appointment is deemed helpful as it is intended to ensure that the corridors of justice are insulated against political pressure and they serve genuinely autonomous of government arms. This way, judges are protected from being sacked if they make decisions that are unpopular. In theory, lifetime appointment allows justices to concentrate on the law enforcement rather than politics. Additionally, while a president might nominate an individual to the position of justice because they view them as an ideological or political ally, they cannot be recalled even if political alignment or ideologies change upon getting to the bench. Noteworthy, there is data to suggest that as they age, ideologies of many justices drift leftward. This shows that article III of the Constitution is timely as it prevents wrangles that can arise from having justices that are unbiased or with personal interest in Congress, the Public, or the elected president. According to Alexander Hamilton, who wrote in Federalists No.78, the lack of limits in terms for federal justices “is the best expedient which can be devised in government to secure a steady, upright, and impartial administration of the laws” (Black, & Owens 2016).

Life Time Appointment of Justices Protects Courts’ Legitimacy

In this case, legitimacy is the court’s ability to resolve disagreements using ways that are acceptable by the citizens even when they do not like the decision. Critiques of the ideology of having a term limit maintain that having a lifetime appointment policy is viable as it insulates judges from political pressure hence protecting the Court’s legitimacy (McMillion, 2017). Worth noting, if citizens do not view Courts as legitimate, they are less likely to trust and follow its opinion. On the other hand, having term limits to justices’ tenure for 18 years would only cushion judges from politics from a given amount of time hence tarnishing the Court’s legitimacy.

Cons of Lifetime Appointment of Federal Justices

Lifetime Appointment is a Barrier to Combating Partisan Imbalance in the Courts System

As is, there is no political balance when it comes to giving each president equal nominations of justices through their terms in office. To date, presidential appointments are unevenly distributed between Republican presidents and Democrats. Of the past 18 justices, only four (4) were adopted by democrats, although less than 50% of presidents in the last 50 years were republicans. Worth noting, ideally, about 50% of justices should have been appointed by Democratic presidents and 50% by republican presidents to reflect the majority of the population’s political ideologies at the time of the vacancy. Lifetime appointment of judges does not solve the imbalance as there is no stipulated time when a judge should serve. If there was a term limit, it would solve the imbalance by limiting presidents’ appointments to two per term. This would allow future democratic presidents to appoint more justices to the Supreme Court than they have had thus far.

Life Time Appointment Exacerbates Divisiveness Following the Confirmation Process

Allowing federal justices to serve a lifetime reinforces the division which follows the process of appointing these individuals. Although Justice Scalia was confirmed in 1986 98-0, very few Democrats would agree with him. Notably, since then, no justice has been confirmed unanimously. Instead, nowadays, justices are being confirmed with narrow margins at high rates. Moreover, votes are now aligned with political party lines; for instance, Justice Kavanaugh and Justice Gorsuch were confirmed with 50-48 and 54-45 votes respectively. It is imperative to note that augmented partisanship of the process paints judges as mere political figures rather than unbiased interpreters of the Constitution. In turn, this affects the citizens’ viewpoint towards the courts and the entire justice system. If there were a law to limit the age of service for justices, it would balance the number of judges nominated by each president, thus helping the confirmation process become less partisan.

Conclusion

The issue of nomination of Supreme Courts’ Justice by the present elect in the United States is an important decision to the state and the citizens. This is because, in line with their Constitution, federal judges are permitted to serve a life time and are allowed to leave office only if thy resign, retire or are impeached. I maintain the position that there is need to put strict age limits that restrict justices to serve until they a particular age. The first reason for supporting this notion is that incorporating age limits would solve the imbalance by limiting presidents’ appointments to two per term. This follows the fact that there is no political balance when it comes to giving each president equal nominations of justices through their terms in office. Additionally, if there was a law to limit the age of service for justices, it would balance the number of justices nominated by each president, thus helping the confirmation process become less partisan. The division is evidenced by the narrow margins experienced during the confirmations of justices in the appointment and confirmation process. There is a need to cross-examine how viable article III of the Constitution and if need be, amendment in line with the legal procedures.

References

Black, R. C., & Owens, R. J. (2016). Courting the president: how circuit court judges alter their behavior for promotion to the Supreme Court. American Journal of Political Science, 60(1), 30-43.

Kearney, M. (2019). When to Step Down: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and the Supreme Court. Women Leading Change: Case Studies on Women, Gender, and Feminism, 4(1).

McMillion, B. J. (2017). Supreme Court Appointment Process: President’s Selection of a Nominee. Congressional Research Service.

Posted in Uncategorized

Lifes disappointments

Lifes disappointments

Life’s disappointments

Contents

TOC o “1-3” h z u Introduction PAGEREF _Toc381195462 h 1Coping with disappointment PAGEREF _Toc381195463 h 1Conclusion PAGEREF _Toc381195464 h 2

IntroductionIn life one is likely to face disappointments. Life’s disappointments come in different sizes and shapes and they occur to people of different ages though at the core exists a similar principle. Disappointments exist as a result of the difference between what one expects and what is there in reality. Depending on how deep the disappointment is one might experience a wide range of emotions such as sadness, hurt, jealousy or anger over a period of time.

Coping with disappointmentIf one is already in the throes of disappointment they should not be depressed instead one should sit down and the alternatives that may present themselves in the situation. Denial is very powerful therefore accepting the situation as it is very crucial. For instance if the disappointment is someone that has not come through in the intended way then one should let go and focus on things that they will get positive returns.

One should also draw inspiration fro their role models after being disappointed. Very many people around us can be role models as they come through difficult situations successfully. This can be friends, family members or even celebrities. Gaining strength from their life journey’s of this people enable one to move forward towards their future as well as from disappointing situations.

Talking to friends or family can help one get cope with the situation easily. Letting out the disappointment is very important this is by letting people around you know how one feels. People can give their ideas on how best one can handle the situation. One should not allow themselves to be victims but instead one should be ready to talk of about disappointments, acknowledge them and forgive those that disappointed them and move on. Holding on resentment that is negative will only weigh someone down .one should not look back but forge forward.

One should find hope and optimism in their life. If the particular situation that lead to the disappointment has failed then should look forward to other options that can work out. Creation of other goals and objectives as well as finding people that will cheer one also helps the situation. In life there are always positive things to aspire to therefore one should not be afraid of taking risks simply because of one or two disappointments that someone has been through.

Some disappointments have the potential of hitting someone hard and it often takes time before working them through and moving forward. One should therefore be patient with themselves as they go through that phase of recovery. Knowing that at the end of the day there is hope in every situation and therefore approaching a situation differently ensures that one gets through the situation and any other disappointment that they might come across.

ConclusionCoping with disappointments is just the same as coping with loss. Disappointments help one build their character and patience if one deals with them appropriately. When one copes with the disappointment in a healthy way then one will reach a point where they not only accept the situation but also learn from it. Coping with disappointment is very difficult but if one words through it then other opportunities present themselves.

Posted in Uncategorized

The article Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder a review of the essential facts by Daley D

The article Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder a review of the essential facts by Daley D

Life Span Development

Author

Institution

Date

Introduction

The article “Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: a review of the essential facts” by Daley D examined the various issues pertaining to the condition. It explains that ADHD refers to a complex disorder that results from genetic and environmental influences or factors. Daley explains that while there has been modification in the name for the last five decades, ADHD’s current diagnosis shares the core inattention, impulsivity, motor restlessness, and symptoms with the earlier terms. The earlier terms include hyperactive child syndrome, minimal brain dysfunction and attention deficit disorder. In addition, the writer states that the etiological explanations of the disorder are either environmental or biological. Biological explanations of the disorder include brain structure and genetics, as well as their bearing on neuropsychology. The predisposing environmental factors include diet and parenting. As concerning intervention methods, the writer focuses on psychosocial intervention and the use of medication. However, he acknowledges that the use of medication has been known to have side effects especially in the case of children below school going age. He also examines asserts the fact that very little is known concerning the relationship between the later expression of ADHD disorder and the early hyperactivity.

It is noteworthy that the writer has been very thorough in examining the predisposing factors and the causes of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. However, the intervention section has been virtually neglected in this journal. Unlike the other sections, the writer has not examined any specific methods of interventions that are used in treating Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, but only goes on to generalize in the form of medication and psychosocial intervention methods.

In addition, the writer has ignored the significance of dietary methods of treating Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Supplementing or modifying one’s diet would in fact remedy the symptoms that are associated with the disorder. In any case, he had acknowledged that the condition could also be caused by the diet of the individual. Would it not follow that changes in the diet would be effective in treating it? Studies show that an individual could eliminate toxic additives in the diet and consume more organic whole foods in order to remedy the problem (Selikowitz, 2009). Food dyes, synthetic sweeteners, processed foods and artificial additives have been shown to trigger abnormalities in the brain, which spurs uncontrollable behavior and inattentiveness. Given that diet plays a significant role in enhancing focus, behavior, and metal capacity, the writer could have done more than mention it among the causes.

In addition, the writer opines that parenting has a bearing on the occurrence of children as well as their parents. While this may be the case, it is noteworthy that the writer does not provide a clear relationship between parenting and the occurrence of ADHD. In addition, that assertion would raise question as to whether the disorder is an ailment or just a result of the environment. It is noteworthy that ADHD has been shown to have a relationship with an individual’s genetic makeup. In this case, the assertion that the condition would arise as a result of parenting raises questions as to whether parenting would have any impact on the genetic make-up of a child or even the parent. Science has shown that this is impossible, which raises questions as to the assertion that parenting causes ADHD (Selikowitz, 2009)

Conclusion

Much is unknown about ADHD, not only as pertaining to it very nature but also on its causes and even the possible remedies. Much still remains to be done on the issue in order to offer a clear explanation to these issues.

References

Mark Selikowitz, 2009. ADHD. London: Oxford University Press.

D. Daley. (2006). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a review of the essential facts

Child: Care, Health and Development journals, Volume 32, Issue 2, pages 193–204

<http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2006.00572.x/full>

Posted in Uncategorized

LIFE OF BARRACK OBAMA

LIFE OF BARRACK OBAMA

LIFE OF BARRACK OBAMA

Student’s name

Department of affiliation

Course

Instructor

Date

LIFE OF BARRACK OBAMA

Introduction

Obama was the president for 8 years

Obama had a difficult childhood

He has a supportive family

He supports his friends especially Joe Biden

Body

The childhood of Obama

The separation with his father

His basic education

His mother

Middle life and college education

His life at Punahou School

His life at Occidental College and Columbia University

His life at Harvard and Meeting Michelle

Later life

His political career

Being the president

Writing career

Family life

Conclusion

After presidency

Supporting Joe Biden and staying with family

References

Olive, D. (2010). An American Story: The Speeches of Barack Obama-A Primer. ECW Press.Darsey, J. (2009). Barack Obama and America’s journey. Southern Communication Journal, 74(1), 88-103.

Remnick, D. (2010). The bridge: The life and rise of Barack Obama. Picador.Obama, B. (2009). Barack Obama. Timeline, 9(10), 11.Maraniss, D. (2012). Barack Obama: The Story. Simon and Schuster.Brill, M. T. (2006). Barack Obama: Working to make a difference. Lerner Publications.

Posted in Uncategorized

Life Lessons

Life Lessons

Life Lessons

Jane has been my friend since childhood. I have known her for as long as I can remember. We went to school together, played together, had sleepovers at each other’s houses. There was never any question that she would always be a part of my life. Nothing could come between us. I believed that we had a healthy friendship because we gave each other space but managed to keep our friendship quite strong. We went to different high schools but remained in the same area, so we would hang out frequently. As we grew up, we shared our triumphs and joys. When I felt sad, I would talk to her about whatever was bothering me. She became more than a friend; she was my family. However, something happened that would change our friendship forever.

One weekend just after I joined college, I asked Jane if she would go out to dinner with me. I had not seen her for a while, and I wanted to talk to her about some challenges I was experiencing while transitioning to college life. I knew I could rely on her for honest and sound advice. She told me that she was feeling rather ill so she would not make it. I wished her a quick recovery and told her I hoped we could hang out soon. However, soon after this, I began to notice that something was amiss. Jane stopped taking my calls and took days to respond to my texts. I was quite hurt as this was unlike her, I tried to ask her what the issue was, but she was not forthcoming. It broke my heart to imagine that our friendship was coming to an end, and I had no idea why.

I decided to give Jane some space to work out any issues she might have. I wrote her a text saying that I would be available to talk whenever she was ready. Still, she did not respond to this. After a few weeks, I grew quite concerned and decided to visit Jane’s house where she lived with her parents. I had been there before, but I did not find Jane at home and decided not to pry further. On this particular day, I found Jane’s mother making lunch, and she invited me to join her. Tactfully, I explained what had been going on between Jane and I. Jane’s mother was quite sympathetic and told me that Jane had been going through a hard time.

A few days before, Jane had checked herself into a mental health facility as she had been struggling with a diagnosed mental illness for a few months. I was alarmed, but her mother told me that she was doing well. Jane did not want to burden me with her illness as she was quite unwell, but she wanted to get better before telling me all about it. She knew that I was in a new chapter of my life in college and wanted to give me time to enjoy myself.

I was both relieved and saddened to learn about this. My best friend did not give me the chance to be there for her during a tough moment, and I felt that I had failed her. On the other hand, I was glad that she had taken the proper steps towards recovery. I learned an important lesson from this experience. As humans, we all go through different phases in life that some of our closest friends and family might not identify with. When this happens, we must walk the difficult paths alone and find a solution to our problems. I also learned the importance of giving our loved ones the space that they need to figure out their lives. When Jane felt better, she called me to explain, and I believe that our friendship is stronger than ever.

Posted in Uncategorized