Blog

Tyson Foods Company Analysis

Tyson Foods Company Analysis

Hello! I recently ordered a paper, but I need a little bit more added to it! I will attach the instructions and the powerpoint needed to see what ratios fall under each Building Block. The analysis is over Tyson Foods, which is the main focus of this essay, but it still needs to include components of a competitor. The paper that I ordered was GREAT! It just needs one more set of data for the horizontal analysis. There is currently three components, so for example it needs to cover years 2019-2022. It can only be EXACTLY ONE PAGE long, no less no over. 

Instructions:

In compliance with the communicative and critical thinking goals of the class, you will be required to submit a 1-page written research paper (a.k.a ‘Company Analysis’) covering a publicly traded company assigned to you in the middle of the semester. This assignment will represent the remaining 20% of your final grade and is worth 100 points. The paper will adhere to a prescribed format. Failure to complete this assignment will be regarded as a failure to meet the requirements of the course and will result in an overall final grade of an “F”. Your task will be to review and analyze the assigned company from an investor’s perspective. 

Guidelines:

  • What do you need to do: Your essay needs to follow the 1-page template attached. For each ratio that you choose from each building block, you will have to use the analysis tools we covered in Ch. 13 (horizontal, vertical, or ratio analysis) and one or more standards (intracompany, competitor, industry, and guidelines) to analyze your company. In the conclusion (last para), you will have to indicate whether you would invest in the company or not and explicitly state why.
  • Just mentioning ratios in your response or defining them is not what this essay is about. You will lose a lot of points if you don’t interpret and compare the ratios based on various analysis tools and standards of comparison. You need to interpret the ratios based on your analysis. The more tools you use and the more comprehensive your analysis, the more points you get!
  • Important tips:
  •  
    • Please ensure you indicate the periods and the numbers for your ratios clearly in your write-up. If you use horizontal analysis (e.g., trends), you need to analyze the information for at least 4 periods.
    • If you compare the ratios for your company to a competitor or the industry average, please ensure that the competitor you select is more or less in the same business or your company fits appropriately in that industry. Please ensure you mention the competitor’s name or describe the industry appropriately if using competitor ratios or industry averages for comparison, respectively.
  • Where to find information for your company: You can use one or more of the following sources – Zacks.com, WSJ.com, Macrotrends.net (if you use other sources, please specify). These websites have ratios in addition to what we have covered in Ch. 13 (Please ensure you do not analyze ratios that we didn’t cover in Ch. 13).
  • Formatting requirements (you will lose points for formatting errors):
    • Times New Roman in 11 point
    • Text should be single-spaced.
    • Have 1-inch margins on all sides of the page
    • Justify all paragraphs so that the text is aligned with both margins
    • Do not leave any additional space between each paragraph.
Posted in Uncategorized

Assignment 1

Assignment 1

Select a company. Using an Internet search, access the company’s latest proxy statement [SEC Form 14A).  Following your review of the statement, briefly describe the information disclosed? What are your overall impressions of the information that was provided? What are your impressions of the diversity of the company? the diversity of the Board of Directors and Top Management Team (TMT)?

Posted in Uncategorized

assignment 4

assignment 4

  1. by writing a report using MS word or excel in response to the problem set.If you submit Word doc, also supply the Excel file so I can view your calculations.
Posted in Uncategorized

Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations II

Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations II

Assessment Description: 

-In this assignment, write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of two quantitative research studies. 

-Use the practice problem and two quantitative, peer-reviewed research articles you identified in the Topic 1 assignment (or two new articles based on instructor feedback) to complete this assignment. 

Practice Problem (PICOT): In senior citizens, does increased exercise and patient teaching reduce the risk for falls versus standard care across 6 months?

-In a 1,000–1,250-word essay, summarize two quantitative studies.

– A clear and concise thesis statement must be noted in the introduction of the essay
 

Use the “Research Critique Guidelines – Part II” document to organize your essay. 
 

-You are required to cite a minimum of three peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.  

-Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide

-This assignment uses a rubric.

Posted in Uncategorized

MSA PART 2

MSA PART 2

Students will create their MSA Phase 2 in Word format. Each section should be typed in Times New Roman 12 point font with 1 inch margins.  You may complete this as an outline, however please treat this as a mini-research paper with the language you use and grammar and spelling. USE COMPLETE SENTENCES. You must provide enough information, covering all concepts in-depth and in their entirety to earn a good grade on this assignment, and list your sources. Do NOT copy and paste. Make sure you scroll down to be certain that you get all of the requirements. 

Phase 2: (Course Outcome 2-4) Students will cover the following information in the assigned format by the due date/time: _____ (25 points)

  • Students will describe/define the following terms related to the Scientific Method:
    • Define Scientific Method _____ 4 points
    • Identify the steps of the scientific method. _____ 8 points
  • Students will describe/define the following terms related to Research Methods and identify 1 advantage of each: _____ 8 points
    • Naturalistic Observation
    • Case Studies
    • Surveys
    • Correlational Studies
  • Students will describe/define the following terms related to the Experimental Method: _____ 10 points
    • Independent, extraneous, and dependent variables
    • Random assignment and control group
    • Main effect and placebo effect
    • Double-blind technique
    • Report limitations of experiments and variations in the experimental design

Students will describe the following schools of thought/psychological perspectives:  _____ 50 points.

  • Philosophy/Physiology
  • Structuralism
  • Functionalism
  • Psychoanalysis/Psychodynamic Perspective
  • Behaviorism/Behavioral Perspective
  • Humanism/Humanistic Perspective
  • Cognitive Perspective
  • Evolutionary Perspective
  • Cross-Cultural Perspective
  • Biological Perspective
  • Anxiety Disorders: GAD, Phobias, PTSD, OCD
  • Mood Disorders: MDD, SAD, Bi-polar
  • Eating Disorders: Anorexia Nervosa, Bulimia Nervosa
  • Personality Disorders: Paranoid, Antisocial, Borderline
  • Dissociative Disorders: Dissociative experiences, Dissociative amnesia, DID
  • Schizophrenia
Posted in Uncategorized

White Collar Crime

White Collar Crime

Using your textbook and other scholarly and professional research material, answer the question below for your analysis: write a 400-word essay and use proper citation as well about Rod Blagojevich was charged with government corruption while serving as Governor of Illinois during 1997 to 2003. Explain the criminal activities that resulted in his impeachment, prosecution, and incarceration. Offer information related to his sentencing and early release from prison. must have 3 references. 

Posted in Uncategorized

William James

William James

To demonstrate knowledge of the evolution of psychology students will explore the psychologists William ja

es,  detail the theories and/or theoretical concepts their psychologist is accredited with, and discuss the major school of thought/theoretical perspective associated with their historic figure by identifying/including the following information. Although this is not necessarily a research paper with a specific length required, you must write each component in essay format using Times New Roman, single spaced, 12 point font, and 1 inch margins. This assignment will be submitted as a word document in canvas. To earn maximum points you must cover each component in depth, that means some components may need a full page or two and some just a detailed paragraph.

  • Present detailed background information on your historical figure (where did they grow up/attend college, what did they study, hardships they faced, etc.) _____ (15 points)
  • Explain, in detail, why your historical figure was/is important to Psychology. Here is where you MUST detail the specific concepts, theories, accomplishments, awards, etc. they are accredited with. You MUST explain this fully, in great detail, to earn maximum credit. _____ (20 points)
  • Explain, in detail, at least 2 research/experiments and/or novels associated with your historical figure. Do not simply list them, you must provide a complete synopsis of both to earn maximum credit _____ (20 points)
  • Students will describe the school of thought/theoretical perspective associated with their historical figure. Do they come from a Functionalism, Psychoanalytic, Behaviorist, Humanism, etc. background?_____ (15 points).
  • Grammar and Punctuation: 10 pts
  • Sources cited: 10 pts
  • Appropriately formatted: 10pts
Posted in Uncategorized

Discussion Board Post Post

Discussion Board Post Post

Rubric: Lesson 5, Assignment 1

Part 1: (10 pts)

Review the discussion question (provided below) on Rule 404b and post your answer on the discussion board. Then read and comment on posts left by at least two other students (keep it civil). Your comments are meant to be critiques; I will not accept “I agree with what she said.” Give the post some consideration and write a thoughtful answer (a paragraph at least).

• Clearly and concisely answer the question and justify your answer (5pts). • 250 word Maximum.

• Post your answer on the discussion board (you will have to create a new thread—PLEASE use your name as the thread title) by

Wednesday, September 21th, midnight, CST.

 

page2image2828283584

Last week, Arkansas began prosecuting Ivan Byrning for his role in a series of fifteen Arsons that have occurred over the last 12 months. The evidence against Byrning is circumstantial, and not particularly strong, except that witnesses can place Byrning at 12 of the 15 fires. Still, the state has no direct evidence that Ivan set the fires. Ivan has taken the stand and testified that he didn’t set the fires, and that in his job with a lawn mowing service, he is often outdoors and just happened to be in the area where the houses burned—it’s mere coincidence. The prosecutor wants to introduce some evidence. Decide whether can come in under 404b. Justify your answer. There may be more than one part of Rule 404b that applies.

• Evidence that Ivan was arrested two years ago for battery, after he fought with a college student in a local bar. Ivan was convicted.

• Evidence that Ivan was convicted for petty larceny four years ago, when he stole food and clothing from a Walmart Supercenter.

• Evidence that Ivan was the key suspect in three arsons that occurred in 2002, 2008, and 2010.

Posted in Uncategorized